Muslim medical students boycotting lectures on evolution

What does Darwinism have to do with a medical degree?
Are you sick?
Yes
Then die... you're weak and haven't evolved beyond the flu.

....Seems like contradicting concepts.
 
What does Darwinism have to do with a medical degree?
Are you sick?
Yes
Then die... you're weak and haven't evolved beyond the flu.

....Seems like contradicting concepts.

It would help if you actually read the thread. This is all answered.
 
Seems like a long read about something that's only mildly interesting... got other stuff to do.
Scrap that question then :D
Basically a couple of examples of evolutionary theory a doctor needs to know were presented. Like dealing with the HIV virus and its hectic evolution (this is why HIV needs to be treated with a cocktail of antiretrovirals) and being careful not to create super-resistant strains of bacteria by incorrectly applying antibiotics.
 
falcon786 said:
All those you mentioned(owl,eagle,octopus) use it for hunting their food which is important for their survival so sorry MR atheist but proving evolution doesn't disprove the existence of GOD.

Try again.

Who said it does? It's usually the faithful who claim that by disproving evolution, they prove God's existence. Bizarre logic.
 
Last edited:
[/quote=falcon768]All those you mentioned(owl,eagle,octopus) use it for hunting their food which is important for their survival so sorry MR atheist but proving evolution doesn't disprove the existence of GOD.

Try again./QUOTE]

Who said it does? It's usually the faithful who claim that by disproving evolution, they prove God's existence. Bizarre logic.

Look at the quote in my post that you quoted,maybe you missed the part where he used evolution to take a jab at religion.So there, some atheists clearly use evolution,now can you either stop them or stop asking us where anyone said it does.Let me re quote it for you to be sure...

would a creater seriously favor an ANIMAL over a human when it comes to the most important sense, eyesight?
 
Last edited:
Look at the quote in my post that you quoted,maybe you missed the part where he used evolution to take a jab at religion.So there, some atheists clearly use evolution,now can you either stop them or stop asking us where anyone said it does.Let me re quote it for you to be sure...

How is taking a jab at religion the same as claiming that evolution disproves God's existence? He basically just criticised the 'design'.
 
Are ants aware of the existence of humans when they walk around our buildings? The buildings were put there by an intelligent designer even though it is beyond the ability of ants to comprehend this. Perhaps it is beyond the ability of humans to comprehend that the universe was put here by an intelligent designer?


Douglas Adams explained it best:

261490322083846090_CNzPYLww_c.jpg
 
Why, of all the species on Earth (note that I capitalised the word Earth because it is a name; likewise the name of a theity should be capitalised because it is a name, even if you don't believe in that theity) which evolved over billions of years, did only homo sapiens evolve to possess our level of intelligence? This seems consistent with the idea that an intelligent designer decided to elevate humans above all other animals.
Why, of all species on Earth which evolved over billions of years, did only viruses evolve to possess their level of immune system evasion and rapid mutation rates? This seems consistent with the idea that an intelligent designer decided to elevate viruses above all other animals.

This is a silly argument dude. You are always going to find animals that do certain things better than other animals. We aren't superior, we're just different.

Intelligent design is not science. It has no real answer. You can go on pointlessly fapping about it forever or you can start dealing with what we have evidence for. Your choice.
 
How is taking a jab at religion the same as claiming that evolution disproves God's existence? He basically just criticised the 'design'.

No he is questioning the fact that anything was in fact created,that much is obvious.So you of by a long shot.
He was trying to get a point across by planting a seed question which is rhetoric,its an old debating tactic.
 
Why, of all species on Earth which evolved over billions of years, did only viruses evolve to possess their level of immune system evasion and rapid mutation rates? This seems consistent with the idea that an intelligent designer decided to elevate viruses above all other animals.

This is a silly argument dude. You are always going to find animals that do certain things better than other animals. We aren't superior, we're just different.

Intelligent design is not science. It has no real answer. You can go on pointlessly fapping about it forever or you can start dealing with what we have evidence for. Your choice.

And science while important cant explain everything yet,so maybe there is scientific evidence of an intelligent designer but we letting it pass right before our eyes.
 
I've read that the processing of sight takes up much brain activity and volume. So an intelligent designer may have reasoned that since humans would not have to hunt like animals for their food, this valuable brain space could rather be used for developing human intellect.

An intelligent designer may also have reasoned that humans don't need a layer of fat to protect their shins since they would not be living in the wild. A protective layer of fat would confer a survival advantage, so why didn't humans evolve over billions of years to have something as simple as a layer of fat to protect their shins, yet they evolved to have eyes and complex intellect?

Why, of all the species on Earth (note that I capitalised the word Earth because it is a name; likewise the name of a theity should be capitalised because it is a name, even if you don't believe in that theity) which evolved over billions of years, did only homo sapiens evolve to possess our level of intelligence? This seems consistent with the idea that an intelligent designer decided to elevate humans above all other animals.

Are ants aware of the existence of humans when they walk around our buildings? The buildings were put there by an intelligent designer even though it is beyond the ability of ants to comprehend this. Perhaps it is beyond the ability of humans to comprehend that the universe was put here by an intelligent designer?

Very possible,anyone dismissing this is clearly not open to new ideas.....its called thinking out of the box and in our case science may yet prove to be our box.
 
No, sounds like a religion trying desperately to fit the world into it's own box.

No again thinking everything can be explained by science is thinking in the box since our science isnt all encompassing yet,sometime theories are formulated before they are fully understood,we dont know everything yet.

Science is the most open minded method of investigating truth that we currently have at our disposal.

Currently yes,thats not to say that we wont find new scientific methods of looking at the world,its pandoras box really so we need to be open to ideas even magic if we are to be true scientists then nothing is impossible.
 
Currently yes,thats not to say that we wont find new scientific methods of looking at the world,its pandoras box really so we need to be open to ideas even magic if we are to be true scientists then nothing is impossible.

Science is not open or closed to anything.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X