It's difficult to believe any of this; especially when VC clearly makes financial gains off the back of system constraints. Naturally if the benefit passed to the customer and/or excessive OOB pricing didn't exist; the complaints would be far less.What would you want us to do that we've not already done within the constriants of the current systems?
Ps. ITO OOB affecting only a "small group"; Remember Telkom used a similar argument around their ridiculously low ADSL caps i.e. Majority of users don't need more than X -- where because of the pain / cost, users adopted patterns to avoid hitting the caps too early. The same principle applies for VC's OOB crap.
Given the choice most customers would prefer a simpler and pain free solution, which apparently VC's engineers are apparently unable to provide. As you know I don't believe this; I think it's behavior is underpinned by a marketing choice.
Btw when are you going to tell us how to turn off OOB permanently? ...and will you ever respond to my question of whether the R499 20Gb data promotion was profitable or a loss?
Last edited: