Gone with DStv

Lucifer ?
Probably that one, I remember they moved it to a late night time slot but eventually pulled it entirely after a couple episodes
Too many really bad African pastor channels there, spraying Doom and driving Evil Spirits out of their congregants. Rather point it to another bird with better content.
Those need to be banned
 
In my opinion DSTV are the racists in the manner that they are handling the Steve Ofmeyer situation. How many politicians and other black people have made terrible racist comments against the white population? Yet none of this was ever suggested against them! Why now against Steve? Because he is white? DSTV must be careful because this situation might backlash against them in due time as I believe they are upsetting a lot of people. I hope that some wealthy business man would start a new, non partisan TV station. Their basket prices are exhobirant considering what they offer the public.
That be the truth right there....
 
I think the worst think I heard is that silencing Steve Hofmeyr is an attack on Afrikaans people. People are essentially admitting they share his views and implying that racism is part of Afrikaans identity.
 
In my opinion DSTV are the racists in the manner that they are handling the Steve Ofmeyer situation. How many politicians and other black people have made terrible racist comments against the white population? Yet none of this was ever suggested against them! Why now against Steve? Because he is white? DSTV must be careful because this situation might backlash against them in due time as I believe they are upsetting a lot of people. I hope that some wealthy business man would start a new, non partisan TV station. Their basket prices are exhobirant considering what they offer the public.

So here is the difference, BLF and EFF - disgusting as their views are, they are politicians. The same as Donald Trump was able to spew that garbage during his campaign, same applies here. If Julius and Trump were PRIVATE CITIZENS expressing those views in a PRIVATE CAPACITY, it would be hate speech and equality courts would be all over them. If Hofmeyer wants to spread a message that black people were the architects of apartheid, he must form a political party and see if he can get into parliament with that rhetoric
 
So interesting that people didn't have this reaction when ANN7 was cancelled because of their propaganda views. Can't see the forest from the trees
 
The answer is no they have never banned any other content.
They are behaving exactly like Facebook and Twitter now. Banning someone who doesnt agree with their agenda
I hope they get taken to court over it.
Same as fb and Twitter banning conservatives so close to an election

They banned ANN7. didn't see people complaining then
 
ANN7 was not banned. MC carried that channel on contract and did not renew the contract when it terminated. At least there was a very good reason, based on plenty of evidence of all sorts of illegalities affecting ANN7.
So here is the problem, get your facts straight, review the lead up to the ANN7 contract expiring and then come back.

This example is censorship of an individual which MC is not empowered to do. If he had been found guilty of racism or hate speech, then MC would have been within their rights to ban his content, not before. MC is nothing but another example of an entity taking the law into its own hands.
 
Last edited:
What a complete and total doosh, but what about the Bill Cosby show (the white kid is consistently portrayed as stupid) and Eddie Murphy (who in his movies consistently portrays white people as stupid). There are many more racists who need sanctions, if that is the real reason for the MC ban. They are totally inconsistent, and one wonders what their real reasons are for pandering to racist black people.
Do not forget Harvey Weisntein? So woman abuse or sexual misconduct is ok?
 
IF MC was to take a strong line of abuse against women, it would have to stop broadcasting just about the entire output of Hollywood. When last have you seen an action movie without a sex scene and or a rape scene included? So to be consistent, MC would have to go out of business.
 
Last edited:
ANN7 was not banned. MC carried that channel on contract and did not renew the contract when it terminated. At least there was a very good reason, based on plenty of evidence of all sorts of illegalities affecting ANN7.
So here is the problem, get your facts straight, review the lead up to the ANN7 contract expiring and then come back.

This example is censorship of an individual which MC is not empowered to do. If he had been found guilty of racism or hate speech, then MC would have been within their rights to ban his content, not before. MC is nothing but another example of an entity taking the law into its own hands.

MultiChoice planned on renewing ANN7's contract until public opinion turned against them with the whole Gupta saga, this was widely reported. It was the pressure of the public against the channel that eventually led to the channel being let go. The ANN7 situation is actually a much better case study for censorship because they were literally silencing a member of the press
 
I think the worst think I heard is that silencing Steve Hofmeyr is an attack on Afrikaans people. People are essentially admitting they share his views and implying that racism is part of Afrikaans identity.
Another one who can't understand the difference between being an ardent supporter and being against censorship. Still waiting for anyone to prove it's racism. Also it's very much an attack on Afrikaans people. I don't see other people being affected by it besides those that appear with him.

Funny how all of the new accounts, single purpose accounts, and one post wonders are suddenly popping up in support of MC's actions. That says a lot more about them and their supporters than about the Steve supporters.

So here is the difference, BLF and EFF - disgusting as their views are, they are politicians. The same as Donald Trump was able to spew that garbage during his campaign, same applies here. If Julius and Trump were PRIVATE CITIZENS expressing those views in a PRIVATE CAPACITY, it would be hate speech and equality courts would be all over them. If Hofmeyer wants to spread a message that black people were the architects of apartheid, he must form a political party and see if he can get into parliament with that rhetoric
Plenty of examples of black private individuals who spread racism yet get off with a slap on the wrist. If I'm not mistaken one or two were actually MC employees in a way yet nothing happened to them.

Again I draw attention to the fact. First person with a R150k fine a white women. First person to get a 3 year prison sentence for crimen injuria again a white woman. Sadly I don't expect the same ruling to ever apply to blacks.

MultiChoice planned on renewing ANN7's contract until public opinion turned against them with the whole Gupta saga, this was widely reported. It was the pressure of the public against the channel that eventually led to the channel being let go. The ANN7 situation is actually a much better case study for censorship because they were literally silencing a member of the press
For good reason. ANN7 was directly using MC to spread propaganda. It became a liability from a financial perspective. There was also allegations of irregularities both with the initial contract and the renewal. Compare apples to apples.
 
Calvo Mawela is the CEO of Multichoice. His wife is Nombasa Mantashe, the daughter of Gwede Mantashe, who is the national chairperson of the ANC and Minister of Mineral Resources (formerly the ANC Secretary General). It is clear where the political meddling comes from.
Ding Ding Ding. I think we found the link of the sudden piracy concern & "Netflix regulation"
 
So interesting that people didn't have this reaction when ANN7 was cancelled because of their propaganda views. Can't see the forest from the trees
ANN7 was not banned. MC carried that channel on contract and did not renew the contract when it terminated. At least there was a very good reason, based on plenty of evidence of all sorts of illegalities affecting ANN7.
So here is the problem, get your facts straight, review the lead up to the ANN7 contract expiring and then come back.

This example is censorship of an individual which MC is not empowered to do. If he had been found guilty of racism or hate speech, then MC would have been within their rights to ban his content, not before. MC is nothing but another example of an entity taking the law into its own hands.
Some of the people here have selective memory.

DSTV did not cave into public pressure regarding ANN7, they waited out the contractual period, no bank wanted to touch the Guptas, they were even unable to pay salaries.

The Gupta ship was sinking at the time & ownership was eventually transferred to Jimmy Myani.

DSTV gave zero ****s about that petition that requested the removal of ANN7 or the many people voicing their opinions.

DSTV would have continued broadcasting ANN7 if the Gupta empire still had influence in SA.

Don't get it twisted. Dstv is hardly the moral compass of SA.
 
If this Steve oke was facing charges from the Human Rights Council thingy, then I get it.

Anyway, I don't care about that anymore.

Is anyone else concerned about alleged close relationship between Multichoice CEO & the ANC?

How does this shape our internet laws?

Will sport rights truely be more competitive?

Will future regulation be affected?

and Does anyone else see the government buying a piece of the pie @ DSTV.

Dstv will eventually be dumped by their parent company.

Why am I sensing a closer relationship with the government?
 
MC is listed separately from Naspers already. A move quite a few of us predicted 3 years ago already when the rot started to set in. Many of us on the old MC forum were getting increasingly P22ssed off by the laxisidasical tendencies emerging in how the decoder upgrades were being handled, and the terrible shortcuts that were starting to be taken on operational issues. Pretty hotly debated privately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swa
Another one who can't understand the difference between being an ardent supporter and being against censorship. Still waiting for anyone to prove it's racism. Also it's very much an attack on Afrikaans people. I don't see other people being affected by it besides those that appear with him.

Funny how all of the new accounts, single purpose accounts, and one post wonders are suddenly popping up in support of MC's actions. That says a lot more about them and their supporters than about the Steve supporters.


Plenty of examples of black private individuals who spread racism yet get off with a slap on the wrist. If I'm not mistaken one or two were actually MC employees in a way yet nothing happened to them.

Again I draw attention to the fact. First person with a R150k fine a white women. First person to get a 3 year prison sentence for crimen injuria again a white woman. Sadly I don't expect the same ruling to ever apply to blacks.


For good reason. ANN7 was directly using MC to spread propaganda. It became a liability from a financial perspective. There was also allegations of irregularities both with the initial contract and the renewal. Compare apples to apples.
Funny, I have seen more new accounts on here that are supporting Steve than those who are not.
 
I do think mulitchoice is an complete ashols treating people this way. They make bilions of money but as steve''s my Dstv will also go!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X