Lupus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2006
- Messages
- 91,438
- Reaction score
- 62,039
But you're paying R350 you want the sports you watch and only you watchLucky packet?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
But you're paying R350 you want the sports you watch and only you watchLucky packet?
Whaaaaat...The problem is that the price you're paying now is subsidised by the 500 other channels. Take that away like PPV where you pay R1000 for a boxing match.
View attachment 1725073
It's streaming so channel is probably the incorrect word.1 channel for R350? Which sport would you like it to show you? Would need to depend on the rights and their costs though?
But how would they pay for the rights? Same story for R350 you can pick either you get top class rugby, maybe F1, maybe soccer, maybe tennis. Remember they have to pay for the rights, it's not free and they don't dictate the costs.It's streaming so channel is probably the incorrect word.
One concurrent connection with everything 'possible' on.
Obviously if there is something that they can't control like UFC for $80 then there is nothing they can do but pass that on.
Remember SABC Sport?Lucky packet?
Top Sports was brilliant, they had F1 GP, I could watch it for free on my little black and white telly while working.Remember SABC Sport?
But how would they pay for the rights? Same story for R350 you can pick either you get top class rugby, maybe F1, maybe soccer, maybe tennis. Remember they have to pay for the rights, it's not free and they don't dictate the costs.
Remember SABC Sport?
You mean all broadcasters created the trend? Cause that's how it works, broadcasters buy the rights so they can say look I have the rights to this sportThey created the trend, way back when they thought they where clever, and the world economy was on an up. Now it is on a slump, it is biting them hard.
They should cover their costs, selling broadcast rights to other local Sub- Saharan broadcasters, and advertising. We should be the gravy/cherry on top. Not the main source of revenue.
Weren't the 90's great?Top Sports was brilliant, they had F1 GP, I could watch it for free on my little black and white telly while working.
Such a time, even the early 2000sWeren't the 90's great?
They should bring back 4 streams so a normal family of 4 can watch their TV in peace and DSTV will increase their premium subscribers overnight.They created the trend, way back when they thought they where clever, and the world economy was on an up. Now it is on a slump, it is biting them hard.
They should cover their costs, selling broadcast rights to other local Sub- Saharan broadcasters, and advertising. We should be the gravy/cherry on top. Not the main source of revenue.
That is actually a good idea, but isn't it limited to streams for live?They should bring back 4 streams so a normal family of 4 can watch their TV in peace and DSTV will increase their premium subscribers overnight.
Stuff 25 years ago I think.What is/was that?
I am sure if they stopped buying the rights the sellers would be willing to sell them for less. I doubt they'd just say, **** the millions in Africa, we don't need their viewership. Some of the resellers have been gouging. There's a trend where big scammers buy up the rights to resell at ridiculous margins.But how would they pay for the rights? Same story for R350 you can pick either you get top class rugby, maybe F1, maybe soccer, maybe tennis. Remember they have to pay for the rights, it's not free and they don't dictate the costs.
You could watch 4 live streams back in the day. Don't think there was catchup in those days.That is actually a good idea, but isn't it limited to streams for live?
You mean all broadcasters created the trend? Cause that's how it works, broadcasters buy the rights so they can say look I have the rights to this sport. That's how it's been for a very long time.
You could watch 4 live streams back in the day. Don't think there was catchup in those days.
And that is why the rights cost so much, cause the sporting bodies know they can charge it cause of that.Lots of clever people, who outbid their competition by needlessly large margins, because they needed to show they had bigger balls, than the competition.
If DSTV cannot sell enough of those exclusive rights they so gratuously buy, they they should let someone else get exclusive rights, and buy the rights, in the same way they sell rights to SABC, and similar.
No idea, never really tried it, I have these archaic boxes under my TV that allowed me to watch DSTV.You could watch 4 live streams back in the day. Don't think there was catchup in those days.