mr_norris
Expert Member
How would you have associated that with biometrics?
jennapaton said "good luck mr norris".
jennapaton said "good luck mr norris".
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
She's a friend of mine. Feel free to ask RPM to investigate on his side.
It's quite frustrating seeing biometrics getting flack because he had the lead, and now me because I do :/
All those rules DarkSpectre quoted - I follow to the tee.
Furthermore, I busted my ass coming up with and composing worthy threads and responses to existing ones.
Strange cause I never connected him to that account in my post I thought he was for biometrics.
I don't know why but I seriously doubt you would cheat to get more votes. Imho, you deserve to win this competition![]()
Agreed! I had to convince someone not to create multiple accounts to vote for my thread. I'd rather win this on merit than by stealing someone else's prize that they won through hard work.
How is this ok in general though...lol?!I can tell you now that mr_norris is not cloning accounts. We have been discussing it in private and he insists that he will not resort to such tactics, even Xiphan and I have agreed to not do such things. He is in the lead because friends are voting for him. RPM and the MyBB can check IPs for the users voting for him.
Are you a clone of someone?
Seems strange to post your first post here and vote
How is this ok in general though...lol?!
Ag I give up, its all a joke.
How is this ok in general though...lol?!
Ag I give up, its all a joke.
Think votes should be somehow restricted to just individuals that have met a minimum number of posts. Currently its too easy to get people to register and vote. Doesnt make for fair voting.
Shouldnt be on the number of friends you have, but on the value of your contribution. This whole thing should be re-looked at.
I disagree. I worked hard to get where I am, and I haven't been posting for the sole purpose of winning.
I think rpm and the team wanted to be as transparent as possible with the way they are doing the evaluation of the winning contribution. As usual, the guys in front will not question this but the guys bringing up the rear might. You will never please everyone. If it was done behind the scenes (which I reckon is the correct way), those that don't win will question the decision and scream transparency. Perhaps all competitions should seize and the forum members be consulted as to how competitions should be conducted and winners determined for future competitions.
This competition is almost complete. So quite complaining and bitching and let it go it's course.
Fair Enough. Im not just picking it with you. It should be done a bit more fairly. And Im sure that if your post/thread is good enough, youd still win.
Voting should just be open to those registered before the voting started and made posts on other pages. Not just register and just come straight here and vote. Im not saying it should only affect you. As I said, if your post is worthy, youd still win. Whoevers post is worthy, will win.
No offence intended.
Think votes should be somehow restricted to just individuals that have met a minimum number of posts. Currently its too easy to get people to register and vote. Doesnt make for fair voting.
Sounds good. Looks like mr_norris will get chucked the PS4 as it stands now. (see what I did there)I think rpm and the team wanted to be as transparent as possible with the way they are doing the evaluation of the winning contribution. As usual, the guys in front will not question this but the guys bringing up the rear might. You will never please everyone. If it was done behind the scenes (which I reckon is the correct way), those that don't win will question the decision and scream transparency. Perhaps all competitions should seize and the forum members be consulted as to how competitions should be conducted and winners determined for future competitions.
This competition is almost complete. So quite complaining and bitching and let it go it's course.
Okay, now you have confused me. The person clearly wrote there "good luck mr_norris" so how could that be tied to biometrics in any way?
Could have been used as a deflection tactic to hide their identity.
Didn't you win in the last three months or so?