AB de villiers

Bighit

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
2,947
Ok, but one page back, you said "AB de Villiers is not a great Test player, and he won;t be at the end of his career. " With regards to his knock that sticks out, do you not remember South Africa's first test victory in Australia after a lot of years?
 

CL-West

Expert Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
2,637
You're being silly too. I included a full 3 year period with that tour. Still average. Next time you must read properly. anyway it shows you're being highly desperate when you're trying to include just a month of cricket against a 24 month argument!

You are the one that needs to read, his argument was for 1000, which you completely ignore and showed other stats to suite your agenda.

Just as you have ignore the post where I pointed it out.

So practise what you preach cupcake;)
 

ZCFOutkast

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
1,950
Anyway I'll say no more. I' m a keen follower of cricket and I think I'm doing an injustice to Amla by maintainging an argument about a player who has been falsely raised above his true abilities. This is my last post on AB's thread. I have absolutely no doubt that my sentiments will still ring true at the end of his career.
 

thestaggy

Honorary Master
Joined
May 11, 2011
Messages
21,147
Let's see what one Brian Lara had to say, and this was before AB's recent demolition jobs;

Out of today's current crop of world stars, Lara picked out three batsmen he thought were the best around, along with his tip for the biggest star of the future.

"I don't like to meddle in it too much, but looking at the new version of the game and trying to place somebody who is on top in all forms of the game - I would think (AB) de Villiers is someone who has held their own, (Kevin) Pietersen has had a few injuries but he's someone I have great respect for as well.

"Virat Kholi is definitely someone for the future and I'm a little bit worried about my scores in the 400 and 500 region with this young player! He scores quickly, loves all versions of the game and he's tremendous for world cricket."

http://www1.skysports.com/cricket/n...achin-tendulkar-alastair-cook-and-west-indies
 

BigAl-sa

Executive Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
6,652
I am thankful to whoever reminded me of the ignore function. Just a pity that the okes continue to quote the reams of garbage posted.

My 2c: AB and Amla have to be the nicest okes in world cricket at the mo, and have excellent averages to go with that.

1/2c: zfc is the biggest racist on the board and should be banned...
 

Mike Hoxbig

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
43,328
I want LancealotSA back. I can't understand how he's banned but this guy isn't...
 

Beavis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
478
I do not think "race" discussions will help any in this regard...

Surely ZFC would like more promising talents of colour be given the equality as other players, and that I get and in a lot of cases agree, but at the end there is only that many games a year and only so little space available..... "racist" is such a strong word... hehe

In current form AB is a "great" in my opinion, regardless of his records 5 years ago, he does not play on history but current form :p, and that is what is exciting cause there are plenty players chasing him atm, kohli, smith, Williams.... time will tell if he can sustain his performance for many more seasons to come... I for one hope he can do it, and for SA best interest we all should as well...

And ofc # is a "great" of the current times as well, which in all fairness does not seam to get the same recognition that AB does, that I suppose is what ZFC is reasoning as well; but should AB be blamed for it or the fans/media? Should we as the fans get "irritated" by it or enjoy the rich form some of our players are in currently supporting them and not speak of their failures as if it already happened?
 

Noob-Noob

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
7,030
And ofc # is a "great" of the current times as well, which in all fairness does not seam to get the same recognition that AB does, that I suppose is what ZFC is reasoning as well; but should AB be blamed for it or the fans/media? Should we as the fans get "irritated" by it or enjoy the rich form some of our players are in currently supporting them and not speak of their failures as if it already happened?
Nobody said AB is better than #, AB is just a more exciting player, but # is equally as good and just as AB he will go down as one of the all time greats. This thread's name is AB De Villiers and and not Hashim Amla. If ZFC want to praise Amla, then he can go and create a thread for him.
But polluting this thread with his constant garbage is getting a little tiresome now.
 
Last edited:

SaiyanZ

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
8,136
Once again stats don't lie.

Get back to me when you;re done searching for him the lists for fastest to:

2000 runs


3000 runs

4000 runs

But he does make an appearance at 5000 runs. And he's still behind players like Hussey&Bell whom you'd argue are lesser than him ;)

I don't know why you try to make this an argument. AB de Villiers is not a great Test player, and he won;t be at the end of his career. To achieve that, SA would have to play plenty Tests, many away so he can right his record, he'd have to be incredibly consistent, and QdK had better be good enough to prevent Ab from keeping and injuring himself further reducing his games.

Face it and let's move on instead of arguing with it. After Smith&Kallis, the next best potential great is Amla. Period! At least he's been ahead of Smith (&ABdV) in Tests, forget ODIs where he pretty much sits alone. Even then Amla would struggle to be called a great though he's ahead of AB in both formats.

Why do I even bother to convince you guys, when Amla - a superior Test batsman(&ODI) than AB - would struggle to be regarded among the greats even from my standpoint, as well as many! From now on I'll only speak of Amla until AB reaches his heights!

Apparently AB being the 22nd fastest in history to 7000 test runs is not good enough. The only SA players who were slightly faster were Smith and Kallis who batted at the top of the order for their entire careers.

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283185.html
 

ZCFOutkast

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
1,950
Apparently AB being the 22nd fastest in history to 7000 test runs is not good enough. The only SA players who were slightly faster were Smith and Kallis who batted at the top of the order for their entire careers.

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283185.html
If you believe Sehwag, Younis Khan, Mohama Yousuf and Michael Clarke are "Test greats" then suit yourself! ;) Personally I hardly ever hear anyone speak of them as true greats of Ponting, Lara etc class.

One thing is certain Williamson, Kohli, Smith, Root, Ballance and other allcomers will bump AB way down that list as the are brutally doing progressively as it is.

Considering how highly AB is rated, I've always wondered where you guys place Graeme Smith because he's not and will not be considered among those alltime greats, yet he's had a Test career superior to AB's at the same stage of their careers, and the impact they've had on the Proteas' fortunates cannot be compared. Smith is miles ahead. More often than not, his mood decided whether we won, lost or draw - more than Kallis even.

Anyway I said I wouldn't be posting further on this thread so I shouldn;t be...
 

Beavis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
478
True that perhaps Smith does not have the same fan base as AB, but he certainly is considered a "great" of the game, and that is not only my opinion, but of many around the world... Ian Botham to be one of them quotes 'South African skipper bows out as one of the greats of Test cricket...' link

Mmm, not sure if I can post this here and if I should create a new thread for G Smith to make a reply? :whistling::p
 

SaiyanZ

Executive Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
8,136
If you believe Sehwag, Younis Khan, Mohama Yousuf and Michael Clarke are "Test greats" then suit yourself! ;) Personally I hardly ever hear anyone speak of them as true greats of Ponting, Lara etc class.

One thing is certain Williamson, Kohli, Smith, Root, Ballance and other allcomers will bump AB way down that list as the are brutally doing progressively as it is.

Considering how highly AB is rated, I've always wondered where you guys place Graeme Smith because he's not and will not be considered among those alltime greats, yet he's had a Test career superior to AB's at the same stage of their careers, and the impact they've had on the Proteas' fortunates cannot be compared. Smith is miles ahead. More often than not, his mood decided whether we won, lost or draw - more than Kallis even.

Anyway I said I wouldn't be posting further on this thread so I shouldn;t be...

In your previous post you used the fastest to 2000, 3000, 4000 test runs to say AB isn't great because he is not on those lists. i.e. the lists are all important.

Now you're saying there are guys on the lists that are not regarded as greats. So in other words the lists are now meaningless.

You can't have both :D
 

Bighit

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
2,947
Welcome back ZCF, now don't forget to join the mybb superbru group. PS: I picked proteas over zim ;)
 
Top