Xbox 360 to get Blu-ray?

So according to you if all games came out on blu ray they would be much longer? :rolleyes:

YES! Its only idiots that argue against their best knowledge with such ridiculous fanboi comments. The games will be much better and more detailed as there is more data available to be stored on the BD drive for use. There could be more maps, missions and many other possibilities. If the Multiplats is not required by the main vendors MS and SONY to be equal in size, playability etc, then the game can and will be more advanced on the system with the biggest and best storage system.

Regards to the rest of your comments ... well we just got so used to you Africa logic its not even a joke anymore, we just laugh at you! Shame what burden it must be for you, Hmmm. :p
 
YES! Its only idiots that argue against their best knowledge with such ridiculous fanboi comments. The games will be much better and more detailed as there is more data available to be stored on the BD drive for use.

Then why are most multi platform games better on the Xbox???
 
Regards to the rest of your comments ... well we just got so used to you Africa logic

Talking about Africa logic... there's quite a few things on your list I don't understand. Let's just take one for now...

Best Price.

The PS3 is more expensive than the Xbox, how does it have the best price? And remember, we're not talking about value for money or something like that, cause you have that listed seperatly.
 
Then why are most multi platform games better on the Xbox???

Old news bud, ever followed these issues before? They developed games on the Xbox360 as main platform and then quickly ported them to the PS3 at the last moment before with a penalty in loss of quality and performance. They always claimed the PS3 was to hard to master and develop for. The tables are turning fast as many developers are either using two different teams or doing development on the PS3 as main base as opposed to the Xbox. They claim its the better way to do it due to the additional power and ever improving development tools of the PS3. It's not what I say it's what they said.

The real question is why are the standards of the multiplats for PS3 not the same high quality and standard as the AAA exclusives developed for/on the PS3. That will maybe answer your fanboi question.

BTW Google IS your friend.
 
Talking about Africa logic... there's quite a few things on your list I don't understand. Let's just take one for now...

Best Price.

The PS3 is more expensive than the Xbox, how does it have the best price? And remember, we're not talking about value for money or something like that, cause you have that listed seperatly.

Just go and list the hardware specs, seems to me you are also just using Africa logic. Ever bought a car and never looked at the extras or value for money? Apparently not. What makes the one car (same model) more expensive than the other, Think mags, abs, sound, leather, aircon, metallic paint, Airbags, ................................................................................................................................. etc, then we are not even comparing different manufacturers yet!
 
Not really, there has always been some excuse why the PS3 isn't performing like it should. Maybe of of these days hey? ;)

Again you are out of touch, maybe because you do not read any PS3 related news, still stuck in the Xbox arena and sites.

Read up on PS3 sales and why
Read up on new exclusives and those already released
read up on Unhartered2

Then tell me as a REAL? gamer you are not phased. Everyone denying that is an outright liar or just stuck in the Xbox realm.
 
Just go and list the hardware specs, seems to me you are also just using Africa logic. Ever bought a car and never looked at the extras or value for money? Apparently not. What makes the one car (same model) more expensive than the other, Think mags, abs, sound, leather, aircon, metallic paint, Airbags, ................................................................................................................................. etc, then we are not even comparing different manufacturers yet!

Exactly, that's what you call value for money, which you listed as well. Best price is exactly what it says, the best price between the 2. It doesn't mean "it's actually more, but you get extras..."

read up on Unhartered2

Then tell me as a REAL? gamer you are not phased.

I was reading up on Uncharted 2 today, sadly it was all about the game causing PS3's to continuously freeze at random points. Sucks after all that hype.

And I wouldn't call myself a REAL gamer, for me it's more a casual thing. That's why I want to choose what I want (and pay for). I'd buy a PS3 in a second when they drop all those extras that a lot of people don't need or want.
 
YES! Its only idiots that argue against their best knowledge with such ridiculous fanboi comments. The games will be much better and more detailed as there is more data available to be stored on the BD drive for use. There could be more maps, missions and many other possibilities. If the Multiplats is not required by the main vendors MS and SONY to be equal in size, playability etc, then the game can and will be more advanced on the system with the biggest and best storage system.

Regards to the rest of your comments ... well we just got so used to you Africa logic its not even a joke anymore, we just laugh at you! Shame what burden it must be for you, Hmmm. :p
Im just going to assume you are slightly intelligent and point out games arent limited by disc size, most 360 games are 6-7gb, still space for more missions etc so your stupid argument fails before its out the door, so we dont even have to look into the fact that it costs more and takes lots more time to add more levels etc. but it seems PS3 owners dont mind waiting 5 years for a game *cough GT5 cough* while the competition has brough out 2 games in the meantime which are also better games. Now thats african mentality
 
Im just going to assume you are slightly intelligent and point out games arent limited by disc size, most 360 games are 6-7gb, still space for more missions etc so your stupid argument fails before its out the door, so we dont even have to look into the fact that it costs more and takes lots more time to add more levels etc. but it seems PS3 owners dont mind waiting 5 years for a game *cough GT5 cough* while the competition has brough out 2 games in the meantime which are also better games. Now thats african mentality
To assume all games take 5 years to develop just because GT5 is taking longer is pretty petty. If you look at Uncharted to UC2, it only took 2 years which is standard.
Xbox games are 7 gigs in size. Remember that PS2 games could and still can fit on a DVD-5 and PS1 games fit on a 700mb CD. To say games are not growing in size is also ignorant. If your argument was true then we could assume that xbox games should fit on DVD-5 or maybe even a *shudder* CD?
 
Not really, there has always been some excuse why the PS3 isn't performing like it should. Maybe of of these days hey? ;)
I assume that if you were a PC gamer that if a game doesn't run well on a specific GPU that you blame the card and not the software developer for not properly supporting the card?
 
Exactly, that's what you call value for money, which you listed as well. Best price is exactly what it says, the best price between the 2. It doesn't mean "it's actually more, but you get extras..."



I was reading up on Uncharted 2 today, sadly it was all about the game causing PS3's to continuously freeze at random points. Sucks after all that hype.

And I wouldn't call myself a REAL gamer, for me it's more a casual thing. That's why I want to choose what I want (and pay for). I'd buy a PS3 in a second when they drop all those extras that a lot of people don't need or want.

They say in Afrikaans, "Elke brommer op sy eie drol, anders word hul 'n internet trol"
 
Im just going to assume you are slightly intelligent and point out games arent limited by disc size, most 360 games are 6-7gb, still space for more missions etc so your stupid argument fails before its out the door, so we dont even have to look into the fact that it costs more and takes lots more time to add more levels etc. but it seems PS3 owners dont mind waiting 5 years for a game *cough GT5 cough* while the competition has brough out 2 games in the meantime which are also better games. Now thats african mentality

I agree, as I can see and take note you applied all your Afrcan mentality to that compilation of garbage.

tHAT'S WHY THE xBOX GAMES DO NOT SCORE THE SAME mETACRITIC SCORES AS PS3 ARE GETTING, IT"S JUST TOO PISS POOR. (dAMN cAPS)
 
I agree, as I can see and take note you applied all your Afrcan mentality to that compilation of garbage.

tHAT'S WHY THE xBOX GAMES DO NOT SCORE THE SAME mETACRITIC SCORES AS PS3 ARE GETTING, IT"S JUST TOO PISS POOR. (dAMN cAPS)
yeah they always seem to get higher than the PS3 score, its definitely because there isnt enough space on dvd's :rolleyes:
 
To assume all games take 5 years to develop just because GT5 is taking longer is pretty petty. If you look at Uncharted to UC2, it only took 2 years which is standard.
Xbox games are 7 gigs in size. Remember that PS2 games could and still can fit on a DVD-5 and PS1 games fit on a 700mb CD. To say games are not growing in size is also ignorant. If your argument was true then we could assume that xbox games should fit on DVD-5 or maybe even a *shudder* CD?
I'm not assuming all games take 5 years, im saying to add more levels takes longer, which i quite clearly stated. And neither am I saying games arent getting bigger, some uninformed people think games are short(though they still the same length as they always were :confused:) because DVD9 is holding them back, I just pointed out that there is still 2-3 of space left on the average DVD, read before you comment.
 
yeah they always seem to get higher than the PS3 score, its definitely because there isnt enough space on dvd's :rolleyes:

Ah my favorite PS3 Fanboi Fan again! Google some if you can and see for yourself the BD size required for the latest PS3 exclusives. I am not going to entertain your mindless baseless, factless and useless single line posts!.
 
I'm not assuming all games take 5 years, im saying to add more levels takes longer, which i quite clearly stated. And neither am I saying games arent getting bigger, some uninformed people think games are short(though they still the same length as they always were :confused:) because DVD9 is holding them back, I just pointed out that there is still 2-3 of space left on the average DVD, read before you comment.

Why do you think then Microsoft find it necessary to include a BluRay option in future? Sure for no reason at all! I mean you can still get the same video's on DVD not?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X