aquarat
Active Member
I got an e-mail last night from Keoma Wright, CEO of OpenWeb, sent to all OpenWeb subscribers. It's included here (minus the signature, glimmer of hope and "Hi Friends" line).
I've highlighted some of the stuff I found interesting :
As for "not allowed to sell a first class service"... they can sell whatever they want to sell, you're the
for reselling the service and reselling it as "a good experience.". (those words are from your site by the way).
It gets better...
Seriously ? depoloyed ? Even the spell checker in my browser for this post is screaming at me about the spelling of that word.
.
I think that's probably been the most ridiculous communication I have ever received from any South African business.
Am I wrong ?
P.S. Bold text is great
.
I've highlighted some of the stuff I found interesting :
The first line is a great way to start an e-mail to your customers. Make it seem like you're one of them and throw in a some grammar and spelling mistakes while you're at it because hey, our customers won't notice because they can't speak English anyway.Today we have received alot of emails from many angry folks regarding the Seacom international outage. We understand. Everyone is frustrated.
"Seacom should be held accountable" ... um... cables break. Sure, Seacom has seen an exceptionally large number of breaks, but it has also brought cheap bandwidth to South Africa. I argue that cheap bandwidth is cheap for a reason - in this case because it carries higher risk of failure. ISPs buy data from Seacom (?)... so no data, no charge, therefore ISPs should be able to pass the saving on to their customers, unless of course, they're buying SAT3 data. ISPs need to offer services that have redundancy and services that don't have redundancy... it's like buying insurance. Even with redundancy, premium uncapped services in ZA are an eighth of the price they used to be. I know, I pay an eighth of what I used to and I still have decent international (in fact, I can't tell there's an issue on Seacom).Seacom should be held accountable for this. I am of the view that a carrier that do not have appropriate redundancy on their network should not be allowed to sell a so called 'first class service'.
*Rant Over*.
As for "not allowed to sell a first class service"... they can sell whatever they want to sell, you're the
It gets better...
A spelling or grammar mistake here and there on a forum is fine... but this is the CEO of an ISP...Backup links were depoloyed, however, as Murphy and his law has it, they too failed.
One would hope soEngineers are attending to the fault.
?!?! But you're the one who's offering those "cheap" services. You are not an end user, you are an ISP! You chose to switch to SEACOM and your customers followed. I would far rather have cheap but unreliable internet any day over Telkom's expensive 3GB cap. You're the one that hasn't adequately prepared.Internet in South Africa is worse off today with these cheap uncapped packages than they ever were before! At least in the past we had decent internet that hardly went down.
Now you're playing really ugly. Telkom isn't the best company on the block... but your woes have nothing to do with poor ol' Telkom. Are you calling yourself a First Tier ISP ? Are you blaming your lack of backups on Telkom ?Telkom should also wake up and drop the price of their IPConnect, as they more than any other company are to blame for this. If their IPConnect did not cost so much, First Tier ISP's would have more money to invest in redundancy measures.
Whew.*Second Rant Over*
I think that's probably been the most ridiculous communication I have ever received from any South African business.
Am I wrong ?
P.S. Bold text is great
Last edited: