US politics general thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps she should just tell them Mexico will pay for it, im sure you will be satisfied with that.

Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities? :unsure:
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

"The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive." - Donald J Trump
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

re Puerto Rico
"This is an island surrounded by water, big water, ocean water." - Donald J Trump
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

"I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." - Donald J Trump
 
Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities? :unsure:

I asked some legitimate questions about the current Republican administration's monetary policy and you're just ignoring them. So carry on as you were.
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

"The worst thing a man can do is go bald. Never let yourself go bald" - Donald J Trump
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

re The Ukraine
"Vladimir is not going into Ukraine, OK, just so you understand. He’s not gonna go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down. You can put it down." - Donald J Trump

PS. Guess what Vladimir had done two years *earlier*? Go on. Guess?
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

"I'll tell you, it's Big Business. If there is one word to describe Atlantic City, it's Big Business. Or two words; Big Business." - Donald J Trump
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

"Women: You have to treat them like s**t." - Donald J Trump
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

re September 11th
"I wrote this out, and it's very close to my heart. Because I was down there and I watched our police and our firemen down at 7/11, down at the World Trade Center right after it came down" - Donald J Trump
 
Last edited:
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

re The NYT
"They don’t write good. They have people over there, like Maggie Haberman and others, they don’t, they don’t write good. They don’t know how to write good." - Donald J Trump
 
Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities? :unsure:

Yeah that would be good, glad you also think Trump shouldn't be a politician, you and i agree on a lot :)
 
Keep posting those quotes, they are brilliant reminders that the American people would rather have such a buffoon than a Democrat :laugh:.
 
Keep posting those quotes, they are brilliant reminders that the American people would rather have such a buffoon than a Democrat :laugh:.

American people would rather have? Really?

Clinton - 65,844,610 (48,2% of all votes cast)
Trump - 62,979,636 (46,1% of all votes cast)

Nearly two years down the road and you boys *still* can't get your heads around that.

Electoral college Techne, electoral college... It's the US politics thread brother, try keep up.
 
and then there's this, essentially treason:
The Justice Department and FBI are expected to submit their documents and proposed redactions to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which will assemble all the material into a package and hand it over to the White House, according to the people.
From: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-despite-trump-s-document-order?srnd=premium

Despite being ordered by the only authority with the full power to summarily declassify things to release it un-redacted
 

Woah there tiger... Hold up so we can review.

First, the FBI *can* investigate. Just needs 45’s say-so.
Can it investigate a claim like this? Why yes, yes it can, if the WH says so.

Will she testify under oath? Well, has she said no, or has she asked for an investigation before testifying under oath?

Is she the only one who thinks that’s actually a good idea? No she isn’t.

In your opinion she’s fake, she’s political, she’s a girl.. all the things you don’t like. Why would she want the FBI to investigate her claim if there are real penalties and consequences for her if she lies to them?

Her claim includes a witness. One of Kav’s friends... a bold tactic for someone making up fairytales, but why won’t Mark Judge testify under oath? If he says it never happened and it didn’t, how could he possibly be at risk to perjure himself?

Finally, no. No, Fox is not as credible as CNN. Bigger, sure. As credible? I loled.
 
The interviewer asked, what is the plan to fund her election promises, and she evaded the answer. It is an open ended question, which should could have literally taken in any direction. Her current plans are to tax the corporate base more and tax the rich more, but that only makes up for USD2 Trillion of the required USD40 Trillion.

She is a fool, and the Democrats are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

No, that was the Democrats and Hillary Clinton.

I am not asking you how she would fund her campaign promises. The American people should expect their politicians to be able to answer those questions even on a general basis. And I am attacking her on a personal level, because she should not be a politician. She has no idea what she is talking about.

Aren't you the guy who pretended that you're not actually on the right? lol.

It's like this article was written for you.

The party that elevated clueless buffoons like Donald "climate change is a chinese hoax" Trump (who also doesn't understand trade agreements, tariffs, NATO, the EU, healthcare, etc. etc.), Jim "this snowball I'm holding disproves climate change" Inhofe, Roy "sharia law has taken over the US" Moore, Joe Arpaio, Louie Gohmert, Ben "they built pyramids to store grain" Carson, Todd "legitimate rape" Akin, Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Rick "Juarez is the most dangerous city in America" Perry, etc., etc. don't really get to complain about intellectual capabilities.

Or how about promising more financially sound policies? Is that completely out of the realm of possibilities? :unsure:

She did. :)

The medicare-for-all proposal saves them $2t over the same period as their current spending.
 

Where did she ever say that?

Woah there tiger... Hold up so we can review.

First, the FBI *can* investigate. Just needs 45’s say-so.
Can it investigate a claim like this? Why yes, yes it can, if the WH says so.

Will she testify under oath? Well, has she said no, or has she asked for an investigation before testifying under oath?

Is she the only one who thinks that’s actually a good idea? No she isn’t.

In your opinion she’s fake, she’s political, she’s a girl.. all the things you don’t like. Why would she want the FBI to investigate her claim if there are real penalties and consequences for her if she lies to them?

Her claim includes a witness. One of Kav’s friends... a bold tactic for someone making up fairytales, but why won’t Mark Judge testify under oath? If he says it never happened and it didn’t, how could he possibly be at risk to perjure himself?

Finally, no. No, Fox is not as credible as CNN. Bigger, sure. As credible? I loled.

Additionally, the Repubs are the ones trying to rush the process through (for obvious reasons), no one else. And they apparently don't think anyone else should be there for this, despite ferrying in a cheerleading team earlier (for totally no related reason, I'm sure).

and then there's this, essentially treason:

From: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...s-despite-trump-s-document-order?srnd=premium

Despite being ordered by the only authority with the full power to summarily declassify things to release it un-redacted

Treason? :laugh:

Then let him fire Sessions and Rosenstein, instead of whining like a baby.

It's amusing how it's obvious to everyone except Trumpets that this is more obstruction of justice by Trump. It's extremely obvious abuse of power to stymie an ongoing investigation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X