We are now getting to the real problem. What is a black African person as opposed to a coloured or Indian person? Let's look into the absurdity in trying to define such a person (the following was not meant to offend anyone, please pardon me if I use incorrect terms):
A certain person was a struggle patriot and is black in colour, he is also known as a Xhosa. That's on paper, he does he prove it? Does he have to prove it? How far does he have to prove his lineage? If his grandmother (or great-grandmother) was not a Xhosa (white, coloured, whatever) - does this mean that this person is not "pure" black any more? In future, what % of non-black in one's lineage will still be acceptable - 8%, 16%? The question is - is a 100% black more worthy of BEE help than a 50% black (also known as a Coloured in SA)? And 80%?
Trying to define and a "pure" African black is madness and smacks of the same mad thinking of the Hitler era and the promotion of the "pure" white (Aryan) race.......
While we are on the subject - what is an Indian person? How does one prove this? Lineage how far back? Grandmother or great-grandmother not "Indian", etc. Pure madness........
I see a future where a means test is the only thing that determines whether a person is worthy of BEE support. For the rest of us it should be the economic principles of supply and demand.