Would you keep wearing a mask?

[zll]

Masks don't work, sanitizing causes super bugs. Just let it be and let nature run it's course.

So if a guy breaks into your house and murders your family, would you go "People are violent. They sometimes kill each other. Just let it be and let nature run it's course?"

Edit. Also, sources to back up your first claim please? At least there's some speculation around sanitizers and superbugs at this point but nothing on your masks don't work theory.

 

[Brian_G]

It's okay zolly, you have made up your mind. So have we. Some of us research more though.

Cheers

 

[Archer]

Wearing a mask protects others. But some of you go as far as to call these kinds of people silly names if they choose to continue doing so? Absolutely bonkers the mentality of some people.

 

[Flanders]

Judging by some of the comments here, looks like we'll all be wearing masks for a very long time to come.

 

[rustypup]

would you go "People are violent. They sometimes kill each other. Just let it be and let nature run it's course?"

False equivalence.

Awesome.

No. I would not be wearing a mask now either.

Certain minds are so delightfully susceptible to fear it's almost comically absurd.

 

[semaphore]

still until today, if somebody tells me to put on a mask, I put it on briefly then lower it again,
pointless telling me, I dont care then, like I dont care now.

You're such a rebel.

 

[Brian_G]

Certain minds are so delightfully susceptible to fear it's almost comically absurd.

A terrrible psychotic burden, I really feel for people who are drowning in fear.

 

[Rouxenator]

So if a guy breaks into your house and murders your family, would you go "People are violent. They sometimes kill each other. Just let it be and let nature run it's course?"

Edit. Also, sources to back up your first claim please? At least there's some speculation around sanitizers and superbugs at this point but nothing on your masks don't work theory.

On a scale of 0 to 100, a percentage if you will, where do you ware the efficiency of masks against a so-called virus?

 

[Grant]

Absolutely

This is my daily wear mask, but I'm shopping around for something with a little more plumage.

 

[Grant]

A terrrible psychotic burden, I really feel for people who are drowning in fear.

You should check out the threads with people giving reason why they will not accept a covid vaccine.

It's a psychiatric's playground

 

[netstrider]

Prince Phillip is the first person on earth dying from old-age for over a year.

 

[netstrider]

You should check out the threads with people giving reason why they will not accept a covid vaccine.

It's a psychiatric's playground

How many microns should a mask's holes be in your professional medical opinion so the spike protein may be entangled?

Would said micron estimate be sufficient for healthy airflow into the lungs in your opinion?

Do you reckon the carbon dioxide that may be trapped within my own mask for reinhilation cause any damage at all?

If so, how much do you reckon that may be?

Do you think this has anything to do with the current respiratory symptoms experienced globally?

Can you get COVID through your eyes?

Should we not have eye masks?

Should we not be wearing butt-plugs?

Awaiting your professional opinion. Not a link to something that corroborates your point of view, merely your own as a medical professional.

 

[Shake&Bake]

In public spaces yes, especially crowded shops etc.
But I don't bother much with malls or markets and stuff anyway.

Parks and beach - spatially dependent. If it's not busy and I can go without it sure. But I will still have it with me and keep my distance from other people.

 

[Bismuth]

Absolutely

This is my daily wear mask, but I'm shopping around for something with a little more plumage.
View attachment 1055943

Let me know what you find, then we can start a cabaret

 

[Bismuth]

Prince Phillip is the first person on earth dying from old-age for over a year.

I am still surprised that they didn't say it was covid...

 

[Cius]

On a scale of 0 to 100, a percentage if you will, where do you ware the efficiency of masks against a so-called virus?

I would guess over 80. Some of the earliest super spreaders identified when this all started where singers in churches. One lady in South Korea infected a large part of an audience in the 100's. Ignoring what others tell you if you look at two particular people in this picture it is fairly obvious:

There is guy near the middle of that photo with the jeans and the brown gloves. Look at the air around him because of the mask he wears. Almost zero visible breath. Almost all droplets exiting his lungs are stopped at the mask point. Compare him to the guy a few spots to the right with the red hat who is breathing without a mask. You can barely see the face of the person to his left the cloud of breath is so large. If you wore a mask in a crowd of infected people who do not wear a mask you will probably get the virus. If you where in the same crowd but they all had masks and you did not you would probably be fine. If we all wear masks in public the chance of the virus being in the air or on surfaces drops massively. This picture is a great way of showing visually what happens.

Hoping this visual analogy can assist some to see how it works. It certainly made things crystal clear to me and reconfirmed what a few doctors have told me who know about a million times more than me about this whole situation.

 

[ArmatageShanks]

No, I must show off me pretty face, and so I can indicate disgust to some members of the public.

 

[pinball wizard]

So if a guy breaks into your house and murders your family, would you go "People are violent. They sometimes kill each other. Just let it be and let nature run it's course?"

100%

Shoot the ****er first. Nature's course running.

 

[Brian_G]

You should check out the threads with people giving reason why they will not accept a covid vaccine.

It's a psychiatric's playground

Trying to bring up the rear, Grant?

 

[netstrider]

I would guess over 80. Some of the earliest super spreaders identified when this all started where singers in churches. One lady in South Korea infected a large part of an audience in the 100's. Ignoring what others tell you if you look at two particular people in this picture it is fairly obvious:

There is guy near the middle of that photo with the jeans and the brown gloves. Look at the air around him because of the mask he wears. Almost zero visible breath. Almost all droplets exiting his lungs are stopped at the mask point. Compare him to the guy a few spots to the right with the red hat who is breathing without a mask. You can barely see the face of the person to his left the cloud of breath is so large. If you wore a mask in a crowd of infected people who do not wear a mask you will probably get the virus. If you where in the same crowd but they all had masks and you did not you would probably be fine. If we all wear masks in public the chance of the virus being in the air or on surfaces drops massively. This picture is a great way of showing visually what happens.

Hoping this visual analogy can assist some to see how it works. It certainly made things crystal clear to me and reconfirmed what a few doctors have told me who know about a million times more than me about this whole situation.

There's a guy on the right of the photo without a mask and without a cloud, there's another guy to the right of your brown glove guy with no cloud.

Could it be they were not breathing out at the time?