Article: Malema calls Zille a cockroach

Looks like Julius and JZ have kissed and made up following the NGC rebuke.
 
I think Zille should sue potty mouth for defamation of character. He spoke publicly and should be smacked publicly.
 
It will give that tw@t to much attention to feed off. If she ignores the moron maybe he'll disappear.
 
Strange that Malema chose the word cockroach .. Zille is white I have never seen a white cockroach. Malema on the other hand .. dark little fella, fairly low to the ground, beady eyes, scuttling here & there & stuffing his face with leftovers and crumbs from other people .. definitely squash-able by foot.
Julias I'm calling you the cockroach.
 
Name calling belongs to bullies in the sandpit at Nursery School.

Looks as if Malema has not quite realised that. This type of thing is best ignored by the person being taunted, rather than stoop to the level of the bully.
 
Her response was "I'm not being dragged into the gutter with Malema" (not an exact quote). Which is perfect, but actually he should be removed from politics/South Africa.
 
Her response was "I'm not being dragged into the gutter with Malema" (not an exact quote). Which is perfect, but actually he should be removed from politics/South Africa.

Yip. The further the better. Preferably off planet so that no other country should suffer the indignity of having such a royal tw@t fouling up there air.
 
Yeah, I pulled apartheid out of my arse.:wtf: Try reading a history book if you don't believe me. And believe me, the threat of burglary, rape and violent murder was just as high for black people in those days as now, or do you really think that the white cops cared about what happened in the townships of apartheid.:rolleyes:

She may openly criticize the ANC, and good for her but i highly doubt she wants apartheid back. I can promise you now that she did not have a better life then she does now.

What's that name of that history book?

And how do you make promises about other peoples' lives?
 
Some people and their pathetic agendas .. have you forgotten that Zille herself was once an anti-apartheid activist?
 
What's that name of that history book?

And how do you make promises about other peoples' lives?

LOL, go to a library and look up Apartheid, or if you are to lazy to do that simply do a search on google. Apartheid was a very real event in SA history. It was a time where a certain group (the majority of SA people) was discriminated against by a small group of people. A large percentage of this majority group was beaten, tortured, raped, killed and socially and economically discriminated against for a very long time. Yeah, I'm sure a person of that group is just longing to experience it all over again.:rolleyes:
 
LOL, go to a library and look up Apartheid, or if you are to lazy to do that simply do a search on google. Apartheid was a very real event in SA history. It was a time where a certain group (the majority of SA people) was discriminated against by a small group of people. A large percentage of this majority group was beaten, tortured, raped, killed and socially and economically discriminated against for a very long time. Yeah, I'm sure a person of that group is just longing to experience it all over again.:rolleyes:

It carries on today - the discrimination against the many by the few. Just so happens that the skin hue is a little less dissimilar.

One of the many marvellous things about some of the legislation from the era of the Nats and their policy of seperate development was the pass law. Short lesson is that it restricted the movement of people in the 'white' areas. So whatshisface's maid may well have had permission to be there and that would have kept her safe from crimes against her person and property. Yes, please charge in with 'what about the crimes against her dignity' argument.

I'm not arguing for her, or her dignity, or her education. I am saying that it is quite possible that before her life may have been simple with a chat with her friends on a Thursday afternoon to look forward to. Maybe, more recently, she or her friends have been brutalised. From her perspective, things may have been better then than they are now.

So, please point me to the history book that has this person's history in it.

And slightly aside - how big a number is 'a large percentage'?
 
I see we have yet another round of "But my maid/gardner/etc said 'Ja baas it was better during Apartheid'..."

And we have Albareth trying to say the pass law could have worked for her safety as well?
 
It carries on today - the discrimination against the many by the few. Just so happens that the skin hue is a little less dissimilar.

One of the many marvellous things about some of the legislation from the era of the Nats and their policy of seperate development was the pass law. Short lesson is that it restricted the movement of people in the 'white' areas. So whatshisface's maid may well have had permission to be there and that would have kept her safe from crimes against her person and property. Yes, please charge in with 'what about the crimes against her dignity' argument.

I'm not arguing for her, or her dignity, or her education. I am saying that it is quite possible that before her life may have been simple with a chat with her friends on a Thursday afternoon to look forward to. Maybe, more recently, she or her friends have been brutalised. From her perspective, things may have been better then than they are now.

So, please point me to the history book that has this person's history in it.

And slightly aside - how big a number is 'a large percentage'?

OK, whatever makes you feel good.

And is your argument really going to boil down to a petty "how big is 'a large percentage'"? I mean, there is nothing inaccurate in what I said, so what's the problem?
 
I see we have yet another round of "But my maid/gardner/etc said 'Ja baas it was better during Apartheid'..."

And we have Albareth trying to say the pass law could have worked for her safety as well?

It could have too.

:)

Just as people are individuals with different circumstances, it is impossible to say that all laws affect eveyone the same. Sure, we are all meant to be equal before the law, but that is not the same as saying that the law affects us all equally.
 
OK, whatever makes you feel good.

And is your argument really going to boil down to a petty "how big is 'a large percentage'"? I mean, there is nothing inaccurate in what I said, so what's the problem?

Nope - that was an aside. I took your argument on already. This is something new and exciting.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X