2007/2008 Premiership Footy Thread

killadoob said:
why he is a legend

vidic evra and ferdinand are the reason united have the best defence in the league
Click to expand...

Fewest goals conceded in a season - 15 Chelsea (2004-05)
Most clean sheets in a season - 25 Chelsea (2004-05)

How are you the best again ?

K thanks :)

Bye

J
 
icyrus said:
They may be a business and as you say they probably to consider image rights when they sign a player (see real madrid signing beckham) but I promise you no club worth mentioning considers a players resale value when they buy them - they consider what influence they can have on the pitch.
Click to expand...

Totally disagree - nobody wants someone who is a flop and will screw the books once bought for big bucks.

J
 
united have the best defence in the league THIS SEASON :) evra and vidic where not around back then

im not worried about previous season's as they have no bearing on this current season

also clubs dont buy players on their resale value

how stupid would that club be

you want to buy players who will play football and help you win trophies

you think united will ever sell ronaldo rooney while they are in their prime, i dont think so mate
 
Last edited:
Last 5years of transfers

Chelsea Transfers In £313.7m - Transfers Out £50.8m
Man Utd Transfers In £157.79m - Transfers Out £67.55m

Sucks to be chelski :)
 
Killa I reckon they do this is especially true for the smaller clubs. Andy Cole would be one such case in point.

J

killadoob said:
united have the best defence in the league THIS SEASON :) evra and vidic where not around back then

im not worried about previous season's as they have no bearing on this current season

also clubs dont buy players on their resale value

how stupid would that club be

you want to buy players who will play football and help you win trophies

you think united will ever sell ronaldo rooney while they are in their prime, i dont think so mate
Click to expand...
 
yea because chelsea sucked before abrom pumped his billions into them

you dont think united dominated the 90's cause they bought like arsenal did :)


what happened to that big mouth brad who has said nothing since arsenal slipped to third
 
Last edited:
killadoob said:
yea because chelsea sucked before abrom pumped his billions into them

you dont think united dominated the 90's cause they bought like arsenal did :)


what happened to that big mouth brad who has said nothing since arsenal slipped to third
Click to expand...

he's run out of excuses?Perhaps the blinks feel off?
 
And United sucked when they were Newton-Heath and before they got a cash boost - how well do you know your United history - whats your point?

J

killadoob said:
yea because chelsea sucked before abrom pumped his billions into them

you dont think united dominated the 90's cause they bought like arsenal did :)


what happened to that big mouth brad who has said nothing since arsenal slipped to third
Click to expand...
 
jsheed_sa said:
And United sucked when they were Newton-Heath and before they got a cash boost - how well do you know your United history - whats your point?

J
Click to expand...

How well do you know yours?

There is no comparison between Manchester United and Chelsea.
 
icyrus said:
How well do you know yours?

There is no comparison between Manchester United and Chelsea.
Click to expand...

Yes there is when united were NH FC they were in danger of going financially bankrupt much like chelsea in the 90's when we almost lost stamford bridge etc - its very very similar.

"Just before having to be shut down for good, the club received a sizeable investment from J. H. Davies, the managing director of Manchester Breweries.[11]. Legend goes that Harry Stafford, the club captain, was showing off his prized St. Bernard dog at a club fund-raiser, when Davies approached him to buy the dog. Stafford declined, but was able to persuade Davies to invest in the club and become club chairman.[12] It was decided at one of the early board meetings that the club required a change of name to reflect the fresh start they had been afforded. Manchester Central and Manchester Celtic were among the names suggested, before Louis Rocca, a young immigrant from Italy, said "Gentlemen, why don't we call ourselves Manchester United?"[13] The name stuck, and Manchester United officially came into existence on 26 April 1902. Davies also decided it would be appropriate to change the club's colours, abandoning the green and gold halves of Newton Heath, and picking red and white to be the colours of Manchester United."

-Wikipedia
 
ok dude seriously wtf was even born in 1902 or knows someone who was lol

im pretty sure it was not close to 300 million pounds but lets move onto the league 105 years later roflmao
 
killadoob said:
ok dude seriously wtf was even born in 1902 or knows someone who was lol

im pretty sure it was not close to 300 million pounds but lets move onto the league 105 years later roflmao
Click to expand...

Sigh at people who dont even know their own club history - im a Chelsea fan and I could probably tell you more about how your club was founded than you could me. Sad.

J
 
see the thing is i was born in 1981 and i dont really give a crap what happens 79 years prior to that

i actually only started watching soccer from 1990 when the premier league started

also when that guy saved united, all he did was save them from going bankrupt hardly the same situation as injecting 300 million into a club and turning them around

im glad he did because the league is better off and more exciting
 
jsheed_sa said:
Yes there is when united were NH FC they were in danger of going financially bankrupt much like chelsea in the 90's when we almost lost stamford bridge etc - its very very similar.

"Just before having to be shut down for good, the club received a sizeable investment from J. H. Davies, the managing director of Manchester Breweries.[11]. Legend goes that Harry Stafford, the club captain, was showing off his prized St. Bernard dog at a club fund-raiser, when Davies approached him to buy the dog. Stafford declined, but was able to persuade Davies to invest in the club and become club chairman.[12] It was decided at one of the early board meetings that the club required a change of name to reflect the fresh start they had been afforded. Manchester Central and Manchester Celtic were among the names suggested, before Louis Rocca, a young immigrant from Italy, said "Gentlemen, why don't we call ourselves Manchester United?"[13] The name stuck, and Manchester United officially came into existence on 26 April 1902. Davies also decided it would be appropriate to change the club's colours, abandoning the green and gold halves of Newton Heath, and picking red and white to be the colours of Manchester United."

-Wikipedia
Click to expand...

We did not spend 300 million pounds to buy the league. Twice.
 
Shush please go google Chelsea and financial bankruptcy in the 90's - we almost lost Stamford Bridge due to debt - its exactly the same thing just a diff era.

J

killadoob said:
see the thing is i was born in 1981 and i dont really give a crap what happens 79 years prior to that

i actually only started watching soccer from 1990 when the premier league started

also when that guy saved united, all he did was save them from going bankrupt hardly the same situation as injecting 300 million into a club and turning them around

im glad he did because the league is better off and more exciting
Click to expand...
 
not really when abrom injected all the money chelsea where not losing anything, they where a top 6 for many years team if my memory serve's me correctly

now if he had saved them when they where losing stamford then its the same thing

aggg but at the end of the day im not sure what my point is anymore lol

im glad he did because its a 3 way fight not a 2 way fight

well its become a 2 way fight
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X