Rouxenator
Dank meme lord
what he said
Yup, there it is.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
what he said
I wonder if they will ever give 80mbps as an option on VDSL?
VDSL Port Details Upstream Downstream
Line Rate: 3.129 Mbps 45.147 Mbps
Actual Net Data Rate: 3.072 Mbps 45.055 Mbps
Trellis Coding: ON ON
SNR Margin: 19.6 dB 25.8 dB
Actual Delay: 4 ms 8 ms
Transmit Power: -24.2 dBm 14.5 dBm
Receive Power: -39.5 dBm 2.3 dBm
Actual INP: 2.0 symbols 3.0 symbols
Total Attenuation: 0.0 dB 15.1 dB
Attainable Net Data Rate: 9.654 Mbps 125.127 Mbps
133 Mbps !!!
![]()
I'm quite happy on 40bmps - it's just that more is always better. Been on 40mbps since April last year with not issues at all. Only now that I have a fancy new router can I see my line is, in theory, capable of higher speeds.
I stay about 600m from the exchange.
View attachment 400371
I wish they offered higher than 40![]()
After 2 days or so you will be pushed to 45 147k.... Your SNR went up because VDSL handles the line much better and you can not estimate VDSL line stats or speeds while syncing on ADSL2+ because it's misleading.
So is that whole 700M max for VDSL a sham?
The main thing people are getting wrong when looking at line stats are the line stats in relation to the technology.
FOR EXAMPLE.
20Mbps adsl2+ sync Attenuation 10dB SNR 15dB
If one had line stats like that you would assume the stats would look similar in VDSL that is where people are wrong because the max of ADSL2+ is 24Mbps the distance you have to be from the dslam/exchnage is just under 1KM give or take.
Now VDSL max is 100Mbps down and 50Mbps up so one have to consider that 24Mbps is max adsl2+ so the stats would not look the same on VDSL2 which has a max of 100Mbps this a 20Mbps VDSL2 service will have much better line stats at the same distance compared to a adsl2+ service at the same speed.
I think if you want to have a better estimate you have to look at line stats of a 8Mbps or 10Mbps adsl2+ if you want to move to 20Mbps VDSL2
Because not all exchange areas have been converted to VDSL technologies .....So why dont they scrap ADSL and have 2/4/8/10meg VDSL?
The main thing people are getting wrong when looking at line stats are the line stats in relation to the technology.
FOR EXAMPLE.
20Mbps adsl2+ sync Attenuation 10dB SNR 15dB
If one had line stats like that you would assume the stats would look similar in VDSL that is where people are wrong because the max of ADSL2+ is 24Mbps the distance you have to be from the dslam/exchnage is just under 1KM give or take.
Now VDSL max is 100Mbps down and 50Mbps up so one have to consider that 24Mbps is max adsl2+ so the stats would not look the same on VDSL2 which has a max of 100Mbps this a 20Mbps VDSL2 service will have much better line stats at the same distance compared to a adsl2+ service at the same speed.
I think if you want to have a better estimate you have to look at line stats of a 8Mbps or 10Mbps adsl2+ if you want to move to 20Mbps VDSL2
So why dont they scrap ADSL and have 2/4/8/10meg VDSL?
Yes, up to a point (between 1.6km and 2km, 23 to 26dB on ADSL2+) according to:
Wikipedia NL diagram says that VDSL2 is always slightly better (everyone else says near no to no difference past ~1.8km)
EDIT: netherlands one could be VDSL2 long reach 2, it is soon to be released.
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/04/bt-openreach-prep-trial-long-reach-vdsl-broadband.html
After 2 days or so you will be pushed to 45 147k.... Your SNR went up because VDSL handles the line much better and you can not estimate VDSL line stats or speeds while syncing on ADSL2+ because it's misleading.
So is that whole 700M max for VDSL a sham?