Interesting read.
Nannes: The Experience Gap
Dirk Nannes says that decisions made by Cricket Australia four years ago are coming back to haunt them.*
Many are writing of the terminal*decline of Australian cricket, evidenced by*‘Australia’s worst team ever’ now touring*the UK.
The current team is not as bad as the*press make out, but I do think Cricket*Australia have a case to answer when it*comes to the depth in Australian cricket.
It’s no secret that Australia has a lack of*depth in its batting. Where there was once a*waiting list of hardened batsmen ready to*step into the Test team, there are now none.*A player with a few first-class hundreds to*their name is now seriously considered for*selection on a touring party or an Australia*A game, where in the past regular hundreds*would be required to simply hold your place*in a first-class side.
I certainly don’t blame the current*players. They are getting picked as the*shining lights in a system that is down on*what it once was. But why is it down? And*what has changed?
For me, the start of the decline began in*2009, when Cricket Australia changed the*structure of their first-class breeding*program – the state’s 2nd XI system. Greg*Chappell was in charge at the Centre of*Excellence (Australia’s version of*Loughborough), and he headed a push for*youth in all Australian programs.
As a result, the lauded state 2nd XI*competition was overhauled to promote*youth over experience. Old players had to*make way, as the 2nd XI rules now required a*team to have only three players over 23 years*old. Greg’s belief was: ‘If you hadn’t made it*by the age of 27, you were never going to*make it… so why have them in the system?’
I guess he is right in one respect, as*historically all the great batsmen in world*cricket started when they were in their*teens. But there are so many more things to*consider when developing a complete player.*A great young player is historically born*from a dressing room with a wealth of*knowledge. They have served an*apprenticeship in a strong team, as the*baby in a team of experienced players.*Older teammates shot him down when he *was out of line, tore shreds off him when*he played a rash shot, and handed out*limited praise when he did well. He was*the smallest fish in a vast bowl of*experienced heads.
Since 2009, with the forced dearth of*experienced heads in the first-class*dressing rooms, the youngsters are the big*fish in a small, inexperienced bowl. Where 2nd XI cricket was once an arena where*fringe players kept form or proved*themselves, injured players gained fitness,*and youngsters were thrown to the wolves*and asked to prove their worth, it has now*changed to being a forum where players*wear training wheels in a diluted ‘junior*cricket for grown ups’.
But where have these older guys gone?
With the change in focus towards youth,*many domestic first-class boards changed*their core organisational goals from*‘creating a strong first-class team’, to*‘creating Australian players’. As a result of*the shift in focus and changes to the rules,*older players on the fringe of first-class*teams were finding themselves squeezed off*the contract list, or that their yearly*retainer was falling to a level that made a*comfortable family life unattainable. They*no longer had a cricketing forum to prove*that they were better than the up-and-coming*youth, and hence were shuffled on*before their time.
These are the same guys that would sit in*a change room after a game with beer in*hand, talking everything cricket and*nothing else, waiting for their time to find a*regular first-class game. They were now*moving on to their next job, and their years*of experience went with them.
As a result, the current Test players are*being picked before their time. What would*previously be a 30-year-old Michael*Hussey-type selection is now a 23-year-old,*with only 30 or so games of experience.*Inexperienced players give inconsistent*results, as they have not ripened into the*mature and hardened cricketer that their*potential allows.*We are seeing that in the current series.
These Australian cricketers are certainly*very talented, and may well have made the*national team in previous eras, but their*inconsistent results in this and previous*series could well be the result of decisions*made well before their time in the spotlight.
These small decisions made in a board*room may not seem like a massive deal*when they are made by an idealistic few, but*they have huge ramifications that can affect*a whole generation of cricketers.
In essence, Cricket Australia is reaping*what they have sown.