John Tempus
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2017
- Messages
- 6,121
I don't see any congestion at all during or after loadshedding. I am on the same pop as you. I am 100% certain you are on a switch that is causing that packet loss, where I am on one where I don't see it at all.
Its not the whole network like you think it is.
I am thinking you are one of the lucky few rather than me being one of the unlucky ones.
I am on group of over 200 users in brackenfell/durbanville/stellenberg/kraaifontein , basically the outskirts around where I am and whenever I have these issues they have these issues. Not a single time were our issues not at the same time since Monday. We are most definitely not on the exact same POP nor same switches remotely close to each other.
The issue with DHCP leasing is related to network congested that is caused by what everyone keep calling DHCP Storm.
I know you believe its a switch but my evidence points to it being a broad network issue independent of any specific switch but possibly isolated within certain section of the network in the area I just outlined.
You should fall in the same area, if you claim to not have any of these post loadshedding woes then you are one lucky SOB because its a reality for the majority and 100% of the people I am in communication with.
It does not get clearer than this.
Below using the static ip for reference, during the hours everyone is trying to get IP via DHCP the static ip results look like this.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.0.1 - 0 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 155.93.248.1 - 0 | 20 | 20 | 2 | 12 | 58 | 5 |
| c3h-backbone.coolideas.co.za - 25 | 8 | 6 | 554 | 579 | 602 | 588 |
| cd-backbone.coolideas.co.za - 19 | 11 | 9 | 534 | 569 | 601 | 534 |
| cloudflare.ixp.capetown - 50 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 613 | 628 | 609 |
| 154.0.5.146 - 50 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 613 | 628 | 609 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
Still on the exact same static ip and after the DHCP assignments hours played out ie. I am now actually able to get IP via DHCP, the following is the result still on the same static ip.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.0.1 - 0 | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 155.93.248.1 - 0 | 55 | 55 | 2 | 10 | 42 | 21 |
| 154.0.1.125 - 0 | 55 | 55 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 154.0.1.13 - 0 | 55 | 55 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 196.10.140.198 - 0 | 55 | 55 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1.1.1.1 - 0 | 55 | 55 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
So the control here is the same active session, obviously the same switch being used and the only difference is during and after DHCP assignments trashing the network.
I am 99.99% if not 100% certain the network is actually getting destroyed due to DHCP assignment, the evidence is crystal clear to me. The only thing that makes no sense to me would be if you have no issue at all ever to get on after loadshedding, you must have some very special wiring.
I have been able to get the exact results on tuesday night and now on wednesday night. Exactly after loadshedding and during hours on end people trying to get back onto the network.
Last edited:
