Ongoing Palestinian terror attacks against Israel.

What about staunch action against Settlers who murder and burn Palestinians in their homes.

Destroy the homes of Settlers who murder Palestinians , shoot to kill order for Settlers attacking Palestinians.

Simple. Attack Israelis and get what you deserve. No questions required.
 
They can't do **** about this. In the past, Israel has been more or less been able to contain the violence because at the heart of it was always an organised resistance movement. But what you see today is like a hydra, cut off one head and it grows two more. There's simply nothing that the IDF or Israel can do to stop this without removing the settlers from the West Bank or committing genocide.

We will see. ;)
 
Then that's what they may have to do? Fsck it, the world hates Israel anyway right? May as well take these bastards out.
:erm:

Or they could just GET OUT OF THE WEST BANK, WHERE THEY HAVE NO BUSINESS BEING IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Just a thought.
 
:erm:

Or they could just GET OUT OF THE WEST BANK, WHERE THEY HAVE NO BUSINESS BEING IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Just a thought.

[video=youtube;v9n_8yvX0Gk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9n_8yvX0Gk[/video]

They lost this land when they attacked the Jews, so please stop freaking crying about it
Forgetting that 3000 years ago it was Jewish land
If Israel give up the west bank there will be no more Israel as the Arabs will see this as an invitation to attack again.

Watch all 4 videos, as I have always said this is not and never was about land it is about religion.
 
Last edited:
In-between all the off topic banter an update on the latest palestinian attack today:

Soldier murdered in Be'er Sheva bus terminal shooting attack

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4712997,00.html

11 people wounded in shooting and stabbing attack after terrorist grabbed M-16 rifle from soldier; terrorist killed, Eritrean man thought to be a second terrorist critically wounded.



A terrorist, who shot a soldier and snatched his M-16 rifle from him, opened fire at Be'er Sheva's central bus terminal on Sunday evening, murdering the soldier and wounding 11 others, several of them members of Israel's security forces.



Five people were seriously wounded - two of them very seriously, four others were in moderate condition and the rest in light condition. Seven others were suffering from shock. All wounded were taken to the Soroka Medical Center in Be'er Sheva.

The terrorist arrived at the bus terminal armed with a knife, a gun and ammunition, and started attacking passersby. He tried to stab a woman, who hit him with pepper spray, and then shot a soldier and snatched his M-16 rifle, shooting in all directions.

Security forces who were already at the station on their way home or to their bases opened fire at the terrorist, who escaped out of the bus terminal, where he was shot down and killed after a gun fight with security forces who arrived at the scene.
 
In-between all the off topic banter an update on the latest palestinian attack today:

Soldier murdered in Be'er Sheva bus terminal shooting attack

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4712997,00.html

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=061_1445187990

Same event? The number keeps changing, even in your link.

EDIT: To appease those who want to troll. No, I do not think that this is acceptable but I don't feel it necessary to add "savages" to everything I post.
 
They lost this land when they attacked the Jews
And yet there's still people on the land. So explain, please, what you think should be done with the millions of people still living on that land. How can people lose land they're still living on? Are you favouring ethnic cleansing?

so please stop freaking crying about it
Lol. I'm not crying about anything. Just pointing out the obvious as to why genocide isn't a moral imperative. It seems that you disagree, though.

Forgetting that 3000 years ago it was Jewish land
None of the people that were alive 3 000 years ago are alive today. And by that standard, get ready to give your land to the ANC, since by your standards they're entitled to it.

If Israel give up the west bank there will be no more Israel as the Arabs will see this as an invitation to attack again.
:rolleyes:

Suuuuure.

Israel cannot hold onto the West Bank without granting citizenship to everyone living in the territory. So either Israel gives up that land, or they give up their claim to being a democratic state, or they give up their Jewish character. They'll have to give up one of the three sooner or later.

Watch all 4 videos, as I have always said this is not and never was about land it is about religion.
Yeah, because we can trust the Israelis to speak on behalf of the Palestinians. :rolleyes:

P.S. Can you explain how Sephardic Jews have been living in the region for millenia in peace with their Arab neighbours if the hatred is indeed based in religion as you claim?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Palestine
 
P.S. Can you explain how Sephardic Jews have been living in the region for millenia in peace with their Arab neighbours if the hatred is indeed based in religion as you claim?
Not relevant to the current ongoing attacks and it is nonsense that the arabs were living in peace with the Jews, that is only if you dont count the various pogroms and rapes against the Jewish inhabitants - this has been shown in other threads and isn't relevant to the current ongoing stabbing and shooting attacks against Israelis.
 
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=061_1445187990

Same event? The number keeps changing, even in your link.

EDIT: To appease those who want to troll. No, I do not think that this is acceptable but I don't feel it necessary to add "savages" to everything I post.

causality numbers are generally not accurate during breaking news. At the moment it looks like one Israeli dead, 11 injured and a total of 35 taken to hospital including shock victims etc
 
Last edited:
Not relevant to the current ongoing attacks and it is nonsense that the arabs were living in peace with the Jews, that is only if you dont count the various pogroms and rapes against the Jewish inhabitants - this has been shown in other threads and isn't relevant to the current ongoing stabbing and shooting attacks against Israelis.
Source please.
 
Well documented the various arab pogroms 1929, 1920, 1886, 1834 and others, google will help you out.

And then go back and read post #664
All after 1800 which was when the European settlers first started moving into the region due to Theodore Herzl's political activism.

Edit: And refuting spurious claims about the motivations for the current conflict is on topic.
 
All after 1800 which was when the European settlers first started moving into the region due to Theodore Herzl's political activism.

Edit: And refuting spurious claims about the motivations for the current conflict is on topic.

You claimed Arabs were peaceful and living in harmony with Jews, so when exactly - definitely not in the 1900's, now you say also not in the 1800's which really, you blame on Hertzel, really, you have to try a bit harder to excuse the murders and rapes of Jews in 1834 on Hertzel..........he was only born in 1860.

Then we have the riots in 1721 so we discard the 1700 as but wait we had the pogroms in the 1500 so thats also out...so would you mind exactly pinpointing where in history did the arabs not terrorize the jewish population - when exactly in time is this so called peaceful co-existence that you spoke about?

And how any of this is relevant to the current daily terror attacks against Israelis??:confused:
 
Last edited:
You claimed Arabs were peaceful and living in harmony with Jews, so when exactly - definitely not in the 1900's, now you say also not in the 1800's which really, you blame on Hertzel, really, you have to try a bit harder to excuse the murders and rapes of Jews in 1834 on Hertzel..........he was only born in 1860.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1834_looting_of_Safed
Druze are not Muslims. And it grew out of a general riot and as we all know riots and disasters tend to cause lawlessness. Just like the looting that followed after Hurricane Katrina or the looting in the UK a few years back. This violence cannot reasonably be said to have been due to religious differences, and even claiming it was due to sectarian differences is a stretch.

Then we have the riots in 1721 so we discard the 1700 as but wait we had the pogroms in the 1500 so thats also out...so would you mind exactly pinpointing where in history did the arabs not terrorize the jewish population - when exactly in time is this so called peaceful co-existence that you spoke about?
Do we? I can't find any sources for your claims, so perhaps you want to be more specific.

And how any of this is relevant to the current daily terror attacks against Israelis??:confused:
Ask marine1. He's the one claiming that these attacks are solely due to religious differences.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X