So you totally missed my follow up post then. Never mind, you clearly have selective reading syndrome. Yes windows 7 is awesome, and yes, windows 8 is windows 7 with extra bits. What I can't understand is how you quantify "premium" and "cheap". Ditching aero has free'd up significant resources, dropping the memory footprint significantly. The boot up times are far quicker than windows 7 as well. They've isolated slow processes and run them asynchronously to improve th user experience. In fact a lot of those philosophies are making their way into developer guidance and tools to help developers make better / faster applications as well.
There is a lot of very real progress in windows 8, yet it has a "cheap" feel? Really?
What exactly is so "Premium" about windows 7 that isn't there in Windows 8? Some aero glass? What is "cheap" about windows 8, less gradients? Really i'm interested, did aero make that much of a difference to your daily computing life? Do you not want better performance (read less memory usage)?