Lightscribe
Banned
What whites must do
2010-04-09 16:31:42
Political commentator Lebohang Pheko, the daughter of former PAC president Motsoko Pheko, had a run-in with Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (AWB) spokesman Andre Visagie on TV this week. We asked her:
Q: The AWB's leader was murdered. Is their anger understandable?
A: It certainly is, in terms of their own attachment to him, in the way any of us view our leaders we hold dear. But their language of revenge, of blood on the streets, is going too far.
Q: If farmers believe they're under attack, why can't they legitimately focus on that?
A: They're within a context - the general malaise in terms of labour relations between farmers and farm workers is not unique to the AWB. Power has been in the hands of a white minority, including on farms, and the role of farm workers has been chattel, cheap labour, and it's not changing. There is a lack of self-recognition of the damage done by poor labour rights, dehumanising treatment of farm workers over centuries. This self-centredness doesn't see any pain other than their own.
Q: What do you think of President Jacob Zuma's leadership during this time?
A: In recent months he has made two recent visits to so-called white squatter camps, when there are black people suffering just as much in black townships nearby. Why is he so much more concerned with white poverty? It's bizarre.
Q: Do the majority of black citizens still believe the ANC is the best party to change their lives?
A: The polls tell us one thing, but the level of unhappiness tells us another - the strikes, service delivery protests, union stand-offs...
Q: Why don't people vote differently?
A: Maybe because of the lack of voter education. Maybe the propaganda machine that has presented the ANC as "the" liberation movement. The manner in which election funding is distributed makes it easy for larger parties to be more visible.
Q: Back to farms: you've said you want the willing buyer/willing seller formula scrapped?
A: It must be. It's a terrible thing. Where was the willing buyer/willing seller when this land was stolen from the indigenous people?
Q: Do you think that the Zimbabwean model is a good model to follow?
A: It's an understandable model, it could have been done better but the principle is right. This is what happens when the small minority is not willing to surrender its benefits, and do not engage nationhood.
Q: You think farmers should be part of the nation, but should be willing to have their farms taken away.
A: They should be willing to give appropriate restitution - not only white farmers, but white capital. There must be justice and reconciliation, not only truth and reconciliation. The minority still have the same lives - the large houses, the two maids... African people are poorer than before 1994, and the white population are better off.
Q: Would you like land rights in the constitution to be scrapped or amended?
A: They must be amended. It's a great betrayal of our time.
Q: Just farms, or residential areas too?
A: Land is land. The principle is that the land which was taken since 1652, it must be given back.
Q: There may not be enough Khoisan descendants to give the Western Cape back to.
A: It's not just the Khoisan, but all African persons must have a far greater stake in all this land.
Q: How would you propose all white-owned properties be distributed?
A: I think we need to avoid a numbers game. You'd have to do scientific studies of every kind, to ensure that once we have access to this land, it is used efficiently.
Q: Are white land owners on borrowed time?
A: They should think of themselves as being extremely fortunate. The Kempton Park settlement was easy on them. Their entitlements were grabbed, often illegally.
http://www.capeargus.co.za/?fSectionId=3571&fArticleId=5423098&ap=1
Ready to hand over your property?
They need it for more bling... http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article393851.ece/Govt-squandered-over-R1bn-on-bling--DA
Zuma calls for end to sanctions
South African President Jacob Zuma on Friday renewed his call for Western sanctions against Mugabe's regime to be lifted during a visit to Uganda.
Speaking at a joint press conference with Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni at the close of a two-day state visit, Zuma argued the sanctions created an imbalance in Zimbabwe's national unity government.
"One part of the government, which is the MDC, is functioning at full strength because they can travel abroad and mobilise while the other side cannot operate effectively because of restrictions, therefore these sanctions are an impediment," Zuma said.
Govt fails to make headway
Both the European Union and the United States maintain a travel ban and asset freeze on Mugabe, his wife and inner circle in protest at disputed 2008 elections and alleged human rights abuses by his government.
"Zanu-PF has raised these issues that the sanctions are not allowing the unity government to operate at its full strength," Zuma argued.
"If sanctions are lifted we can make faster progress," he added.
http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-03-27-zim-finance-minister-says-media-reform-on-cards
Their audacity never ceases to amaze me...
Last edited: