The Linux versus Microsoft war is over

None of my application I have now will run on it, and I can't just download stuff and expect it to work. For Linux to succeed they will need to make a new internet full of linux type binaries and stuff that works on it.

You misunderstand. The battleground is not the desktop or gamers (I doubt that Linux bothers much) but the arena of cheap computing (big bux for MS) and (arguably) the future of computing. Windows will lose bigtime.

The users of cheap computing will require reliability, browsing capability and a software suite with tools similar to MS Office. Linux has it all. Not games. You don’t go for a cheap computer if you want to play high-end games. Totally different markets.
 
Elimentals;5981418Linux only came about in the 90's and is "unix like" so its far younger than Dos/windows.[/QUOTE said:
NOTE:
Linux (or Unix) has also been around for a long, long time (longer than Windows)...

Linux is written around the Unix kernel far, far more than Windows. The time it has been around refers to Unix. If you are familiar with Unix commands, it’s a (very) short step to Linux.
 
Linux is written around the Unix kernel far, far more than Windows. The time it has been around refers to Unix. If you are familiar with Unix commands, it’s a (very) short step to Linux.

Linux, is the kernel, and was original based on Minix not Unix. I gave you that it looks like Unix but its not Unix at all, in fact people will have a field day if any of its code was coped from Unix.
 
Linux is written around the Unix kernel far, far more than Windows. The time it has been around refers to Unix. If you are familiar with Unix commands, it’s a (very) short step to Linux.
You are confusing the posix standard with the kernel. The posix standard API is used by many different OS`s... thats why they share the same commands. Its got nothing to do with the kernel.
 
Linux, is the kernel, and was original based on Minix not Unix. I gave you that it looks like Unix but its not Unix at all, in fact people will have a field day if any of its code was coped from Unix.

SCO would have won their court cases :D
 
... MS is an American company and America has proved to be not above manipulating the IT world to their advantage (the WikiLeaks saga)...
What a wonderful leap! Must be nice to live in such simple world. Why, people who inhabit the same geographic space are just the same! You must be grateful you're the exception.
 
Last edited:
You are confusing the posix standard with the kernel. The posix standard API is used by many different OS`s... thats why they share the same commands. Its got nothing to do with the kernel.

You should take this up with ‘Wired’ magazine. I got the information from a biography of Linus Torvalds (sp) in an interview about Linux.
 
You should take this up with ‘Wired’ magazine. I got the information from a biography of Linus Torvalds (sp) in an interview about Linux.

LOL I stoped at Wired :)

If they report the sky is blue, I would still go out to confirm.
 
You should take this up with ‘Wired’ magazine. I got the information from a biography of Linus Torvalds (sp) in an interview about Linux.

One of the things that came-out in the interview, was that the name ‘Linux’ is a combination of Linus and Unix. Somehow Linpostix didn’t have the same ring.
 
Just a pity IE9 is the SLOWEST on HTML5 > html5test.com
IE9 is the one of the most insecure browsers.
IE9 stole chrome's look.
Don't care who wins.

PS. You obviously don't know what you are talking about, because you haven't seen Ubuntu/Linux running compiz. I'm doing amazing graphical things with my Ubuntu 10.10 Desktop and a 64MB onboard gfx card (Work Computer). Things you only can dream of.
As for the M$ on tablets (LOL) good luck with your whopping 5 free apps.

Was talking about IE mobile jackass. And all the browsers stole browser tabbing from Opera. Who cares? IE 9 maybe slower but a few seconds will not kill me. Nevermind you don't even know how to install a crack.
 
I like The Matrix a lot best movie ever. But I was talking about a standard Ubuntu install not Kubuntu or whatever he was running there jackass. LOL. The standard Ubuntu 11.04 looks sh*t. And that Openoffice looks sh*t too. Give me a ribbon.

I'm not a troll jackass I dont take you seriously with your sarcasm.

Was talking about IE mobile jackass. And all the browsers stole browser tabbing from Opera. Who cares? IE 9 maybe slower but a few seconds will not kill me. Nevermind you don't even know how to install a crack.

Its a jackass troll.
 
I'm willing to permanently switch over to linux when most major game studios release linux versions, and when we get an office suite that is comparable to office 2010/2007.
 
I'm willing to permanently switch over to linux when most major game studios release linux versions, and when we get an office suite that is comparable to office 2010/2007.

I agree regarding the gaming issue, but disagree regarding office - MS Office has been in decline for years, adding new features that are a waste of time (such as ribbon)
adding an 'open standard document format' that isn't exactly open,
and progressively making ridiculous design decisions.
For example, Outlook 2000 used HTML rendering for its email, then they switched to use word to created a html email (complete with Word's broken html issues) which has persisted to Office 2010 today.

Of course these are all things the average user wouldn't know about or even care to know - but those same average users don't care to find out about the advanced features MS Office, and would be just fine using Open Office, but are either forced into paying the MS tax or don't know any better.
 
I'm willing to permanently switch over to linux when most major game studios release linux versions, and when we get an office suite that is comparable to office 2010/2007.

Agreed on Games, disagree on Office, I have yet to find an issue with Libreoffice, and if you really cant live without office you can install it in Linux using wine, same goes for most games. Its just I want to play todays games not the games that was popular a year ago.
 
MS Office vs alternatives

We did an interesting experiment with Open Office at a client of ours. They were upgrading PC's (coupla years ago), but couldn't afford to upgrade from Office 2003, so the guy in charge says 'just give the staff Open Office'
We tell him there could be a learning curve, as people don't like changing from software they're familiar with etc.
He insisted, so we installed OO on all the new PCs. Guess what, the staff didn't even notice. They didn't miss any 'features' and the functionality was similar enough that they mostly thought they'd just been upgraded.
The point is, most Office users operate at this level - they only use the most basic functionality of a Spreadsheet, a Word Processor etc. They could happily use any office suite, and don't need the advanced features of MS Office. (or the extra price)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X