Sign up with GoogleAus won't easily drop a team, they have no domestic competition. Also do you think that SA, Aus and NZ are each in the position to provide the same number of teams each?
-
Ask a question and get free supportUnlock new privileges and see hidden discussionsWin prizes and earn reputation
-
Question of the day ~ How often do you braai?
-
Afristay giveaway.Win a 2-night stay for two people at an establishment of your choice with R1,000 in spending money. Enter here.
Official Super Rugby Thread 2013
- Thread starter Devill
- Start date
- Status
Aus won't easily drop a team, they have no domestic competition. Also do you think that SA, Aus and NZ are each in the position to provide the same number of teams each?
sand_man
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2005
- Messages
- 35,845
NZ and SA have thriving domestic competitions that are suffering at the hands of super rugby. The main beneficiaries are Australia.
4 teams from each nation seems fair and prevents the some what diluted mess with we have now. NZ have the depth to send 5 competitive teams but no other nation does with OZ really only managing 3 competitive sides currently. Between the western force and Melbourne reds they could field a competent 4th team.
SA has consistently provided the team competing for last place so we too would benefit from a 4 side approach that being the bulls/lions, Stormers/kings, sharks and cheetahs/griquas.
Mephisto_Helix
Resident Postwhore
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2008
- Messages
- 29,723
Well, at least the Bullies are showing that the last couple weeks of their shyte playing was no fluke ....... prepare for mourning in Pta
Vrotappel
Bulls fan
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 25,982
They need to catch a wake-up during the break, or it's all lost.
I suspect a Stormers supporter.
Yip agree.
OGroteKoning
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2011
- Messages
- 10,741
- Status