Defending racist regulations and policies. Isn't that just the most diabolical thing.
I read that post and decided I wasn't even going to bother, defending the indefensible, indeed.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Defending racist regulations and policies. Isn't that just the most diabolical thing.
we had a war to get away from demographics and similar policies, and here we are, back again. I mean, did we really go anywhere?
dlk001 : Ok, granted different view points from different experiences. I am not entirely sure BEE is a failure or a success as of yet, but I do think its been implemented entirely in the wrong fashion and has been massively abused.
People with the correct skills are hired for one, but also there has been a drive for mentorship, so learners are hired and mentored into positions of responsibility. Yes its probably taken 3 or 4 years as opposed to 1 to get the right "mix" but everyone knows everyone else can do their jobs properly...
The country was doomed to failure for the past 500 years. The constant re-enforcement of racial differences of the past has left us with real problems. Sometimes you have to take a very bitter pill in order to kickstart the process of recovery from an illness. I view AA as one of those pills, very bitter but extremely potent if taken religiously.Stupidity. Hire the best person for the job. Race is meaningless and should be treated as such. The constant re-enforcement of racial differences will eventually doom this country to failure.
I wouldn't be defending it if it was not denfensible. Historical economic and social disparity is a form of discrimination which is caused by past racism, affecting the present generation through deficits in the formal education and kinds of preparation in the parents' generation, and, through unconscious racist attitudes and actions on members of the previously priviledged population.Defending racist regulations and policies. Isn't that just the most diabolical thing.
But racial differences are still being perpetuatedThe country was doomed to failure for the past 500 years. The constant re-enforcement of racial differences of the past has left us with real problems.
Well then, they've got the prescriptions wrong for those pills, cause I was considered Coloured under the old government. Tell me, what medication should I take? I am of Chinese descent, but 3rd generation South African born...Sometimes you have to take a very bitter pill in order to kickstart the process of recovery from an illness. I view AA as one of those pills, very bitter but extremely potent if taken religiously.
Screwed over by the old government, YES. Screwed over by the new, NO. How do you classify yourself? The EEA1 form calls for voluntary self-classification on the part of the employee. If an employee is "mixed race", the designation he/she volunteers must be used. If the employer must make the choice, he/she is advised to put the employee in the "designated group" category - in other words, black.But racial differences are still being perpetuated![]()
Well then, they've got the prescriptions wrong for those pills, cause I was considered Coloured under the old government. Tell me, what medication should I take? I am of Chinese descent, but 3rd generation South African born...
Screwed over by the old government, and screwed over by the new...![]()
Stupidity. Hire the best person for the job. Race is meaningless and should be treated as such. The constant re-enforcement of racial differences will eventually doom this country to failure.
I wouldn't be defending it if it was not denfensible. Historical economic and social disparity is a form of discrimination which is caused by past racism, affecting the present generation through deficits in the formal education and kinds of preparation in the parents' generation, and, through unconscious racist attitudes and actions on members of the previously priviledged population.
Screwed over by the old government, YES. Screwed over by the new, NO. How do you classify yourself? The EEA1 form calls for voluntary self-classification on the part of the employee. If an employee is "mixed race", the designation he/she volunteers must be used. If the employer must make the choice, he/she is advised to put the employee in the "designated group" category - in other words, black.
Best person for the job won't work, considering the average IQ of some races![]()
What a stupid comment.
Just because a state of equality can never be achieved does not mean that we must ignore the current state of inequality. I work in a field of risk management. There is something in this field called residual risk or acceptable level of risk. The fact that you cannot eliminate risk completely should not be a reason not to engage in risk mitigating activities. It's the same with crime level. We are forever complaining against unacceptable levels of crime. Will we ever have zero crime incidents? That's another pipe dream perhaps. But it should not stop us on our efforts to reduce crime levels.And after however many years they decide to do this little experiment for, do you really believe that South Africa will be completely equal and there will be no racial tension? That is a pipe dream.
So long as the majority blacks are not equal participants in the economic activities of the country, there can be no racial harmony. How many white employers would implement AA out of the goodness of their hearts. Well it takes legislation for employers to realise there's a inequality within their workforce.Continued racial classification - no matter how well intentioned - will increase racial tensions and discord rather then reduce it. I don't know how many times I have to say this before it gets through.
I quote form my previous postWhat if a white person classifies themselves as black? Then what? How do you determine "whiteness"?
If the employer must make the choice, he/she is advised to put the employee in the "designated group" category - in other words, black.
Just because a state of equality can never be achieved does not mean that we must ignore the current state of inequality. I work in a field of risk management. There is something in this field called residual risk or acceptable level of risk. The fact that you cannot eliminate risk completely should not be a reason not to engage in risk mitigating activities. It's the same with crime level. We are forever complaining against unacceptable levels of crime. Will we ever have zero crime incidents? That's another pipe dream perhaps. But it should not stop us on our efforts to reduce crime levels.
So long as the majority blacks are not equal participants in the economic activities of the country, there can be no racial harmony. How many white employers would implement AA out of the goodness of their hearts. Well it takes legislation for employers to realise there's a inequality within their workforce.
I quote form my previous post