Incorrect. On most cruisers the rear disc is either the same, or almost the same size as the front discs. So hardly "little". For example a V-Rod has 300mm discs front & rear, compared to say an R1, which has 320mm front & 220mm rear discs. Cruisers carry much more weight on the rear wheel than sport bikes, so the rear brake can and does play a larger role in braking. Obviously front brake must still be used, but instead of say 80-90 front & 10-20 rear it is more in the region of 70 front & 30 rear. Assuming one knows how to brake effectively of course. Stamping on the pedal will lock any rear wheel up!
On the V-Rod specifically you are somewhat correct in that it runs a 300mm disc both front and rear. However the front has two discs with 4 pistons and the rear only one disc with 2 pistons furthering my point that the physics remain the same.
I already illustrated you can get more rear braking out of a cruiser due to it's weight, so you are basically just underlining my point.
It's there for aesthetics and cost saving more than anything else. Maybe a little bit for cooling. It also plays into the underlying weight of the bike needing more to get the same efficacy.
Doesn't really support riding any differently because it's a cruiser. The physics still remain the exact same, the variables just change slightly.
If anything the differences in sizes etc should amount to you riding exactly the same as any other bike because you don't need to adjust for it...the bike has already been adjusted for it.
Many other cruisers run a single or double front 300mm with a single 180mm at the back or even drums in the not too distant past, the same ratio as most other bikes really.
My brakes (and levers) are set up correctly and in 100% working condition. Nothing wrong with them. Practice is what avoids grabbing a handful in panic situations. Not the number of fingers used!
Certainly correct, but it's harder to teach a newbie that way.
The risk is higher to grab more brakes when using all fingers by default.
You've just stated one of the biggest fallacies in motorcycling!
Rear brake is also for stopping. Numerous tests have been done showing the difference between using just front brake or front & rear. Front & rear used simultaneously is better every time.
No fallacy stated at all, just taken out of context.
I was never in the "front brakes only" camp and didn't state that anywhere. I fully agree in using a combination of both.
The response was related to people pushing the rear brake as the primary or even only source of braking which is completely wrong as it messes with the weight of the bike. Which is fully in agreement with your 80/20 and 70/30 split which I even mentioned myself earlier.
Sure taking that post in singularity seems easy to take it like that, but that's taken outside of context and not following the rest of my posts on the topic.
Believe it or not we are in the same camp here, so relax.