Enby Panda
Expert Member
That's disappointing.No apology. Just some excuse that he's dealing with in private.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
That's disappointing.No apology. Just some excuse that he's dealing with in private.
I have made my choice known, and no one can ever accuse him of being a coward, He overthrew the National Party puppet.Since I've been pointing and laughing at everyone else's choices. Can you and @JuliusSeizure make your own choices known so I can point and laugh some more. TIA

I have made my choice known, and no one can ever accuse him of being a coward, He overthrew the National Party puppet.
View attachment 1540169
Lol - like there are records.
And like you will receive anything in 5 days...Lol - like there are records.
Yeah, what happens in 5 days? Warrant of arrest for ANC?And like you will receive anything in 5 days...
Yeah, what happens in 5 days? Warrant of arrest for ANC?
Judgement reserved.Well we'll find out in 5 days won't we![]()
I have made my choice known, and no one can ever accuse him of being a coward, He overthrew the National Party puppet.
View attachment 1540169
The ANC has a head start of 5 days to remove all evidence
I have made my choice known, and no one can ever accuse him of being a coward, He overthrew the National Party puppet.
View attachment 1540169
Did not even realise he's the Oblivion NPC.
Good choice.
DA gets things done. They LIFT people up too.
Oh ****. That means a shitton of people abroad can now vote...
They must just deal with home affairs now.
Oh ****. That means a shitton of people abroad can now vote...
DA must alert people pronto. DA usually receives about 80%+ of the overseas vote!
Oh ****. That means a shitton of people abroad can now vote...
Do you know why they were not aware they've lost their citizenship?
Oh ****. That means a shitton of people abroad can now vote...
Do you know why they were not aware they've lost their citizenship?
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) today declared that s 6(1)(a) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 is inconsistent with the Constitution and is invalid from its promulgation on 6 October 1995. It is further declared that those citizens who lost their citizenship by operation of s 6(1)(a) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 are deemed not to have lost their citizenship. Download the judgment here.
After a 9-year-long campaign by the DA Abroad and a 5-year court battle by the DA, the judgment of the SCA is a victory for the constitutional right to citizenship.
Section 6(1) of the Citizenship Act provides that an adult citizen loses their South African citizenship if they take on the citizenship of another country by a voluntary and formal act other than marriage without first receiving permission from the minister of home affairs to retain their South African citizenship.
Who says they were not aware?Do you know why they were not aware they've lost their citizenship?