Perhaps she should just tell them Mexico will pay for it, im sure you will be satisfied with that.
Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Perhaps she should just tell them Mexico will pay for it, im sure you will be satisfied with that.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities?![]()
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities?![]()
Keep posting those quotes, they are brilliant reminders that the American people would rather have such a buffoon than a Democrat.
“It’s totally inappropriate for someone to demand we use law enforcement resources to investigate a 35-year-old allegation when she won't go under oath and can't remember key details including when or where it happened,”
From: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-despite-trump-s-document-order?srnd=premiumThe Justice Department and FBI are expected to submit their documents and proposed redactions to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which will assemble all the material into a package and hand it over to the White House, according to the people.
Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...investigation-into-kavanaugh-allegations.html
Yeah it's Fox, so as credible as CNN:
and then there's this, essentially treason:
From: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-despite-trump-s-document-order?srnd=premium
Despite being ordered by the only authority with the full power to summarily declassify things to release it un-redacted
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.
She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
No, that was the Democrats and Hillary Clinton.
I am not asking you how she would fund her campaign promises. The American people should expect their politicians to be able to answer those questions even on a general basis. And I am attacking her on a personal level, because she should not be a politician. She has no idea what she is talking about.
Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities?![]()
Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...investigation-into-kavanaugh-allegations.html
Yeah it's Fox, so as credible as CNN:
Woah there tiger... Hold up so we can review.
First, the FBI *can* investigate. Just needs 45’s say-so.
Can it investigate a claim like this? Why yes, yes it can, if the WH says so.
Will she testify under oath? Well, has she said no, or has she asked for an investigation before testifying under oath?
Is she the only one who thinks that’s actually a good idea? No she isn’t.
In your opinion she’s fake, she’s political, she’s a girl.. all the things you don’t like. Why would she want the FBI to investigate her claim if there are real penalties and consequences for her if she lies to them?
Her claim includes a witness. One of Kav’s friends... a bold tactic for someone making up fairytales, but why won’t Mark Judge testify under oath? If he says it never happened and it didn’t, how could he possibly be at risk to perjure himself?
Finally, no. No, Fox is not as credible as CNN. Bigger, sure. As credible? I loled.
and then there's this, essentially treason:
From: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-despite-trump-s-document-order?srnd=premium
Despite being ordered by the only authority with the full power to summarily declassify things to release it un-redacted