Who's speaking? I'm listening now...
I'd love to phone is my my afrikaans accent is a bit thick hey.
Phillip Els?? of the commission and some media professor.
in short: they only going after the person who according to them posted methods (on here) to bypass the document. (in terms of the ECT Act)
Question I would still like answered:
The person from the commission mentioned that a main reason to prosecute is because "competitors could access each other's information".
The redacted bit are singles words and sentences inbetween long paragraphs.
Did the commission produce at least 4 different final reports that redacted each time only the info of that bank's competitors?
If not, then all the banks anyway saw each other's commercial info, and as such they would be colluding to hide the info from not each other, but their clients.