US Election 2020 - Pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Greg:
Trump is a fat liar. All he does is lie. $W%$^

CNN lies.

Greg:
Cry more.

We have always known that your moral outrage has been fake.

Would you say it's as fake as your holier-than-thou morality? More? Less?
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,013
Would you say it's as fake as your holier-than-thou morality? More? Less?

Every time you complain about a lie, it is going to ring hollow, because this is not even the first time you let your mask slip recently.

1600327501347.png

See, you are so upset about Trump being an immoral, lying pig, yet, you back a party which is propping up a man who is not going to make it through his potential first term. Thus lying to millions of people. And they are all aware Warren will end up POTUS, hence the Freudian slips by both Biden and Warren.

You are comfortable with the DNC playing politics with this position and deceiving an entire nation, but clutch your pearls at even the most innocuous **** done by Trump.

Fake. All of it.

You now tell me who is holier than thou, Greg.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Every time you complain about a lie, it is going to ring hollow, because this is not even the first time you let your mask slip recently.

View attachment 914681

See, you are so upset about Trump being an immoral, lying pig, yet, you back a party which is propping up a man who is not going to make it through his potential first term. Thus lying to millions of people. And they are all aware Warren will end up POTUS, hence the Freudian slips by both Biden and Warren.

You are comfortable with the DNC playing politics with this position and deceiving an entire nation, but clutch your pearls at even the most innocuous **** done by Trump.

Fake. All of it.

You now tell me who is holier than though, Greg.

I mean you're literally posting a screenshot where I say I'm okay with Joe being a one-term transitional POTUS.

And, please, don't bring playing politics into a thread where your tribe literally nixed primaries challenging your orange god.

Did you think we didn't notice or have goldfish memories?
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,013
I mean you're literally posting a screenshot where I say I'm okay with Joe being a one-term transitional POTUS.

And, please, don't bring playing politics into a thread where your tribe literally nixed primaries challenging your orange god.

Did you think we didn't notice or have goldfish memories?

It's sad when a man of your age cannot even be honest with himself. You would have thought life experience would actually bring about some self awareness.

Alas, this is not the case.

Edit:

Since you won't get it, I am going to spell it out. The DNC did the same to Sanders in 2016. Once again, fake moral outrage. I don't agree with it, but I can at least acknowledge that both sides do the shitty things. You won't, because like what we witnessed with AlmightyBender and a surprising number of other people, he despises the other, and thinks that his ideological beliefs make him better than them. So you would never admit it, because it's the same with you.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
It's sad when a man of your age cannot even be honest with himself. You would have thought life experience would actually bring about some self awareness.

Alas, this is not the case.

Projection is a cruel mistress, Em.
 

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,979
^So you're attacking a person who's book you didn't even read. Classic Buka.



Accuses me of gaslighting then immediately gaslights me as a propaganda agent. As I said terminal TDS folks.
I read Maps of Meaning. Felt like I was drinking glass reading it. I also read 12 Rules. Have you read it?

You are regurgitating propaganda.

Tucker confirmed in court that he expects his viewers not to take what he says as factual. The very definition of propaganda.

Now Tucker comes out, in the midst of several revelations, in Donald's own words that he lied to the country about the virus and also lied to the country about how China was dealing with it, with a "bombshell" of a story with a "whistleblower" that the virus was man made.

For Trump's base that subsist purely on Trump's tweets and Fox News, this is 3 Michelin star food. The fact that the President lied does not even feature anymore. They found a scapegoat and a nee shiny thing to distract them away from the truth of their president, his lies and his failures.

Amazing how some countries were able to protect their people from this man made virus. Almost as if even if it was man made, countries have at their disposal the means and opportunity to protect themselves.

Which ever way you look at it, it is still bad for Trump. If it was man made, he still lied about its danger and still failed to protect people.

The whole story is stupid. The virus, its RNA has been studied the world over. If it was man made, organisations like AstraZeneca would be shouting to the rooftops by now.

But, it sounds so juicy to a base that falls for BS like Qanon, because it is easier for their cognitive dissonance to believe that it was a sinister plot, rather than the failings of an incompetent liar of a president.

Trump lied. Tucker knows Trump lied, but not in a million years will he put any light on that and instead he will shade it and distract away from it.

This is where you come in. Gaslighting any attempt to call out Tucker for who is, which by his own admission, he is a propagandist.

You were all too happy to miss the point of my message, which was to highlight the visceral hypocrisy of Tucker.

In so doing you become the useful little propagandist to throw mud at the idea that Trump lied, Trump was incompetent and Trump failed in his duties to protect Americans.
 

Unhappy438

Honorary Master
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
24,915
Nice to see you posting a well researched, unbiased article from a reputable source for a change. Not.

88aa5a9708fe10faa3529b8420fc07aa.jpg
 

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,892
I read Maps of Meaning. Felt like I was drinking glass reading it. I also read 12 Rules. Have you read it?

You are regurgitating propaganda.

So then debunk it. It should be easy to refute the WELL STOCKED BIBLIOGRAPHY!

Tucker confirmed in court that he expects his viewers not to take what he says as factual. The very definition of propaganda.

This has been debunked by other posters. Several times. Yet, here you are.


Now Tucker comes out, in the midst of several revelations, in Donald's own words that he lied to the country about the virus and also lied to the country about how China was dealing with it, with a "bombshell" of a story with a "whistleblower" that the virus was man made.

For Trump's base that subsist purely on Trump's tweets and Fox News, this is 3 Michelin star food. The fact that the President lied does not even feature anymore. They found a scapegoat and a nee shiny thing to distract them away from the truth of their president, his lies and his failures.

Lol, TDS here folks. WTF has the point of his story got to do with Trump?

Amazing how some countries were able to protect their people from this man made virus. Almost as if even if it was man made, countries have at their disposal the means and opportunity to protect themselves.


The topic was about the origins of the virus not the response to it. Focus Doogle!


Which ever way you look at it, it is still bad for Trump. If it was man made, he still lied about its danger and still failed to protect people.

TDS and whataboutism again.


The whole story is stupid. The virus, its RNA has been studied the world over. If it was man made, organisations like AstraZeneca would be shouting to the rooftops by now.

The entirety of Buka's rebuttal, an appeal to authority. Logical fallacy.

But, it sounds so juicy to a base that falls for BS like Qanon, because it is easier for their cognitive dissonance to believe that it was a sinister plot, rather than the failings of an incompetent liar of a president.


Trump lied. Tucker knows Trump lied, but not in a million years will he put any light on that and instead he will shade it and distract away from it.

This is where you come in. Gaslighting any attempt to call out Tucker for who is, which by his own admission, he is a propagandist.

Whataboutism and as shown before, this point has been dismissed.

You were all too happy to miss the point of my message, which was to highlight the visceral hypocrisy of Tucker.

In so doing you become the useful little propagandist to throw mud at the idea that Trump lied, Trump was incompetent and Trump failed in his duties to protect Americans.

Now gaslighting in aisle one. As repeated ad nauseam, this has been debunked and the exact same is done by the journalists you hold in such high esteem. Hypocrisy be thy name Buka!

:X3:

/edit
The only person gaslighting here is you intimating that people who watch Tucker are morons who do no thinking of their own.
 
Last edited:

Pegasus

Honorary Master
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
13,973
So then debunk it. It should be easy to refute the WELL STOCKED BIBLIOGRAPHY!



This has been debunked by other posters. Several times. Yet, here you are.




Lol, TDS here folks. WTF has the point of his story got to do with Trump?




The topic was about the origins of the virus not the response to it. Focus Doogle!




TDS and whataboutism again.




The entirety of Buka's rebuttal, an appeal to authority. Logical fallacy.



Whataboutism and as shown before, this point has been dismissed.



Now gaslighting in aisle one. As repeated ad nauseam, this has been debunked and the exact same is done by the journalists you hold in such high esteem. Hypocrisy be thy name Buka!

:X3:

Apparently everything burka or any leftist says is factual.
It is the way.
 

Pegasus

Honorary Master
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
13,973
I read Maps of Meaning. Felt like I was drinking glass reading it. I also read 12 Rules. Have you read it?

You are regurgitating propaganda.

Tucker confirmed in court that he expects his viewers not to take what he says as factual. The very definition of propaganda.

Now Tucker comes out, in the midst of several revelations, in Donald's own words that he lied to the country about the virus and also lied to the country about how China was dealing with it, with a "bombshell" of a story with a "whistleblower" that the virus was man made.

For Trump's base that subsist purely on Trump's tweets and Fox News, this is 3 Michelin star food. The fact that the President lied does not even feature anymore. They found a scapegoat and a nee shiny thing to distract them away from the truth of their president, his lies and his failures.

Amazing how some countries were able to protect their people from this man made virus. Almost as if even if it was man made, countries have at their disposal the means and opportunity to protect themselves.

Which ever way you look at it, it is still bad for Trump. If it was man made, he still lied about its danger and still failed to protect people.

The whole story is stupid. The virus, its RNA has been studied the world over. If it was man made, organisations like AstraZeneca would be shouting to the rooftops by now.

But, it sounds so juicy to a base that falls for BS like Qanon, because it is easier for their cognitive dissonance to believe that it was a sinister plot, rather than the failings of an incompetent liar of a president.

Trump lied. Tucker knows Trump lied, but not in a million years will he put any light on that and instead he will shade it and distract away from it.

This is where you come in. Gaslighting any attempt to call out Tucker for who is, which by his own admission, he is a propagandist.

You were all too happy to miss the point of my message, which was to highlight the visceral hypocrisy of Tucker.

In so doing you become the useful little propagandist to throw mud at the idea that Trump lied, Trump was incompetent and Trump failed in his duties to protect Americans.

Which political commentators only make factual statements?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top