R1M Shortfall jeopardises e-tolling Court Challenge
In April 2012, OUTA interdicted the introduction of eTolls and again in January 2013, won the right to have their case heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). These critical victories ensured that motorists around the country were saved from paying eTolls and more importantly, sets the scene for OUTA’s ultimate intention, to prevent the introduction of an irrational and inefficient collection scheme whose costs are almost as much as the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP) itself.
More recently, the City of Cape Town won their court case against SANRAL, confirming that Tolling of our urban freeways is now a national issue and that SANRAL’s approach to this process requires greater transparency, better engagement with the public and more scrutiny of their research and facts. Indeed, few campaigns in our new democracy have rallied so many political, labour, religious, business and civil groups around the opposition to one singular issue.
OUTA continues to remind the authorities that no one is questioning the need for upgraded freeways or the fact that benefits are derived from reduced traffic congestion. Nor does OUTA suggest that society is opposed to paying for road upgrades. What remains at the heart of this issue is the lack of constitutional requirements for meaningful public participation and the irrationality of applying an extremely costly, burdensome and inefficient means of revenue collection through eTolling.
The eToll challenge also has a number of human rights issues, not least of all for people with mobility impairments who rely on the goodwill of family, friends, neighbours and their communities that assist them to move around or seek employment. Their situation and quality of life will be seriously compromised by eTolls and both Government and SANRAL have ignored this vulnerable minority group during the planning of the eToll scheme.
OUTA believes there is still time for the Government to rethink this plan and suspend eTolling, while the best possible solution with the lowest negative impact on road users is found. Amidst a climate of overwhelming public rejection and continuing legal action, SANRAL appears committed to launching eTolling, some two months before the court appeal. Despite SANRAL’s utterances that OUTA’s current legal action is of no consequence to them, should the Supreme Court rule in OUTA’s favour, their plans for eTolling could very well be halted.
http://www.outa.co.za/site/r1mil-shortfall-jeopardises-etoll-court-challenge/