Cybersmart...:(

This month I've used 6.13gb in Nightrider time which counts as 1.23gb towards my over all cap. All those down loads have been off rapidshare...
 
Well you said you were downloading from RapidShare which AFAIK is an international site?
Quite right. So do you think it excludes local?

I just assumed it would include local as well. Always thought international cap came at a premium while local some ISP's give away. I assumed it would include local as well...
 
Last edited:
For any service related issues regarding Cybersmart may I suggest you email the MD Laurie Fialkov on [email protected]. She encourages this sort of feedback and she is very helpful...[/QUOTE]

Good grief... when I met Laurie, he was a man!
Hey Laurie, I know you're gonna read this... tell us about the operation, bwahaha:D
 
For any service related issues regarding Cybersmart may I suggest you email the MD Laurie Fialkov on [email protected]. She encourages this sort of feedback and she is very helpful...

Good grief... when I met Laurie, he was a man!
Hey Laurie, I know you're gonna read this... tell us about the operation, bwahaha:D
My bad, I assumed Laurie was female...:o
 
And if you not using Capextender?:confused:

I'm not on CapExtender so it just goes towards my cap (divided by 5 during Nightrider time).

I would imagine to download a 65gb file from Rapidshare, I'd need to buy roughly five 3gb Top-Ups.
 
I'm not on CapExtender so it just goes towards my cap (divided by 5 during Nightrider time).

I would imagine to download a 65gb file from Rapidshare, I'd need to buy roughly five 3gb Top-Ups.
Correct, I'm also not using the CapExtender. I use Nightrider and Capsaver...
 
So how is Capsaver going to aid you in downloading the 65gb file? :confused:
It won't. The files are 400 x 160mb so I down load about 90 a month between 1am-7.59am using Orbit download manager (scheduled between 1.30am-4am). I do about 20 files a week although I been topping up quite a bit...

Capsaver at the mo is a waste cause I've seldom got any bandwidth to carry over but Nightrider is saving me bombs...

I plan on down loading the files over a 5-6 month period...
 
Last edited:
I've been with CyberSmart for six months and they have been great until recently when my e-mail's started to get blocked by their spam filter. I use their e-mail to send and receive files to and from friends in SA with local cap. Let's hope I get this fixed.

They are one of only a few ISP's who aren't forcing their users through a proxy anymore
 
Nightrider....

Is that me riding off into the dark again as I hop ISPs?

I do not like being forced to upgrade packages to ensure a stable service that used to work just fine. Nah. Not me.

"Oh give me a node where the data can roam where the p2p and the torrents can play
Where seldom is heard a disconnect or reload
And the packages are reliable all day"

* Me singing to the tune of "Oh give me a home" as I mosey off into the sunset...
 
Been having horrible latencies (2000ms-3000ms + chain disconnects) recently when connecting to world of warcraft gaming server in europe with my cybersmart account. I'm positive this is a problem on cybersmart's side, because if I log into a friend's telkom account from my home, my latency is a stable 500ms-800ms, depending on time of day. Also, the telkom account results in no disconnects. I've spoken to technical support and all that they tell me is I must send in emails with my complaints and that they don't really believe the problem is on their side. I've just written email #2, after 6 days of no reply to email #1. I'm slowly counting down to canceling my cybersmart account and recommending to all others to never use this ISP. I refuse to pay for internet that is unusable and put up with slow and unproductive customer service. just my 2 cents...
 
Been having horrible latencies (2000ms-3000ms + chain disconnects) recently when connecting to world of warcraft gaming server in europe with my cybersmart account. I'm positive this is a problem on cybersmart's side, because if I log into a friend's telkom account from my home, my latency is a stable 500ms-800ms, depending on time of day. Also, the telkom account results in no disconnects. I've spoken to technical support and all that they tell me is I must send in emails with my complaints and that they don't really believe the problem is on their side. I've just written email #2, after 6 days of no reply to email #1. I'm slowly counting down to canceling my cybersmart account and recommending to all others to never use this ISP. I refuse to pay for internet that is unusable and put up with slow and unproductive customer service. just my 2 cents...

Your issue is easily explained. I've been having problems with euro sites as well lately, heavy latency.

Cybesmart is routing all their international traffic through their partners in the USA. So what is happening is all your traffic essentially goes to europe (default cable route), hops over the atlantic to the usa and then back over the atlantic again to europe. You don't need a ccie to tell you this is fubar. Cybersmart makes no mention of this move on their part and tech support is dumb or just plays dumb. Only a direct question to higher up about their routing lead to the response I was looking for.

They currently have no direct routing into europe. This will only be rectified in April according to them when the Seacom cable comes online.

This has been the situation since December. I recall previously your traffic hopped onto the saix gateway and left saix in london I think to get to europe.

You can verify this for yourself by doing a simple traceroute command or alternatively use a gui util like VisualRoute which will plot the route on a geographical map for you.

Anyone noticed slower speeds when gaming on SAIX? I'm pretty sure my latency has almost doubled recently? Anyone care to comment?

I'm gonna buy myself an axxess prepaid account to test with?

Wondering which ISP I'm moving to next?
 
Last edited:
Ok, I've been doing some tests. I took a drive to Engen and got myself a normal 3GB prepaid voucher.

I did some pings & traceroutes with my Cybersmart account and checked my Counter Strike Source latency via ping and the game gui. Then I did the same with the Axxess account.

Everything with Axxess is way faster. Cybersmart also has a lot of packet loss, experiencing between 8-27% depending on site but this is probably due to their upstream provider. My browsing experience is way better with Axxess.

As for Counter Strike Source on SGS my latency with Cybersmart was a minimum off 82ms, with Axxess it has now dropped to 57ms, thats a 25ms improvement and for gaming thats huge!

I would encourage others to do the same tests and report back here. Just test with a cheap 1GB if you don't want to take to much of a chance.

My Cybersmart days are officially over. They are the cheapest and up and till recently I have had no complaints, things however have changed. I will pay the little bit more for better connectivity. It's a shame though for this to have happened, I hope they can rectify their problems.
 
Hey Ponder

You have given me more information than I have received from Cybersmart helpdesk! They insist that there is nothing wrong with the service they are providing.

I too was happy with them since the beginning of last year. However, that all changed on the 24th of December. Since then, it has gotten progressively worse.

I have been using my brother's iBurst since Monday, and this is even WAAAAY better than Cybersmart. There is no comparison and no refresh, reload and disconnects!

Why could Cybersmart just not have told me last month about the changes? BUT, their repeating their "No problem on our side" mantra has me looking at other ISPs.

I would like to give them my month's notice at the end of Jan.

I will give the Axxess route a try or perhaps just "rent" my brother's iBurst from him until the SeaCom messiah finally arrives.

Thanks for the info... and so long Cybersmart!
 
I will give the Axxess route a try or perhaps just "rent" my brother's iBurst from him until the SeaCom messiah finally arrives.

Thanks for the info...

Axxess uses SAIX and you can see this with traceroutes so it's the same as having an account with Telkom (which I hate to support). Nice thing is you can get a prepaid voucher at any Engen or Pick 'n Pay, no accounts, don't loose your bandwidth at the end of the month.
 
Axxess uses SAIX and you can see this with traceroutes so it's the same as having an account with Telkom (which I hate to support). Nice thing is you can get a prepaid voucher at any Engen or Pick 'n Pay, no accounts, don't loose your bandwidth at the end of the month.

Just tell me this, why would you drive all the way to engen or pnp to get a voucher to topup your internet?

There are other ISPs out there, where once capped you can connect just not browse any websites except your ISPs website, and on the website you can top up without leaving the comfort of your chair/home and saving petrol in the process!
 
Your issue is easily explained. I've been having problems with euro sites as well lately, heavy latency.

Cybesmart is routing all their international traffic through their partners in the USA. So what is happening is all your traffic essentially goes to europe (default cable route), hops over the atlantic to the usa and then back over the atlantic again to europe. You don't need a ccie to tell you this is fubar. Cybersmart makes no mention of this move on their part and tech support is dumb or just plays dumb. Only a direct question to higher up about their routing lead to the response I was looking for.

They currently have no direct routing into europe. This will only be rectified in April according to them when the Seacom cable comes online.

This has been the situation since December. I recall previously your traffic hopped onto the saix gateway and left saix in london I think to get to europe.

You can verify this for yourself by doing a simple traceroute command or alternatively use a gui util like VisualRoute which will plot the route on a geographical map for you.

Anyone noticed slower speeds when gaming on SAIX? I'm pretty sure my latency has almost doubled recently? Anyone care to comment?

I'm gonna buy myself an axxess prepaid account to test with?

Wondering which ISP I'm moving to next?
Oh wow this is horrible, makes no sense as to why they are doing this. Out of interest sake I actually went out to test this, as I do have access to a box in Europe.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.cybersmart.co.za

Tracing route to www.cybersmart.co.za [196.41.124.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 217.170.21.1
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms vl265.mpd01.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [149.6.128.29]
3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms te3-2.ccr02.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.3.61]
4 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms te3-1.ccr01.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.38]
5 80 ms 80 ms 81 ms te2-2.ccr01.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.105]
6 87 ms 87 ms 87 ms te9-2.mpd02.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.1.141]
7 120 ms 113 ms 126 ms te3-2.mpd02.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.5.53]
8 113 ms 113 ms 113 ms te8-1.mpd01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.2.141]
9 115 ms 114 ms 113 ms 38.20.43.122
10 123 ms 123 ms 124 ms 38.104.60.78
11 114 ms 114 ms 115 ms backbone.fiberstorm.com [69.80.233.133]
12 124 ms 129 ms 123 ms cybersmart.cust.hou02.fiberstorm.alphared.com [69.80.226.58]
13 403 ms 399 ms 400 ms cybersmart-alphared-gateway.cybersmart.co.za [196.6.121.1]
14 420 ms 424 ms 424 ms 196.41.124.12-backbone2.cybersmart.co.za [196.41.124.12]

Trace complete.

Pretty stupid but they must somehow save money otherwise I can't see how any ISP could say this is for the best for their clients.

80ms clearly seems like a jump to the US, then it jumps up another 40ms probably to get to the gateway that cybersmart make use of in the US, and then ends up at 420ms!! That is almost as bad as satellite traffic. Anyways above was on a idle 10mbite line.

Now lets look at a proper traceroute from SA to Europe. Unfortunately this line was busy cant do anything about that.

server ~ # traceroute www.wow-europe.com
traceroute to wow-europe.com (80.239.186.22), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 13.446 ms 0.110 ms 0.124 ms
2 0.538 ms 0.672 ms 2.284 ms
3 1.782 ms 1.212 ms 1.487 ms
4 9.676 ms 2.186 ms 2.235 ms
5 3.073 ms 2.576 ms 3.808 ms
6 ge8-0-0.gw1.cpt1.alter.net (196.30.176.33) 2.574 ms 4.753 ms 2.154 ms
7 srp5-0-0.cr2.cpt1.alter.net (196.31.249.69) 3.589 ms srp5-0-0.cr1.cpt1.alter.net (196.31.249.68) 51.888 ms srp5-0-0.cr2.cpt1.alter.net (196.31.249.69) 4.550 ms
8 t30-0-3.cr1.lnd19.alter.net (196.30.229.221) 155.114 ms other-side.s1-0-0.cr1.cpt1.alter.net (196.30.229.238) 171.161 ms 155.693 ms
9 ge7-0-1.ir1.lnd19.alter.net (196.30.229.201) 167.191 ms 157.479 ms 157.588 ms
10 202.GE1-3.gw10.lnd10.alter.net (158.43.23.53) 156.302 ms 158.076 ms 167.808 ms
11 so-1-1-3.XR1.LND9.ALTER.NET (158.43.253.134) 169.763 ms 155.542 ms 154.573 ms
12 pos2-0.br1.par2.alter.net (146.188.8.118) 174.327 ms 180.539 ms 161.870 ms
13 prs-b1-link.telia.net (213.248.100.125) 167.126 ms 162.903 ms 178.379 ms
14 prs-rosy-s50.telia.net (80.91.251.90) 164.145 ms 167.120 ms 165.461 ms
15 * * *
Obviously blizzard blocks ICMP.

Lets do it to the same box I was doing a trace from to Cybersmart

server ~ # traceroute 193.138.205.32
traceroute to 193.138.205.32, 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 0.313 ms 0.126 ms 0.126 ms
2 0.541 ms 0.530 ms 0.242 ms
3 0.915 ms 1.539 ms 0.469 ms
4 2.958 ms 0.820 ms 1.694 ms
5 2.841 ms 1.651 ms 3.981 ms
6 ge5-0-0.gw2.cpt1.alter.net (196.30.176.34) 4.072 ms 3.578 ms 3.553 ms
7 srp5-0-0.cr1.cpt1.alter.net (196.31.249.68) 57.704 ms srp5-0-0.cr2.cpt1.alter.net (196.31.249.69) 4.049 ms srp5-0-0.cr1.cpt1.alter.net (196.31.249.68) 131.497 ms
8 other-side.s6-1-1.cr2.cpt1.alter.net (196.30.229.221) 155.104 ms other-side.s1-0-0.cr1.cpt1.alter.net (196.30.229.238) 155.660 ms t30-0-3.cr1.lnd19.alter.net (196.30.229.221) 155.202 ms
9 ge7-0-1.ir1.lnd19.alter.net (196.30.229.201) 168.738 ms 156.315 ms 158.524 ms
10 202.ge1-3.gw10.lnd10.alter.net (158.43.23.53) 155.985 ms 154.709 ms 158.036 ms
11 so-1-1-3.xr1.lnd9.alter.net (158.43.253.134) 154.456 ms 168.434 ms 164.470 ms
12 pos1-0.br1.ams3.alter.net (146.188.3.214) 170.689 ms 164.182 ms 162.371 ms
13 so2-0-1-155m.ar1.ams1.gblx.net (208.50.13.161) 161.645 ms 162.321 ms 171.708 ms
14 te4-2-10g.ar4.ams2.gblx.net (67.17.64.46) 173.492 ms 162.742 ms 160.126 ms
15 64.209.106.74 (64.209.106.74) 233.447 ms 234.076 ms 237.474 ms
16 193.138.207.253 (193.138.207.253) 242.077 ms 255.058 ms 243.359 ms
^C
Not the best either but hey its on a busy line with a drop of 160ms (which could be the round trip between US-EU and back).
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X