krustyrsa
Senior Member
Will do!
soz I meant Afriguy, but maybe you can help, I will forward you the PM
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Will do!
soz I meant Afriguy, but maybe you can help, I will forward you the PM
No problem, we'll ask you unofficially too.I'm not officially here
Just replied to your PM.
Does anyone know if a port refresh/recreate forces AISSA to regrade your line?
Why i ask is i have one line syncing just shy of 20meg and it has far better line stats than my other lines syncing at 24meg. Weird.It might change the line stats which could results in ASSIA upping the line stats, but it would probably be temporary as the underlying issue would still persist.
Why i ask is i have one line syncing just shy of 20meg and it has far better line stats than my other lines syncing at 24meg. Weird.
All ADSL, no MSAN here, I wish.Probably a line/port issue then, ask an Afripep to check your line and see if anything comes up.
Or is one ADSL and the other VDSL?
Does anyone know if a port refresh/recreate forces AISSA to regrade your line?
No worries
Was it just 169.1.5.128 where you saw an issue?
C:\Users\Ryan>ping -n 30 169.1.5.128
Pinging 169.1.5.128 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=60
Request timed out.
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=60
Request timed out.
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=60
Reply from 169.1.5.128: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=60
Ping statistics for 169.1.5.128:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 28, Lost = 2 (6% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 51ms
C:\Users\Ryan>ping -n 30 169.1.5.82
Pinging 169.1.5.82 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=59
Reply from 169.1.5.82: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=59
Ping statistics for 169.1.5.82:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 120ms, Average = 65ms
C:\Users\Ryan>ping -n 30 bras.afrihost.com
Pinging bras.afrihost.com [155.239.255.250] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Reply from 155.239.255.250: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=63
Ping statistics for 155.239.255.250:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 9ms
Its both 169.1.5.128 and 169.1.5.82 that I'm guessing are congested during the evening. Don't touch any local gaming on my Afrihost account in the evenings...
-snip
Edit: Just to add, this happens every single night without fail and has been for the last 2 months at least. It definitely isn't an isolated issue that only affects certain customers in the Cape, they just aren't aware it's happening. I wouldn't even notice if I didn't game as every other service I use is on point even when these routers are playing up. Downloads fly 24/7 and streaming is pretty good so keep that up
EDIT 2: For e.g, Doesn't effect a speed test result.
View attachment 382709
Well lately i have no issues as well. Probably because ive secretly become your neighbour

Well lately i have no issues as well. Probably because ive secretly become your neighbour![]()
![]()
In that case, welcome to the neighbourhood where surfing is always cool.Well lately i have no issues as well. Probably because ive secretly become your neighbour![]()
![]()
Thanks, I'll put Iceman's account on ice.Haha!!
Change all the passwords, Lara![]()
In that case, welcome to the neighbourhood where surfing is always cool.![]()