Well, let me give a summary after 30 hours of DL+
I would agree with Detritus that browsing and streaming for me was at my usual speeds of the last few months - the problem was my downloads (the purpose of DL+).
On a 4 meg line I should be able to download 1.5 odd gigs per hour; so 45 gigs for that period, all going well. I scheduled 34 gigs thinking that even with some slower periods it should all be fine. Well, I managed 23.4 gigs according to Grabit, so way short of what I had hoped for, and just over 50% of the potential capacity.
I do think that for a premium ISP, these figures are nothing to be proud off. I do hope WA is not looking at mass uncapped because it would be a disaster to all users based on this trial they had.
WA - I do appreciate the extra time you gave us for DL+, but I really do think things went wrong in a big way and do hope that you will be giving us feedback and also making changes needed so your systems can cope.
I would agree with Detritus that browsing and streaming for me was at my usual speeds of the last few months - the problem was my downloads (the purpose of DL+).
On a 4 meg line I should be able to download 1.5 odd gigs per hour; so 45 gigs for that period, all going well. I scheduled 34 gigs thinking that even with some slower periods it should all be fine. Well, I managed 23.4 gigs according to Grabit, so way short of what I had hoped for, and just over 50% of the potential capacity.
I do think that for a premium ISP, these figures are nothing to be proud off. I do hope WA is not looking at mass uncapped because it would be a disaster to all users based on this trial they had.
WA - I do appreciate the extra time you gave us for DL+, but I really do think things went wrong in a big way and do hope that you will be giving us feedback and also making changes needed so your systems can cope.