Fires in Australia

Many people are starting to put blame on green peace movements for forcing the Australian government to outlaw controlled firebreaks.
Around half of the 10s of thousands of bush fires in aus are arson... given current 'we will be dead in 10 years' crowd, wouldn't be surprised... will see what the people on the ground think
 
Around half of the 10s of thousands of bush fires in aus are arson... given current 'we will be dead in 10 years' crowd, wouldn't be surprised... will see what the people on the ground think
Are the greenies setting the fires to make the climate change message come across stronger?

/tinfoil
 
There is a certain irony in greenies setting fires to make people go green..... but yeah they nuts so won't put it past them either.

Makes me think of the recent bushfires we had here..... almost all of them started by either EFF or ANC agents to destabilize DA regions from what I remember.
 
Australia's most prominent climate scientist.....

Australia-climate.jpg

No.
He's a mammologist and palaeontologist who served as a commissioner on a climate commission... but even if he was a prominent climate scientist it wouldn't matter.
When making irrelevant points at least get the facts straight.

Tons of people make stupid statements about climate change so we can play this game all day, it makes no difference to the actual scientific literature on the topic.
If you really want to prove a point then find us a proper peer-reviewed and accepted paper that made these kinds of predictions so we can all laugh together.
 
No.
He's a mammologist and palaeontologist who served as a commissioner on a climate commission... but even if he was a prominent climate scientist it wouldn't matter.
When making irrelevant points at least get the facts straight.

But CNN....


Oh and he was chief commissioner of the Climate Commission formed by the labour government in 2011. Are you saying predictions made by an individual who held such a important post doesn't matter and should be dismissed?


On 10 February 2011, Flannery was appointed as the Chief Commissioner of the Climate Commission by the Australian Government. The Commission was a panel of leading scientists and business experts whose mandate was to provide an "independent and reliable" source of information for all Australians.[20]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Flannery#cite_note-About-20

Flannery was named Australian Humanist of the Year in 2005, and Australian of the Year in 2007. Until mid-2013 he was a professor at Macquarie University and held the Panasonic Chair in Environmental Sustainability.[7] He was also chairman of the Copenhagen Climate Council, an international group of business and other leaders that coordinated a business response to climate change and assisted the Danish government in the lead up to COP 15.[8] In 2015, the Jack P. Blaney Award for Dialogue recognized Tim Flannery for using dialogue and authentic engagement to build global consensus for action around climate change.[9] His sometimes controversial views on shutting down conventional coal-fired power stations for electricity generation in the medium term are frequently cited in the media.

 
Last edited:
All that global warming that would result from this. Lets compare the CO2 released into the air by the fire to that of human activity.

The fires are estimated to have thus far emitted 2/3 of Australia's annual man made emissions

 
I've never been a climate change denier. If you pump material into the atmosphere with a higher optic density you are destabilising a system. Heat gets trapped and CO2 buildup accelerates. I don't think it's not a serious problem the world shouldn't address.

However.

I am a "Carbotaxwillfixeverything" denier,
a "Theworldwillendin15years" denier
and a "Firesaretheresultofclimatechange" denier.

Over a 800 year period Australia has become a drier country. There is no baseline control to indicate that this wouldn't have happened if you eliminate human induced heating throughout this period on a global level. Many and I mean nearly all crazies call the above statement climate change denial and it isn't. It's being sceptical of a very specific claim.

This is my issue with the whole doomsday crowd. A long track tornado can tear its way through Roodepoort and they'll point to climate change. It's absurd. And if it happens again 2 years later they'll use it as confirmation. Yet these events actually do happen occasionally and might seem like strange coincidences to the inexperienced. Not the scientists actually measuring warming and doing the real work though, the crazies who's life has been cared for in such a manner that any event or change from their content tranquil environments is somehow out of the ordinary.
 
I've never been a climate change denier. If you pump material into the atmosphere with a higher optic density you are destabilising a system. Heat gets trapped and CO2 buildup accelerates. I don't think it's not a serious problem the world shouldn't address.

However.

I am a "Carbotaxwillfixeverything" denier,
a "Theworldwillendin15years" denier
and a "Firesaretheresultofclimatechange" denier.

Over a 800 year period Australia has become a drier country. There is no baseline control to indicate that this wouldn't have happened if you eliminate human induced heating throughout this period on a global level. Many and I mean nearly all crazies call the above statement climate change denial and it isn't. It's being sceptical of a very specific claim.

This is my issue with the whole doomsday crowd. A long track tornado can tear its way through Roodepoort and they'll point to climate change. It's absurd. And if it happens again 2 years later they'll use it as confirmation. Yet these events actually do happen occasionally and might seem like strange coincidences to the inexperienced. Not the scientists actually measuring warming and doing the real work though, the crazies who's life has been cared for in such a manner that any event or change from their content tranquil environments is somehow out of the ordinary.
The hottest day in recorded history is not a temperature that happens every few years, neither is it normal. Each time it happens is the first time it's reached that temp. In Australia that day was the 17th December 2019. Next time the hottest day is recorded will be this year, 2020, with an even higher temperature. Combined with the many other extreme, and unusual, weather conditions around the world this past year, including record breaking heatwaves in Europe, the strongest hurricane in recorded history, devastating floods, etc - you would really have to have your head in the sand to dismiss it all as normal and just coincidence. Not out of the ordinary at all, no.
 
The hottest day in recorded history is not a temperature that happens every few years, neither is it normal. Each time it happens is the first time it's reached that temp. In Australia that day was the 17th December 2019. Next time the hottest day is recorded will be this year, 2020, with an even higher temperature. Combined with the many other extreme, and unusual, weather conditions around the world this past year, including record breaking heatwaves in Europe, the strongest hurricane in recorded history, devastating floods, etc - you would really have to have your head in the sand to dismiss it all as normal and just coincidence. Not out of the ordinary at all, no.

Sure you'll get hotter and hotter days for many years to come, especially globally. And climate change is responsible. BTW the hottest day recorded in Australia was 1960 and the bushfires then? So tell me what does this have to do with the fires? Is there a control you can measure the drought situation Australia is in without human induced climate change?

This is not a claim but it's to explain how disconnected these events can be: For all you know the humidity in Australia might have been even lower and rainfall patterns even worse if the global temperature didn't increase (no human activity).

The question is if you're so confident about these claims (which scientists with some self respect at least aren't making) why is there no prediction model? How will Angola's climate look within the next 20 years? Hot dry, Hot humid? Crazy storms? Complete desert?
 
No.
He's a mammologist and palaeontologist who served as a commissioner on a climate commission... but even if he was a prominent climate scientist it wouldn't matter.
When making irrelevant points at least get the facts straight.

Tons of people make stupid statements about climate change so we can play this game all day, it makes no difference to the actual scientific literature on the topic.
If you really want to prove a point then find us a proper peer-reviewed and accepted paper that made these kinds of predictions so we can all laugh together.

I'm sorry, you believe that's what most people will actually make us of?

Trump (10 seconds later): fake news!

Seriously though, to reach the masses you're going to need more than peer-reviewed articles (though making reference to them would aid your argument) but something more persuasive. Be it Greta Thunberg, Tim Flannery, Bill Nye or Jennifer Aniston (Russell Crowe) - you need someone that the masses can actually relate to to push this message.
 
Sure you'll get hotter and hotter days for many years to come, especially globally. And climate change is responsible. BTW the hottest day recorded in Australia was 1960 and the bushfires then? So tell me what does this have to do with the fires? Is there a control you can measure the drought situation Australia is in without human induced climate change?

This is not a claim but it's to explain how disconnected these events can be: For all you know the humidity in Australia might have been even lower and rainfall patterns even worse if the global temperature didn't increase (no human activity).

The question is if you're so confident about these claims (which scientists with some self respect at least aren't making) why is there no prediction model? How will Angola's climate look within the next 20 years? Hot dry, Hot humid? Crazy storms? Complete desert?

No, that was the hottest recorded temperature. The hottest recorded day was this summer. You don't evaluate change on the basis of a single event, but the impact overall.
 
The hottest day in recorded history is not a temperature that happens every few years, neither is it normal. Each time it happens is the first time it's reached that temp. In Australia that day was the 17th December 2019. Next time the hottest day is recorded will be this year, 2020, with an even higher temperature. Combined with the many other extreme, and unusual, weather conditions around the world this past year, including record breaking heatwaves in Europe, the strongest hurricane in recorded history, devastating floods, etc - you would really have to have your head in the sand to dismiss it all as normal and just coincidence. Not out of the ordinary at all, no.

(20 seconds later): fake news!

d9gqh7w-456aa30a-1409-46f1-b2d0-3361f1ca93ce.gif
 
The hottest day in recorded history is not a temperature that happens every few years, neither is it normal. Each time it happens is the first time it's reached that temp. In Australia that day was the 17th December 2019. Next time the hottest day is recorded will be this year, 2020, with an even higher temperature. Combined with the many other extreme, and unusual, weather conditions around the world this past year, including record breaking heatwaves in Europe, the strongest hurricane in recorded history, devastating floods, etc - you would really have to have your head in the sand to dismiss it all as normal and just coincidence. Not out of the ordinary at all, no.

A good way to quantify what's happening is to just think about the additional energy involved globally when taking carbon flux into account... and of course, that energy is what's driving hurricanes, tornados etc. etc. it really is as simple as that.

I know there are lots of crazies out there but the thing is, there's nothing wrong with being concerned. We're in for one helluva ride in the coming decades.

This video from Thunderf00t is a pretty awesome and unique way of quantifying why changing the atmosphere even just a little bit makes such a huge difference.

 
But CNN....


Oh and he was chief commissioner of the Climate Commission formed by the labour government in 2011. Are you saying predictions made by an individual who held such a important post doesn't matter and should be dismissed?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Flannery#cite_note-About-20




The mammologist formed his climate warrior group by soliciting millions in donations to pay for his hotel bill's, flights around the world etc. An added bonus is getting to mix with celebs around the world.

Activism is an awesome way to make a living.

I wonder what will become of him if his climate claims turn out to be incorrect?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X