South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Instead of all This mumbo jumbo I think people would of been happier with a simple price drop.
I have to say that I think that is a dangerous thing to do: IMO Vodacom's Data Products have so far been very innovative and have bypassed a lot of historic limitations imposed on Vodacom's Voice Products, this divergence has allowed VDPs to be innovative. If Vodacom intends to make its VDPs fit a differently shaped & sized hole representing VVPs then VDPs will be forced to lose their sense of identity and innovation.
IMO it's a very risky road to travel and will cause Vodacom to slip away from the cutting edge of broadband in SA.
but it's not dropped - you made OOB cheaper but increased the Bundle price dramatically.
If Vodacom calls that innovation then call me billy and spank me with a USB cable.
On the prepaid version:
If you take out a 2GB bundle on the first of January, I understand you continue to have access to that data until the 28th of February even if you don't buy any further bundles between 1 Jan and 28 Feb.
However, if you deplete that bundle in Feb I take it you don't then get the good OOB rates?
Think you might be right, but it's a good question. Let me check. Might be that you run at the original rate for the full period.
I'm trying to come up with some kind of prepaid version where the consumer can come out ahead (i.e. by just buying a double size bundle at the beginning of every second month, thus getting the same as the old pricing but with the flexibility of OOB). However, I do personally doubt the OOB rate would still apply.![]()
I've asked. Actually can't see why not.
/ Added
OK, confirmed. You run at the last bundle's rate for the rest of the period.
Strange...why is 7.2 not available for BB-S users?
Not really, typically around 10%.
Let's take an example:
On BB-S you'd buy a 1Gb bundle for R289. If you go OOB, you pay R1.20/MB.
If you go OOB by 150MB you would have paid (289 + 150 x 1.20 =) R469.
If you were on BB-A, it would have cost you R446 on the flat rate.
And obviously the more you go OOB, the more you score over BB-S.
So, if you're going to exceed your bundle by more than this %, BB-A is actually cheaper.
But if you NEVER go OOB, stay on BB-S.
Ok, so to get that clear in my mind:
If under the old regime I was getting a 1GB bundle every month for R289, I could now buy a single 2GB bundle for R599 every second month.
That would give me access to that 2GB bundle, and the OOB rates if I depleted it, over the full two month period (providing I bought it on the 1st).
So in effect I could get 1GB for "R299 per month" with 7.2 and better OOB rates than on the real 1GB pacakge?
Edit: And if so, is there any other benefit to buying a bundle every month? Other than not having to buy it on the first.
Still no clarity on why BB-S cannot get 7.2Mbps?![]()
@v3g, this is where it becomes difficult for Vodacom to add a more transparent 7.2 add-on VAS fee since it will open up a can of worms for Vodacom when comparisons are made between VCBBS+7.2VAS and VCBBA which already includes 7.2 but at a non-specified price.
IMO one of the worst aspects of voice products [from a consumer's POV] is the lack of pricing transparency, i.e. bundling stuff might be cool from a service provider's POV, but there are some consumers that prefer detailed billing info at no extra charge - which is of course another gripe where voice products are concerned and another reason for not bastardising data products with voice products.
I have read through a few of the posts in this thread and there is one thing that I really don't understand.
MTN offered a product with more or less the same but they were flamed for it. Now, Vodacom offers the same and it gets welcomed???
Somethings I'll just never understand!