Article: Mugabe has no plans to retire

VioAdmin said:
You honestly think that the reason why they haven't invaded Zimb to take-out Mugabe is because they have some sort of restriction from other African countries? Is that what you honestly think is stopping NATO or I am not understanding your question?
Click to expand...

No, I'm asking Logistically HOW would they do it?

Considering the US and NATO have no significant military presence in easy striking distance of Zimbabwe....
 
B.O.F.H. said:
No, I'm asking Logistically HOW would they do it?

Considering the US and NATO have no significant military presence in easy striking distance of Zimbabwe....
Click to expand...

If they wanted, that could easily change within a matter of days. They are already working on getting troops to Botswana(remember the whole fiasco with Malema?)

Zimbabwe has absolutely no resistance to NATO, we don't even have to compare about how many tanks or how many F16 they have me and you both know that.

They have troops in the congo, no other African nation is going to simply shut it's borders and not let NATO cross in-order to protect Zimbambwe or their own country. Africa has no resistance to any invasions other than guerrilla tactics(which could work very well like they did in Vietnam)

They can send 1 drone and drop it on Mugabe, we all know this. I doubt Zimbabwe has anything that can take down a US drone that easily. We have already seen how big of a deal it was when Iran claimed to have taken down JUST 1 of those drones, just one.

The question is not HOW they can do it, the reason is WHY they haven't done it. Doesn't it seem odd that the countries they like to "liberate" often has some sort of resource they get to control over?
 
B.O.F.H. said:
No, I'm asking Logistically HOW would they do it?

Considering the US and NATO have no significant military presence in easy striking distance of Zimbabwe....
Click to expand...

Actually the US does have a base in Botswana according to Malema!
 
VioAdmin said:
No. That web site did not go into detail. Go here: http://www.newzimbabwe.com/pages/sanctions36.13187.html

This is news STRAIGHT from Zimbamwe. You cannot pull artcles from CNN who are clearly biased and vague. Read the above link, here is just some of the quotes:


I repeat, you cannot just look things from one side. Same with what is going on with Syria...You cannot just look at what the EU/US news companies are reporting. You have to at least balance it out by going deeper and getting news directly from the country that is involved.
Click to expand...

My goodness! you actually believe that clap trap. :D

VioAdmin said:
You honestly think that the reason why they haven't invaded Zimb to take-out Mugabe is because they have some sort of restriction from other African countries? Is that what you honestly think is stopping NATO or I am not understanding your question?
Click to expand...

Even more unbelievable.
Go look up the NA in NATO and see what it stands for.

WTF are you even doing in the current affairs section?
You have no idea about history, geography, or basically anything.

And your typing skills...
 
As far as I remember he's rotting from both ends, so here's to hoping those end meet sooner rather than later.

Mad Bob sees himself as 'president for life', whereas in a true democracy term limits are used as a mechanism to curb the potential for rotten monopolies such as his.
But then, democracy isn't something Africa has ever really understood. They all seem to want to rule 'till Jesus comes again, or so I've heard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X