US Election 2020 - Pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:

So, I access the report, and lo and behold:

(U) Volume 5 of the report on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference is the last body of work relating to the Committee's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. This final volume brings an end to more than three years of investigative work. Bipartisan professional staff reviewed more than one million documents and interviewed more than 200 witnesses to produce over 1,000 pages of analysis. Volume 5 exhaustively reviews the counterintelligence threats and vulnerabilities to the 2016 election, but never explicitly states the critical fact: the Committee found no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government in its efforts to meddle in the election.
Click to expand...

(U) Volume 5 is an important contribution to the historical record from which historians will someday draw. As is evident to those who read all five volumes of the Committee's report, the Russian government inappropriately meddled in our 2016 general election in many ways but then-Candidate Trump was not complicit. After more than three years of investigation by this Committee, we can now say with no doubt, there was no collusion.
Click to expand...

It's like these people don't even read the material they allude to.

But, right after that, there is this nugget;

(U) It is our conclusion, based on the facts detailed in the Committee's Report, that the Russian intelligence services' assault on the integrity of the 2016 U.S. electoral process and Trump and his associates' participation in and enabling of this Russian activity, represents one of the single most grave counterintelligence threats to American national security in the modem era.
Click to expand...

But it's totally bipartisan, guys!
 
Emjay said:
So, are we back to the Russian collusion conspiracy theory?

Whilst I am at it. I would like to remind everyone that more FBI members have been indicted than Trump family members in this regard. But, let's keep talking about this, amiright?
Click to expand...
Did the Bi-Partisan Senate committee just make this up?


Is it a theory, when it gets confirmed as below?
1188b79610c903efa67122154b948508.jpg
 
Emjay said:

So, I access the report, and lo and behold:





It's like these people don't even read the material they allude to.

But, right after that, there is this nugget;



But it's totally bipartisan, guys!
Click to expand...
To this day you still can't comprehend the difference between the legal definition of "collusion" and "participating and enabling".

This is the last I will say on the topic cause it is clear that you will choose to never understand.

Also if you don't like the report conclusions then tell that to the Republican Senators that wrote it. Tell them they have TDS or whatever.
 
abzo said:
Woah, easy there. You do realize that her background is in law and probably graduated in the top 1% of her class, right?
Click to expand...

She has a deep respect for the checks and balances of the US judicial system.
 
AlmightyBender said:
Also if you don't like the report conclusions then tell that to the Republican Senators that wrote it. Tell them they have TDS or whatever.
Click to expand...

Thats the funny part, hyper partisanjay going to the next level of hyper partisanship.
 
AlmightyBender said:
To this day you still can't comprehend the difference between the legal definition of "collusion" and "participating and enabling".

This is the last I will say on the topic cause it is clear that you will choose to never understand.

Also if you don't like the report conclusions then tell that to the Republican Senators that wrote it. Tell them they have TDS or whatever.
Click to expand...

So listen to the Senators instead of reading the documents yourself?

maths.jpg
 
Since this is a tech forum, thought this might be interesting. Didn't know as many as 42 million Americans are without access to broadband. That's really shocking for a superpower! Also didn't know that Trump is not a supporter of net neutrality...telecommunications businesses should not be in the business of dictating what content can frow freely and what cannot.

broadbandnow.com

Where Donald Trump and Joe Biden Stand On Key Broadband Issues - BroadbandNow

As the 2020 election draws closer, here is a detailed look at where every presidential candidate stands on popular broadband issues.
broadbandnow.com broadbandnow.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X