Mephisto_Helix
Resident Postwhore
Never been a fan of and never will be a fan of AMD is my only excuse, heh. I have an nvme in that list, just the one ssd which is on special for a bargain ... only reason I added it
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Never been a fan of and never will be a fan of AMD is my only excuse, heh. I have an nvme in that list, just the one ssd which is on special for a bargain ... only reason I added it
Probably from the bulldozer days? Who knows?Not sure your reasoning behind the anti-AMD stance. I would encourage you to take a fresh look though. What’s the cost difference between the nvme and SSD, and a 1TB nvme?
What I was suggesting was simply getting a single 1TB NVME instead of a 512GB NVME and a 512GB SSD. Not sure what the cost difference would be but you'd get the speed benefit of the NVME and have less wiring, power consumption etc.1tb nvme is 110 and I can get the 500gb ssd for 39 on special. I will look at the ryzen again, just means hella reading about it .... which is the one I should be looking at?
What's the budget? And what screen resolution and refresh rate?Pc is for an mmorpg, school and work and I need to bite the bullet really soon. Makes waiting for new releases problematic
Still, will do some hard reading and see if I can hold off and if it's worth holding off. Obviously if there's a huge differences in performance for price I need to know. Thanks man.
Okay then you do want some form of beefy GPU to keep the frames up. Here's what i built from Amazon.co.uk, assuming you don't want to wait.144hz and 1ms 27" is coming same time. Budget is between 1600 - 1800 pounds. Had to shave off 900 but oh well
My situation:Pc is for an mmorpg, school and work and I need to bite the bullet really soon. Makes waiting for new releases problematic
Still, will do some hard reading and see if I can hold off and if it's worth holding off. Obviously if there's a huge differences in performance for price I need to know. Thanks man.
As for the performance to price, the IPC (instructions per clock - read, overall efficiency) of the new 5000 series CPUs is up to 19% better over the previous gen. That's a massive uplift and would seem to be worth the wait, assuming independent tests match AMDs claims.Pc is for an mmorpg, school and work and I need to bite the bullet really soon. Makes waiting for new releases problematic
Still, will do some hard reading and see if I can hold off and if it's worth holding off. Obviously if there's a huge differences in performance for price I need to know. Thanks man.
Never been a fan of and never will be a fan of AMD is my only excuse, heh. I have an nvme in that list, just the one ssd which is on special for a bargain ... only reason I added it
As for the performance to price, the IPC (instructions per clock - read, overall efficiency) of the new 5000 series CPUs is up to 19% better over the previous gen. That's a massive uplift and would seem to be worth the wait, assuming independent tests match AMDs claims.
That's going to be an interesting thing to check out - the 5600X is priced 50% higher than the 3600. Will it be worth the money with 9% higher boost and the better IPC?
I'm thinking the 5000 series CPU's AMD are launching are not the ones a value-conscious buyer would want (besides the 5900X and 5950X, probably) - the better value would come from non-X parts. Whether or not that's worth the wait, that's another question.
AMD is still the cheaper option when you factor in motherboard pricing, but yea, not quite the value option they once were. Then again, if they're better at everything, it's hard to argue against it. Currently only X parts announced, not sure that I'd go for a non-X part anyway, unless they did something special with the pricing.That's going to be an interesting thing to check out - the 5600X is priced 50% higher than the 3600. Will it be worth the money with 9% higher boost and the better IPC?
I'm thinking the 5000 series CPU's AMD are launching are not the ones a value-conscious buyer would want (besides the 5900X and 5950X, probably) - the better value would come from non-X parts. Whether or not that's worth the wait, that's another question.
Can anyone here who's running 2 FULL-length GPU's in a chassis please let me know which chassis you have?
I'm looking for Chassis for 2 full-length cards (1080ti's ) but i'm struggling to find ones, even ATX, that seem to fit it just by browsing on the Net. So I'm hoping someone her with experience in them will know what works well.
AMD is still the cheaper option when you factor in motherboard pricing, but yea, not quite the value option they once were. Then again, if they're better at everything, it's hard to argue against it. Currently only X parts announced, not sure that I'd go for a non-X part anyway, unless they did something special with the pricing.

Yea a 3600 is perfect for gaming right now. However, this is a work and gaming rig, so a couple extra cores and higher clocks could be useful. Also, we expect games to take better advantage of more cores so the extra would provide longevity.They're competing with themselves mostly...I'm thinking for people buying new, Zen 2 is going to be quite compelling for gaming at 1440p and above. So the motherboard pricing isn't really an issue.
Steve just released a video that kind of speaks to where money is best spent. The 200 dollar 3600 makes the 10900K and 3950X look like a definite waste of money at higher resolutions (gaming only) even paired with a 3080. I'm guessing the 5000 series parts are going to have a similar challenge justifying their pricing.
View attachment 931599