The two companies are also competing for talent in AI and cloud infrastructure, two key future battlegrounds.
Someone what to explain how Apple is competing with Microsoft in the cloud infrastructure?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The two companies are also competing for talent in AI and cloud infrastructure, two key future battlegrounds.
Someone may have background info that Apple plans to secretly launch a cloud offering?Someone what to explain how Apple is competing with Microsoft in the cloud infrastructure?

Not in cloud infrastructure, talent for cloud infrastructure.Someone what to explain how Apple is competing with Microsoft in the cloud infrastructure?
They don’t want the market. It’s not affordability it’s about experience.Apple would obliterate the PC market if the dropped their pricing.
Maybe i am ignorant and dont understand their business properly, but if they do make their devices more affordable they can capture the market. And if their products are really that great, people wouldn't make the move back to pc, and would prefer to pay a premium for a premium product in the longer run.
I’ve migrated all my workloads to Apple for anything mobile and retained a Windows desktop. I used to run parallels with Windows on OSX but with Visual Studio, Azure Data Studio and Office all native on OSX there’s no reason anymore for me to boot it hence the decision to go M1. I haven’t touched a top spec XPS I have since I bought M1 MBP
Even with Apple Care, Macbooks are fundamentally not as good when it comes to long-term use, recovery, and repairs.
If your SSD on an M1 dies and you didn't make backups, you can't recover that data. If one part of the motherboard dies like a Thunderbolt IC, Apple won't perform board level repairs on it - they just replace it. If you need a new keyboard, the entire shell has to be replaced. If the ribbon cable connecting the display is broken, you have to replace the whole display because everything is glued in place.
Despite their attractive design and high integration with Apple's ecosystem, I shy away from recommending modern Macbooks unless someone needs Final Cut or some other macOS-only software that is part of their workflow. If the budget is constrained, I recommend refurb or ex-rental business notebooks that have spares readily available.
Edit: I also only recommend Macbooks when the client needs a bright, mostly colour-accurate display for photo and video work. There are use-cases that only Apple covers where they don't have any competition.
Apple would obliterate the PC market if the dropped their pricing.
Maybe i am ignorant and dont understand their business properly, but if they do make their devices more affordable they can capture the market. And if their products are really that great, people wouldn't make the move back to pc, and would prefer to pay a premium for a premium product in the longer run.
Well, with iCare (which is a local thing, not Apple Care) you can always ensure that you're fully covered. So that's pretty good with regards to 'long-term use, recovery and repairs'.
In this day and age, no one should have local-only copies of files. All my stuff is in Google Drive and iCloud. If my Mac blew up I'd just have to install my apps again.
I do keep tabs on people like Louis Rossmann and his fight for Right to Repair. So I know Apple could do a million times better in this department. But it's a shortcoming that can be mitigated with warranties.
MacBooks aren't just great for the quality of the display. The battery life is reason enough to go with them. Instead of worrying about inverters or generators or whatever, you enjoy a laptop with enough battery life to easily make it through any amount of load shedding and unplanned blackouts you're likely to experience.
I suppose I'd also feel differently about this if I had higher spending power, like consumers in the USA do, because they have actual iStores not run by Core Group with proper product support.
Was looking at something like this earlier https://www.takealot.com/msi-gl65-l...gb-15-6-fhd-gaming-notebook-blac/PLID71334749 currently R18k... rdr2 should be "playable". Can't say that for the M1 Mac.
I agree on the part about consoles and I already have an older Xbox + Gamepass but I would not take it on the road with me.
I'm interested to know.Very hollistic view where it loses badly.
Plastic Case
Crap Battery Life
Low Resolution Screen
Crap trackpad and likely keyboard as well.
****ing ugly.
It’s nowhere in the same ballpark for the money spent.
It’s electron so it really isn’t ‘native’. It just isn’t compiled for ARM.Data Studio is not native yet...unless I missed something?
View attachment 1069177
It's one of the few programs I have issues with on M1 (need to restart the app every now and then). VSCode runs native though
I'm interested to know.
Did you deploy this ton of Macbooks to a developer house or a normal office (small or large scale?)
Would it be completely unfeasible to use it in the Cloud?80% developers.
Rest are typical business requirements like finance and HR etc which in the past we gave Airs and decided wasn’t worth the price difference before the M1 with the Intels sucking a bit and just gave them Pros.
Now with the M1 Airs being so good we are changing our minds about that and also in a test phase to roll them out to our customer services agents but likely only in new locations for now and then everybody at once who is currently on a newish machine.
Would it be completely unfeasible to use it in the Cloud?
It looks to be a hell of a lot cheaper.
Access via RDP could be done with a very low spec PC or thin/client.
Why is the actual hardware and physical device required?
Microsoft and Apple rivalry heats up
Can't you get something with a better gpu and upgradable RAM at 18k? Sure, whilst sacrificing massively in the other areas the MBA excels in. The 8GB of memory in the Air is sufficient for most people, and from my experience is definitely not comparable to having 8GB of memory with Windows. I...mybroadband.co.za
I understand that Windows does not fit your needs. I'm also able to to manage and deploy Windows and Linux PCs, including security requirements.We have toyed with the idea of going virtual PC especially with contractors and maybe at a stretch customer services.
We are very cloud centric and actually have no local infrastructure other than networking, so a large part of the equation for us is device management and security something Windows simply doesn’t offer us across the various brands and too many SKU’s and variables.
Apple’s DEP system is magical and especially with remote work now we can onboard someone by simply shipping a machine directly to them and once they connect it to WiFi it self deploys with everything they need and we never needed to touch it.
With the Macs we manage them all in one place and can remotely lock and wipe them with ease and not a single worry about whether they can be recovered.
They are of course also a lot more malware and virus resistant which is a big part of that equation.
If we were to ever consider a switch it would be Ubuntu and not Windows, because we work natively in *nix for everything.
There literally is no place for Windows in our business.
***
We do actually have a few Mac Stadium instances for logistical reasons as well.
No. It kills your soul as a dev to code in a remote VM.Isn't it more financially sound and feasible to develop in the Cloud and save costs by not buying so much Apple kit?
No. It kills your soul as a dev to code in a remote VM.
You hire good people and let them figure out how to work within constraints, you don’t tell them how to work.
Physical Non-VM Mac ServerGood luck trying to get a bunch of developers to do their work on a cloud instance with over 200ms. Sounds like an absolute horrible experience. FML
I understand that Windows does not fit your needs. I'm also able to to manage and deploy Windows and Linux PCs, including security requirements.
I'm not understanding the capital expenditure? Even 10 or 20 Macbooks is a shtload of money.
A Nix client with RDP software could initiate a script upon startup to boot into the Cloud edition. Which isn't a VM,, as the link I provided shows.
Isn't it more financially sound and feasible to develop in the Cloud and save costs by not buying so much Apple kit?