You are blaming...who?

Wow, the sockpuppet is strong in this one.

I didnt say it proved me right I was trying to explain it in simpler terms.

You notice I put that in "`s? For a specific reason as its not a true act of God, I used it as a synonym for stuff beyond their control.

lol @ the sock puppet. Doesnt know which way to run.

A little bit of name calling, and no actual response, argument or even content. In no way surprising, considering the rest of your posts.

Cute edit too.
 
Last edited:
Come again..... they know when something is going to break?????? They actually plan for something to break ahead of time???????

No they don't know when, but it is a possibility they are well aware of and that they should be prepared for, and it has happened before. Recently even. Service providers are expected to do that.

Planning for when things go wrong is the basis of the entire insurance industry, brosef.
 
You are taking your stupid analogy a little too seriously, and your argument is inane. Car analogies are stupid, and they are worse when they are used without even any attempt to keep it relevant to the matter at hand. Traipsing around the thread, scraping together analogies that only suit your particular narrow point of view isn't very useful, thanks so much. It doesn't do anything to prove you right, it just adds so much more noise.

A repeater failing is hardly an "act of god", and neither is some idiot dragging an anchor. When an earthquake is the cause you can try on the "act of god" excuse again.

Stop being a company apologist, companies in South Africa generally provide exceptionally poor customer service. If you pay MWEB for a service that is not provided, then it is MWEB that you have a bone to pick with; regardless of their reasons, valid as they may be. You're not a Seacom customer, you're an MWEB customer, you get to yell at MWEB when the service you are continuing to pay for is not being provided. If they can't provide the service you are paying for, they should give back your money, even if God himself descended to earth to steal their cables. MWEB is a Seacom customer. They get to yell at Seacom, and if they had any sense they would have some contractual form of recourse so that they in turn don't have to eat all of this when the service THEY are paying for is not provided.

A break in the Seacom or any other cable system is not an unexpected event, and for Seacom it's starting to feel like a habit. Despite this, MWEB was apparantly caught entirely unprepared for any kind of disruption, and their response has been slow, haphazard and at times outright dumb (blocking SSH anyone?). When something like this happens someone is definitely going to lose money, and in all fairness it should be Seacom primarily, but only in South Africa is the consumer expected to eat it, keep paying and smile.

+10000000000000000000000000000000!
 
Come again..... they know when something is going to break?????? They actually plan for something to break ahead of time???????

No, but they should have a contingency plan in place for when there is a break/fault.
 
No, but they should have a contingency plan in place for when there is a break/fault.

What should that plan be exactly? Existing capacity via SAT3 is saturated. Everyone who relies on SEACOM is now using SAT3. There just is not enough existing capacity. EASSy will improve the situation I expect.
 
What should that plan be exactly? Existing capacity via SAT3 is saturated. Everyone who relies on SEACOM is now using SAT3. There just is not enough existing capacity. EASSy will improve the situation I expect.

As I posted elsewhere...
Folks, as we get closer to kick-off time for the SWC semi-final tonight, our international is going to suck even more than it is right now!! Even though some ISPs have quickly sourced some SAT-3/SAFE capacity you can bet your bottom dollar that all services are going to be severely throttled to ensure that the FIFA broadcast remains unaffected. And then they will keep some capacity in reserve so that there is no congestion as well!

We are going to suffer tonight (and tomorrow night) !!!!

And I just saw the MWEB notice confirming this with immediate effect!
 
Originally Posted by w1z4rd
Yes you didnt give the road manufacturer money (or technically you may have in the form of taxes).. yes, you gave Mweb money for your skateboard, but you are still whining at them because the road is broken (through an act of God).


This Car analogy is dumb.

w1z4rd fails.

Blame Mweb.
 
Originally Posted by w1z4rd
Yes you didnt give the road manufacturer money (or technically you may have in the form of taxes).. yes, you gave Mweb money for your skateboard, but you are still whining at them because the road is broken (through an act of God).


This Car analogy is dumb.

w1z4rd fails.

Blame Mweb.

lol. ure trying sooo hard ;) Blame mweb if it gives you a woody.
Three nicks... reminds me of that one dude on bblounge ;)
 
lol. ure trying sooo hard ;) Blame mweb if it gives you a woody.
Three nicks... reminds me of that one dude on bblounge ;)

i blame w1z4rd.

There goes my woody.

Three nicks? Please dont confuse me with someone else..i have been blaming Mweb since second post.
 
i blame w1z4rd.

There goes my woody.

The sooner SEACOM is repaired the better. Then everyone will get back to whatever they use the Internet for and stop making posts like this one :sick:
 
Existing capacity via SAT3 is saturated.

Is that even true?

If I recall, SAT3 has never been sold to capacity.

Then, what about all the stuff that used to go via Satellite? A few years ago, there was a premium paid for accounts that go via fibre (with low latency) and the accounts backed by Satellite bandwidth were cheaper?

And then, we're not necessarily looking for oodles of bandwidth in the fail over case. By all means, shape torrents into the ground. I'd just like to see other basic stuff working. I should still be able to browse. I should still be able to access my email via IMAP. I should still be able to SSH into a server and do some admin. I can do none of that on MWeb now.
 
Is that even true?

If I recall, SAT3 has never been sold to capacity.

Then, what about all the stuff that used to go via Satellite? A few years ago, there was a premium paid for accounts that go via fibre (with low latency) and the accounts backed by Satellite bandwidth were cheaper?

And then, we're not necessarily looking for oodles of bandwidth in the fail over case. By all means, shape torrents into the ground. I'd just like to see other basic stuff working. I should still be able to browse. I should still be able to access my email via IMAP. I should still be able to SSH into a server and do some admin. I can do none of that on MWeb now.

All ISPs and institutions using SEACOM are now routing through the much smaller SAT3 cable. It's saturated right now.

MWeb status page reports: "Please note, with immediate effect the interim capacity that we obtained from SAIX has been significantly reduced due to constraints on their network. Most customers will not have access to international bandwidth at this point."

No idea about satellite.

I presume Business users are given priority on SAT3.
 
i blame w1z4rd.

There goes my woody.

Three nicks? Please dont confuse me with someone else..i have been blaming Mweb since second post.

So you play HON? Cool beans. I like HON.. so does epeer. You guys should play together sometime :)
 
And it seems the people are dodging the train analogy I posted.

"Stupid people, burning down a station because Eskom failed!"
Now that the shoe is on the other foot I'm sure those people are looking at us:
"Stupid people, blaming Mweb because Seacom failed!"
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X