hawker
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2006
- Messages
- 11,461
I can't believe people are still making excuses for the useless Torres.
Why? He was phenomenal at Liverpool:
[video=youtube;pobbwioAIO8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pobbwioAIO8[/video]
I can't believe people are still making excuses for the useless Torres.
Why? He was phenomenal at Liverpool:
Then his knees got shot, he lost all his pace and he lost all his confidence. Torres was useless for us and it was not the system. Another example 33 year old Eot'o scored 9 in 21 for us while Torres scored 5 in 28. Tores was sh*t for us and it was all on him.
Biggest nonsense I've heard! Maybe in the beginning the system wasn't for him but we did so much for Torres. We bought a fantastic creative player in Hazard and Mata. We bought Oscar as well and yet he still didn't perform. For 2 seasons he was our main striker with Ba hardly ever getting a shout and a player like Sturridge being forced to leave because of it.
Tell me have you ever seen the runs Costa does Torres do? Fact of the matter is Torres was rubbish and it has nothing to do with our system. We literally built a team around him and he did fckall with it.
His problems weren't physical. His problems were in his head. Look at the statements from Inzaghi on his medical.
Maverick i would say you just havent had a very good striker since Drogba left and thats why nobody got over 20 goals. Costa will get more than 20 goals if he stays fit no doubt.
A big part of it was physical, he lost some pace due to his shot knees. This is widely known, he had constant knee and hamstring injuries at Liverpool that affected him everyone knows that.
Creative players is one thing. Fitting them into a system that was adequate is another.
Despite having all those options over the past few years- why have NONE of our strikers had more than 20 goals other than Torres since he was transferred? Why have all our strikers been piss-poor in comparison to our rivals? Simple- we have not had a system built around or to specifically suit any one striker, least of all Torres.
The team has gone through a number of coaches over the years, there has been no stability. So it's folly to suggest that the team was built around Torres when only now, do we have a deep-lying playmaker of actual quality, and a proper defensive midfielder.
I have, many times, without him being picked out. We never built a team around Torres, ever. He went from a spearhead to a battering ram, then was shunted out. He isn't the same player he was at Liverpool for a reason.
Perhaps, but that is why Torres was bought.
Yes, that doesn't mean that they were perpetual problems. His fitness has not been the issue for a while now, his confidence has been. Some of his misses have been criminal.
When he is confident, he is still pretty deadly- ask City last season.
Either way- I hope that he does well in Milan. The irony of us loaning our record fee striker to the club that we initially set the record with, is not lost on me.
You can be the pinnacle of health and still be a sh*t player.
So few hours left of the transfer will Chelsea buy/loan another player?
Is there a need?
I think looking at the other big teams Chelsea has spent the best.Feruz gone to OFI Crete.
Blackman gone to Middlesborough.
Overall, I'm very happy with our activity this window- reasoned, purposeful and most of all, very low net spending compared to the changes we have made.