How is saying there's no indication of who broke the gate or when, different from saying there's no evidence that the protesters did it? I did not lie. My point was that you cannot bring yourself to accept the obvious conclusion that the protesters broke the gate because you are so intent on casting them in a good light. Unless someone else broke the gate as a conspiracy to make the protesters look bad. Or, maybe aliens did it; I mean, there's no evidence to the contrary, is there?
It is a lie, because you're claiming I said things that I never said.
And I said there's no indication at present because it leaves it open that protesters did break it. But you're still ignoring the footage showing the protesters walking through the open, unlocked gate. So it was likely broken some time after they were through.
And I said, repeatedly now, that whoever did it should be arrested and prosecuted, which you conveniently keep ignoring.
Nothing, and this does not support the proposition that they were peaceful, for it may well be that no further vandalism took place precisely because of how the couple defended their mansion. The broken gate, on the other hand, does support the proposition that they were not peaceful.
So collective guilt is your conclusion?
And how come no other properties on the route were ransacked and destroyed? You're undermining your own argument constantly.
This is not true. However, I do not condone lawlessness either.
But you've been pretty earnestly supporting the couple's lawlessness...?
Sign up with Google
www.mediamatters.org
