Regarding them apologising re. their Iraq war coverage. How do you think publications should respond? Double down, lie and refuse to apologise? Like Alex Jones does?
They apologised less than a year after the war started and have been exposing some of the biggest scandals in the war.
As for why they have credibility, you can start here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_won_by_The_New_York_Times
They broke the NSA domestic spying story, they broke stories about the Pentagon using retired generals as TV/radio hosts pushing propaganda for the Iraq war, they broke stories about lobbyists effectively controlling members of Congress and Attorneys General, they broke stories about foreclosure/mortgage abuse, about the CIA's torture programme, about the drone programme and JSOC's 'kill list', about US entanglement in Pakistan with the Pakistani Taliban, their climate change coverage is unmatched, stories about oil spills and cover-ups, water toxification by corportations, political corruption, the Weinstein scandal, etc. etc.
This is a joke... right? :erm: