satanboy
Psychonaut seven
On the flipside, how many hard drug users do you know who didn't start on weed? I'm not talking prescription stuff.
The same amount that started sucking their mothers tit. That stuff is addictive!
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
On the flipside, how many hard drug users do you know who didn't start on weed? I'm not talking prescription stuff.
Some of them did smoke weed, some didn't, some still do. None of them started on weed thoughWhat drugs are we referring to, and did/do they never smoke weed? Sure alcohol can be as bad. Not going to get arguments from me on that one.
The same amount that started sucking their mothers tit. That stuff is addictive!
Some of them did smoke weed, some didn't, some still do. None of them started on weed though
Your emotions preclude you from a logical debate.
Your sense of humour precludes you from any discussion.
![]()
I don't understand what you mean.Your emotions preclude you from a logical debate.
I'm sure you're just echoing satanboy's logic there.
On the flipside, how many hard drug users do you know who didn't start on weed? I'm not talking prescription stuff.
Maybe it is caused by traffic accidents or proximity to trees.What drugs are we referring to, and did/do they never smoke weed? Sure alcohol can be as bad. Not going to get arguments from me on that one.
Breaking rules has always been in vogue. No reason they'd get a criminal record either.16 y/o kids breaking rules, and a criminal record is 'in vogue' these days?
So they work for themselves instead of some backward ass who won't give them a job because they happen to enjoy a politically incorrect drug.it's NOT in vogue with employers![]()
No doubt you'd pat yourself on the back thinking that they'd definitely comply. Looking back at my teenage years I can only laugh uproariously at your advice (as we laughed at the hard-line parents who thought they had their children under control).If it were my 16 yr old child I would not endorse the use of cannabis. Frankly, I would probably set the rules and any breach will be met with punishment.
Yes, they have been for the last 100,000 years or so. We're definitely doomed and the world must be about to end any minute.No wonder the youth are a lost generation.
I'd worry about them moving into hard forums.You are much more likely to move to hard drugs from these forums than what weed will ever do...
On the flipside, how many hard drug users do you know who didn't start on [-]weed[/-] alcohol and cigarettes? I'm not talking prescription stuff.
All you guys need to get a joint and calm the ÂĄÂŁ$% down ........![]()
So, the other day jnr's mother is rifling through her stuff
I don't understand what you mean.
You specifically asked "how many hard drug users do you know who didn't start on weed?"
I answered that I don't know any who started on weed (or actually all the users I know didn't start on weed).
You reply my logic is faulty
Did you want an exact number?
:wtf:![]()
If there are 'gateway drugs', it is those, both freely available to purchase legally in our society.
The 'ladder' of drugs is the result of our social and legal constructs, there is very little (if any) evidence that shows there is a chemical path from one drug to the next.
I'm not suggesting that at all - I'm answering your question and showing how ridiculous the suggestion that cannabis leads to hardcore drug use is.Naah, I just made an assumption that by suggesting they started on coffee, you were saying the same thing as satanboy - who suggested they all started on boob. Didn't think you were seriously suggesting that coffee led to hardcore drug use.
I'm sure substance abuse and dependence are linked...
don't think I'm wrong there.
From one to the other isn't the point, it's just one link in the abuse chain.
Thank you everyone for your input. Met with mother yesterday. New furniture was bought for child's room and mother was transferring contents from one pedestal to the other. A pill box bearing the name of another child was among stuff in drawer. Pill box was actually stash.
There are a few technicalities that may or may not bear on the situation. One of these is the so-called invasion of privacy. In my house, you have my rules - not privacy - but that's another thing altogether. My personal feelings on weed may also be an issue. Both mother and myself have been known to partake.
We more or less have a strategy in place for The Confrontation which will take place later today but further input will of course be appreciated. I have cautiously avoided sharing my views in this thread because I accept that I may not be correct and would hate to lead conversation where what I require is input - from all points of view.
Again, thanks everyone.
Coincidental perhaps, but certainly more kids are introduced to cannabis first. Smoking cannabis may not drive you to hard drugs directly - at least not as a result of the substance itself, but psychologically the user often has to cross a boundary from to one than the next. Desensitization occurs at each step. I don't think any sane person would argue that that's the case most of the time. The trouble with science is that it seeks to declare things in black and white all too often. The variables are just too many to take every factor into account.noxibox said:It fundamentally doesn't matter whether they ever smoked cannabis. It's simply a correlation. The order that people encounter drugs is merely coincidence.
Sure, but it's an odds game and depends on the rules you're breaking - who's they are.Breaking rules has always been in vogue. No reason they'd get a criminal record either.
So they work for themselves instead of some backward ass who won't give them a job because they happen to enjoy a politically incorrect drug.
No. You can get pissed again and again without being dependent on alcohol... usually just out of stupidity. Many people do this one weekend after the next for little to no reason.Are they not the same thing?![]()