South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Very disappointedCiri's Witcher 4:
There is just something about the faces that looks super uncanny.Ciri's Witcher 4:
Isn't it explained in the books? Genuine question because I haven't read them. I know that The Witcher's orginal author described Ciri as a fully-fledged witcher in the books though. She has been trained as a witcher and in this trailer you can see in her eyes she has mutated. She has cat eyes.Very disappointed
Hated the parts of Witcher 3 where you are forced to play as Ciri
They will also need to explain how Ciri can use Witcher signs and not die from Witcher potions
She is at best a Monster Slayer with Elder blood
No trials of the grasses = not a Witcher
Yup, provides a link with the old series, but also offers new places for the series to go.It was always clear the next game would be about ciri. Its always been clear even in the books that she is the most important character.
Games are not the booksIsn't it explained in the books? Genuine question because I haven't read them. I know that The Witcher's orginal author described Ciri as a fully-fledged witcher in the books though. She has been trained as a witcher and in this trailer you can see in her eyes she has mutated. She has cat eyes.
Also, it should have been clear for anyone who has played Witcher 3 that she would be the protag in Witcher 4. Or at least that's how I always saw it that her short playable parts were sort of a taste of things to come in the future.
DisagreeIt was always clear the next game would be about ciri. Its always been clear even in the books that she is the most important character.
Will need to be explained in the storyAlso remember that Ciri is of the School of the Lynx (as hinted in the first teaser trailer). The Lynx is brand new so one knows anything about the school or what they're about etc.
Could be that she started it because she isn't a traditional witcher or something like that.
NoneSo, what's the issue with playing as Ciri, exactly?
I don't mind it really. It would have been nice to go a more open route, with character creation etc.None
Just disappointed it's the obvious route they are taking
I like Ciri as a characterI don't mind it really. It would have been nice to go a more open route, with character creation etc.
But Ciri is generally a well-liked character I think and it makes things easier in terms of narrative, voice acting etc. Keeps the cost of the game down without any real limitations.
Also expands on an existing character which I like.
Yea fair enough, I get that.I like Ciri as a character
The entire Witcher series as good female characters
I just prefer Role-playing as a man
Now you, see, that's where it get's trickyYea fair enough, I get that.
The real question is can we still romance Yennefer or Triss?