Online piracy is driven by greed

so true. tell that to the execs behind their mahogany desks. The only business model left for music is all-you-can-eat streaming subscriptions. even buying MP3's is sooo last season.
 
Trying to translate this model of charging for every physical incarnation to the digital world is “driving us to illegality by being greedy,” Borenstein said.

People should rebel against it, he concluded.

I agree with his thoughts - media companies are stuck fighting against technological progress to preserve an outdated business model. However, I'd be interested in hearing what ideas he has for rebelling against them, short of boycotting them.
 
His model sounds like a private torrent sites model.

Very true though.
 
U.S. To Introduce Draconian Anti-Piracy Censorship Bill

Meanwhile, in America....

U.S. To Introduce Draconian Anti-Piracy Censorship Bill

The U.S. Government is determined to put an end to online piracy. In an attempt to give copyright holders and the authorities all the tools required to disable access to so-called rogue sites, lawmakers will soon introduce the PROTECT IP Act. Through domain seizures, ISP blockades, search engine censorship, and cutting funding of allegedly copyright infringing websites, the bill takes Internet censorship to the next level.

Internet censorship is a hot topic this year.

During the past 12 months the U.S. Government seized more than 100 domain names it claimed were promoting copyright infringement. But this was just the beginning. The domain seizures pale in comparison to a bill that’s about to be introduced by U.S. lawmakers.

Dubbed the PROTECT IP Act, the bill will introduce a wide-scale of censorship tools authorities and copyright holders can use to quash websites they claim are facilitating copyright infringement. It is basically a revamped and worsened version of the controversial COICA proposal which had to be resubmitted after its enaction failed last year.

The summary of the bill begins with a recital of the now-standard industry claims about the financial harm caused by copyright infringement. Claims that interestingly enough were put in doubt by the U.S. Government last year, but are still used to push anti-piracy legislation through globally.

“Copyright infringement and the sale of counterfeit goods are reported to cost American creators and producers billions of dollars and to result in hundreds of thousands in lost jobs annually. This pervasive problem has assumed an especially threatening form on the Internet,” the bill document reads.

It is further explained that the PROTECT IP Act is needed as an extension of the already controversial domain seizures. As reported previously, it is now relatively easy for a seized website to continue operating under a new non-US based domain name. With the new bill, however, the authorities and copyright holders have a broader scale of tools they can use.

“The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act (“PROTECT IP Act”) authorizes the Justice Department to file a civil action against the registrant or owner of a domain name that accesses a foreign Internet site, or the foreign-registered domain name itself, and to seek a preliminary order from the court that the site is dedicated to infringing activities,” the document continues.

In case a domain is not registered or controlled by a U.S. company, the authorities can also order search engines to remove the website from its search results, order ISPs to block the website, and order ad-networks and payment processors to stop providing services to the website in question.

“If the court issues an order against the registrant, owner, or domain name, resulting from the DOJ-initiated suit, the Attorney General is authorized to serve that order on specified U.S. based third-parties, including Internet service providers, payment processors, online advertising network providers, and search engines. These third parties would then be required to take appropriate action to either prevent access to the Internet site, or cease doing business with the Internet site.”

Although the above is already quite far-reaching, the bill also allows for private copyright holders to use some of the same tools as the Government. Without due process, copyright holders can obtain a court order to prevent payment providers and ad-networks from doing business with sites that allegedly facilitate copyright infringement. Unlike the DOJ, copyright holders can not obtain orders to block sites through ISPs or search engines.

The summary of the bill does not go into the constitutional issues that arise with several of the measures. However, it ensures that the legislation is in the best interest of the public by protecting people from any website that “endangers the public health.” The only protection for accused websites is that they can “petition the court to suspend or vacate the order,” but lessons from the previous domain seizures show that this process can take up several months.

The PROTECT IP Act is expected to be officially introduced in the coming weeks, and more details will be released at the time. Sources close to the U.S Government say the bill has already gathered a lot of support among legislators, which is a worrying message for the relatively free-Internet as its known today.

http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-to-intr...tm_campaign=Feed:+Torrentfreak+(Torrentfreak)
 
I do not copy computer software and I buy most of the music I like, because I feel guilty if I do copy these content without giving the people(I know record labels rip of artist, thats a other problem) the money they deserve(Note I'm a heavy user of Free Open Source Software).

But with shock and horror I realized a month ago I do not have any problem in copying TV Series and that bothered me. The only reason I can think why I have not a problem with that is because there is no better alternative in South Africa? I'm aware of Netflix but I feel streaming content from the USA over my ADSL line will just be frustrating.

Also I like his idea of content providers giving away everything for free and tracking how users use it and pay for it. But I can already see fears of Big Brother, etc.
 
I'm aware of Netflix but I feel streaming content from the USA over my ADSL line will just be frustrating.

Surprise, surprise, Netflix would not provide you with anything to watch anyway, since you do not reside in the USA. :p
 
Refreshing article with some new suggestions. Very nice. BSA can take a lot from this article, but they won't.
 
U.S. To Introduce Draconian Anti-Piracy Censorship Bill
Meanwhile, in America....
This might be a good thing, these ****heads must explain to the us government why their profits haven't risen after this bill comes into force. This can be used as a benchmark to show once and for all that they don't loose nearly as much as they try and make out.
 

This may sound alarming, but in reality it is great news.
What will happen when the US starts seizing domain names? People will stop registering domain names with US registrars and that is a Good Thing!

What will happen if the US decides to try and seize internationally registered domain names?
We can start getting away from DNS that is controlled by a handful of people and start using a distributed internet naming system. This is a Very Good Thing.

What will happen if the US starts to force search engines to sensor their listings?
This creates the oppertunity for rival search engines to emerge overseas and bring well needed competition. This is a Good Thing.

What will happen if the US starts to disconnect IPs connected to torrents?
US people will start to buy VPN connections overseas. Not such a good thing, but this will hurt the US economy a lot more than simply letting file sharers be.

Because the internet is a global phenomenon, the moment the US starts to regulate their little portion of it they start to become a very weak and untrusted player in the internet arena, and ensuring no country has too much control over the internet is an Extremely Good Thing.

"The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." -- John Gilmore
 
I would like to see a system where you pay as much as you think a TV episode / movie / song is worth. Iow if you like it a lot you pay more. If you think a song is mediocre or a singing Greys Anatomy episode sucked you pay nothing or less. This would then serve as a rating system for content providers which would enable them to know what people are willing to pay for and what not.
 
I agree with his thoughts - media companies are stuck fighting against technological progress to preserve an outdated business model. However, I'd be interested in hearing what ideas he has for rebelling against them, short of boycotting them.
That and yeah very good article.
Also:
This might be a good thing, these ****heads must explain to the us government why their profits haven't risen after this bill comes into force. This can be used as a benchmark to show once and for all that they don't loose nearly as much as they try and make out.

Did you read the article on sms messages yesterday? http://mybroadband.co.za/news/insight/20156-SMS-the-most-expensive-yet-also-the-most-used-data-application.html
They make an argument about changes in prices not making much difference to the amount of money people will spend on sms's.
I strongly believe that this argument is applicable to Music/Movies etc. People can only spend a finite amount of their resources on media. I'm not denying that the music industry has lost some revenue from piracy but it would not make the billions of dollars that are sometimes claimed to be lost to piracy.
 
This may sound alarming, but in reality it is great news.
What will happen when the US starts seizing domain names? People will stop registering domain names with US registrars and that is a Good Thing!

What will happen if the US decides to try and seize internationally registered domain names?
We can start getting away from DNS that is controlled by a handful of people and start using a distributed internet naming system. This is a Very Good Thing.

What will happen if the US starts to force search engines to sensor their listings?
This creates the oppertunity for rival search engines to emerge overseas and bring well needed competition. This is a Good Thing.

What will happen if the US starts to disconnect IPs connected to torrents?
US people will start to buy VPN connections overseas. Not such a good thing, but this will hurt the US economy a lot more than simply letting file sharers be.

Because the internet is a global phenomenon, the moment the US starts to regulate their little portion of it they start to become a very weak and untrusted player in the internet arena, and ensuring no country has too much control over the internet is an Extremely Good Thing.

"The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." -- John Gilmore

I really like your view on it. Made me remember that there were some rouge dns providers a while back who were giving out their own domain names... You just needed to add their root servers to your browser or something similar.
 
B..ls..t

Ja right . . . This looks like some cooked up attempt to ease someone’s conscious. I am a big downloader myself but at least I am honest enough to admit what I am doing. The bottom line is that downloading something (anything) without paying therefore is tantamount to stealing. All these stupid arguments based on freedom of information and consumers being ripped off by greedy corporates are rubbish. Stealing is stealing no matter how you try and disguise it.
The thing is that the internet has made it really easy to safely steal digital content. I don’t think this will change any time soon either. That is the only reason why the content creators have been forced to look at other distribution models like the all-you-can-eat streaming subscriptions mentioned in a previous post. Do they want to change the way they distribute their material? No they don’t. Do they think they will make more money this way? No they don’t. They are simply doing it to counter the illegal downloading of their material. They simply hope that if they present the average content downloader with a relatively cheap and easy way to get the content legally, most of them will go for it to ease their consciousness.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X