The issue is CCC did not really have an actual campaigning strategy. Zanu was busy making themelves look good by fixing electricity and doing other shenanigans while CCC was busy preaching the word of God. I am yet to see any concrete evidence that CCC has more support than Zanu outside of the capital city. Zanu has a history of rigging and i am pretty sure they played around with numbers on this election... but then again based on the numbers i saw going to Zanu rallies, it is not outside the realm of possibility that they lost fair and square as well in as much as people might not want to consider that possibility.
Not arguing with what you said, but Zanu did not fix much which is why they are still pouring over the border into SA. Anyway as the govt it was their responsibility to fix things, not that of the opposition. No electricity for more than 20 hours most days.
Possession is 9 tenths of the law. Zanu are banking on that. Results have been announced, and their candidate is returning president, no amount of arguing or complaining will make them budge.
The rigging was not necessarily fudging the figures, but from all the election monitors reports the elections were stolen as follows:
1. CCC was not allowed at all to campaign in the rural areas until the last week of campaigning - combination of police bans, army and Zanu thugs violently breaking up rallies. Opposition banned from national TV and radio.
2. Rural voter intimidation. Forced attendance at Zanu rallies, with threats that the violence of previous elections would be unleashed. So Zanu can say look at the attendance at our rallies, we are so popular.
3. Rural voter intimidation on the day of voting. Zanu setup desks outside each polling station and recorded names and ID numbers of each voter before they went in to vote. Votes are tallied per polling station, and the voters were told that with this information it would be easy to trace whether they voted for the opposition after the election. There are videos of this, and it is mentioned as a big factor in the election monitors reports.
4. Frustration of voters in areas where opposition is strong (urban areas). Some polling stations there were no ballot papers until after 5pm, when voting was supposed to end at 7pm, so most voters just left (not allowed to vote at alternative polling stations).
The opposition "lost" the presidential election by about 400k votes. If elections were free and fair it would not be surprising if the opposition would have won the elections.