SA Politics Thread Part 11: The GNU Normal

Status
Not open for further replies.
The whole point of the GNU is that you will not always agree on everything, the ANC and EFF will not always agree if the EFF is in the GNU, but the ANC know there is something they can get from them they can't get from the DA, it doesn't mean there is nothing the ANC can benefit from the DA.

There is no contradiction except the fact that the redress and transformation can never be stopped and the ANC will never be ashamed to publicly canvass like minded parties in that regard, same way there is nothing wrong for the DA to canvass other parties to influence the GNU in their desired direction, but we all know they don't have too many options compared to the ANC.
The ANC may not apologize for their redress policies. The reality however is that they've used those as vehicles to enrich each other at the expense of the our people they claim and pretend to serve. South Africa's economy has lagged way behind peers due to the ANC and their hypocritical ideologies.

In principle redress makes sense but like anything in the hands of the ANC they cynically use it for narrow ends. They are inflexible and take years to make an urgent decision. It is possible to have redress and grow the economy.. the ANC have decided that redress is the priority even as people grow poorer and the cost of living runs away.
 
  • DA leader John Steenhuisen, Freedom Front Plus’ Corné Mulder and Rise Mzansi’s Songezo Zibi are united in opposing an expansion of the GNU.
  • Ramaphosa hasn’t spoken to his biggest coalition partner since firing Andrew Whitfield in June, and promised meetings between leaders haven’t happened.
  • While the ANC reportedly wants to add ActionSA, Build One SA and the National Coloured Congress, these parties demand credible reform plans and funding commitments beyond mere statements of intent before they will consider joining.
Three parties in the government of national unity (GNU) say the ANC must first address shortcomings in the current government before expanding it with other parties.
President Cyril Ramaphosa said on Monday evening in his closing address at the ANC’s national executive committee meeting that more parties could be approached to join the GNU.

However, the DA, the Freedom Front Plus (FF+) and Rise Mzansi say Ramaphosa should rather focus on fulfilling promises to his current government.

DA leader John Steenhuisen, FF+ leader Corné Mulder and Rise Mzansi leader Songezo Zibi each point out that GNU party leaders do not meet regularly enough with each other. Moreover, the GNU’s dispute resolution committee, the Clearing House, has still not adopted terms of reference.



So far, this committee has only met about the controversial Basic Education Laws Amendment (Bela) Act last year. The committee, led by Deputy President Paul Mashatile, has not met, for example, about the deadlock in budget negotiations earlier this year, or about issues such as the Expropriation Act.
We still haven’t had our bosberaad between party leaders, or the bosberaad between Cabinet members that was promised last year.
John Steenhuisen
He added: “There is just no cooperation. The last time the president spoke to his biggest coalition partner was when he fired Andrew Whitfield [as deputy minister on 27 June]. Surely it can’t work like this.”
Mulder agrees with Steenhuisen: “Current members’ aspirations are not even being pursued, so why add more members?”

According to Mulder, the ANC will first have to get consensus from its coalition partners in terms of the statement of intent, which was signed by all GNU partners.

We [the FF+] will not be in consensus with that. The strategy [of the ANC] is clear. The ANC wants to stay in power at all costs and will even dilute its current partners’ support to get that support.
Corné Mulder
Steenhuisen points out that the statement of intent stipulates that sufficient consensus must exist among GNU members before new members can be invited to join.

Sufficient consensus only exists when parties that jointly represent 60% in the National Assembly – the ANC (39%) and the DA (21%) – agree on an issue.
“But there are already so many other urgent issues in the GNU that I don’t know how wise it is to try to involve other parties,” says Steenhuisen.
Zibi also believes the current GNU is “not a good environment to add new partners”.


Party leaders first need to form a more substantial agreement than what currently exists. Because the current agreement is not working well.
Songezo Zibi
“Currently, there are nine separate agreements: The parties that each signed the statement of intent with the ANC. But something more coherent than that is needed.”
Steenhuisen, Mulder and Zibi have confirmed that the ANC has not yet contacted them about its intention to expand the GNU.
DA sources say if the ANC wants to expand the GNU, they will also have to give up some of their own positions in Cabinet.
The DA holds proportionally 30.2% of the seats in the GNU. However, its six ministers hold only 18.8% of Cabinet posts.
In contrast, the ANC got 62.5% of Cabinet posts, although it holds only 55.2% of the seats in the GNU.
While the DA, FF+ and Rise Mzansi appear to be opposed to expanding the GNU, Patricia de Lille’s Good party says they do not see a problem with it.

“Given that the GNU is a government of national unity, it is self-evident that the ‘unity’ part would seek to encourage as many constituencies as possible to be represented in it,” says Brett Herron, secretary-general of Good.
The PAC is also open to new members.
“I think we have also stated previously that it would make sense if we were to have other smaller parties to form part of the GNU,” says Azania Tyhall, the PAC’s spokesperson.

The IFP, the Patriotic Alliance, the UDM and Al Jama-ah did not respond to enquiries.

City Press’ sister publication Rapport has learnt that the ANC reportedly wants to add Herman Mashaba’s ActionSA, Mmusi Maimane’s Build One SA (Bosa) and Fadiel Adams’ National Coloured Congress to the GNU.


ActionSA says they are open to negotiations with the GNU, despite the fact that they rejected an initial invitation.
However, the party adds that the GNU to date does not look like it will change South Africa’s fate.
“While we would not want to speculate on engagements that have not happened, should such an engagement transpire, ActionSA’s considerations will be based on whether our involvement will bring about the much-needed reforms in our country,” says Matthew George, ActionSA’s spokesperson.
Bosa says they will only join a government that is serious about reforms that will grow the economy, create jobs, fix education and fight crime.
“This requires more than the statement of intent; it demands credible funding plans and alignment with budget spending priorities,” says Roger Solomons, Bosa’s spokesperson.
 
The EFF might still vote with the DA and oppose something while in the GNU, like they did with VAT.

But it will still be good to have them in to guard against the DA holding the ANC ransom on stuff that has to do with transformation and redress, because that threat is always there with the DA.
The DA is going. They declared war on the ANC that commands twice as large a voter base as they do. 🤣

 
Well, ANC can't add anyone unilaterally, according to the statement of intent.

It needs to be unanimous. That's why VF+ opposing is a big deal.

But then again, it's not like the ANC cares about the statement of intent.

P.S. Keep your salivating for a doomsday coalition under control for now.
Statement of intent? 🤣

That did them a whole lot of good when the ANC added more parties, signed more laws the DA fumed over and more.

Story of the DA declaring war on the ANC coming out at 2p.m! 😁🍿

You were saying something about the coalition being under control? 🤣
 
We patiently await the news at 2p.m about the ANC seeing the DA as an enemy once again and not a "unity" partner while the loony BG enjoys their not so wonderful delusions. 🍿

Gayton to be sacked as Minister soon and the doomed marriage of the ANC and DA is coming to an end.

Lovely week, lovely weekend and lovely Sunday. 🙂
 
Someone has also dug some old posts from the erstwhile sushi king. From his sushi king days and saying some vile **** about women.
 
Statement of intent? 🤣

That did them a whole lot of good when the ANC added more parties
Yes, statement of intent. The document that is supposed to be the foundation of the GNU, that's why it's so chaotic, because ANC still has delusions of having 70% of the vote and ignores it...

But when DA left the Dialogue, that very same ANC started crying about the statement they've ignored...
You were saying something about the coalition being under control? 🤣
What? Lol, your reading comprehension is dogshite. I was talking about how you should control yourself over your lust for doomsday but ok...

All that money at WMC NMU wasted...
 

It gets better. I'm sure we can come up with a decoy for this...
  • The Government Pensions Administration Agency (GPAA) has agreed to pay more than R1 billion in a fictitious agreement to lease a building for its headquarters.
  • Shula Developers does not own the property - and has no access to the Brooklyn Office Park to which it is ostensibly moving the GPAA head office.
  • JSE-listed Attacq is the owner of the property and has no dealings with Shula or the pensions administrator.
  • For secure, anonymous communication with News24’s Investigations team, click here.

The Government Pensions Administration Agency (GPAA), which administers the pension assets of government employees, has agreed to pay just under R1 billion in what appears to be a fictitious agreement to lease a building for its headquarters in Pretoria for the next 10 years.

The contract is laden with serious irregularities and governance failures, including what could be criminal conduct, fraud and corruption on the part of GPAA’s executives and the winning bidder.

Shula Developers won the tender, even though it neither owns nor has access to the building. It was awarded the tender based on a letter in which it told GPAA that it had made an offer to acquire the Brooklyn Bridge Office Park building.

The GPAA was established in 2010 to provide administration services to the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), which manages about R3 trillion in civil servants’ and other parastatals’ pensions.

Without a board of directors, the GPAA’s chief executive, Kedibone Madiehe, reports to the minister of finance, currently Enoch Godongwana.

News24 can reveal the GPAA bid team awarded the contract to Shula without having gained access to inspect the building to determine its suitability for the contract.

Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has oversight responsibility for the GPAA

The lease is valid for nine years and 11 months from the occupation date, which is pencilled in for March 2026.


This means that, when the time comes, the GPAA will be liable to start paying rent on a lease to a building to which it has no access.

News24 has also reliably learnt that tens of millions of rand have already been paid to Shula and another entity to ready the building for occupation.

Despite the stated requirement to produce either proof of ownership or a signed and valid deed of sale agreement in a pending transaction when the tender was being adjudicated, Shula did not provide the GPAA with either.

Shula has two directors, Modulathoko Cornelius Kgaka and Lazarus Sikhwetha, who negotiated the deal.

Shula won the contract and beat three other bidders - the Public Investment Corporation, SKG Africa and Talis Property Investments - all of whom provided proof of ownership of the properties they offered for the deal.

Shula declined to answer direct questions about whether it owned the building at the time it submitted its bid or currently.

In a letter sent by law firm Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, Shula cited pending litigation as a reason for not answering our detailed questions, only saying it had complied with the tender requirements when it submitted its bid.

Cliffe Dekker warned News24 against publishing “assumptions and allegations” that are not grounded in facts and to await the outcome of the litigation in which one of the losing bidders approached the court.

When approached for comment on the transaction, the GPAA declined to answer questions about who among its officials had access to inspect the property during the bidding process. It cited “internal processes” that were investigating the transaction.

“If the final report [from the processes] points to irregularities, we will follow due process as per National Treasury guidelines,” said its spokesperson, Mack Lewele.

The Brooklyn Bridge Office Park is owned by Attacq, a JSE-listed real estate developer. It is currently tenanted by Old Mutual, the SA Revenue Service, and Regus, which provides office space on short-term leases.


In a brief response to News24’s enquiry, Attacq confirmed it owned the building and declined to answer whether it had ever entered into a sale agreement with Shula.

“As the remaining questions relate to matters that do not involve Attacq, we are not in a position to comment further,” said Liz Ferreira of public relations firm Instinctiff, on behalf of Attacq.

Pressed for more conclusive comment, Ferreira added: “The company is not transferring ownership or handing over the property to Shula Developers or the GPAA.”

Attacq has valid lease agreements on the property.

According to a record of the tender award, which ran from June to October 2024, Shula Developers emerged as the only bidder who met the requirements of the second phase of the tender process.

This phase required the property to meet the minimum B grading for office space, have a gross leasable area of at least 22 506 square metres, and have 710 parking bays on site.

The mandatory requirements of the phase read:


[The] bidder must be the owner of the property leased. Then, if the bidder has a power of attorney, a certified copy of the document must be submitted with the bid.

“A signed deed of sale agreement will be considered for property sold to one entity to the other [sic],” read the specifications before adding the agreement must be signed by both the buyer and the seller.

The other requirements were that the proposed property be within 10km of the current GPPA head office on 34 Hamilton Street in Pretoria and at least 500m away from a public transport station, which could be a taxi rank, bus station, or train station.

Any bidder who did not meet the requirements of this second phase would be disqualified from the process.

Mongezi Mngqibisa, the chief director for special military and other pensions, chaired both the bid specification and bid evaluation committees.
 
Part 2:
The committees also comprised the same five individuals as members who awarded the tender.

Eric Morudu was acting chief director for client relationship management; Leon Nieuwoudt, the chief director for strategic support services; the director for the call centre, Motlalepule Dipholo; and Colane Benside, the director for facilities and security management, completed the panels.




Leon Nieuwoudt was one of five committee members who awarded tender.

All committee members awarded Shula 91 points out of the maximum 100 on offer.

Shula scored the most points on the section of requirements titled “relevant experience,” which required the bidders to submit reference letters or testimonials from previous clients. Submitting no reference entitled the bidder to zero points, while a maximum of 25 points would be awarded for more than eight reference letters.

A bidder with more than five years of practical experience in facilities management or property development would receive a maximum of 15 points. The bidder would need to provide the entity’s organisational structure, a staff organogram, and audited financial statements.

The scores of the other bidders are not recorded in the memorandum requesting the CEO to approve the appointment.

The bid committees recorded Shula as the only successful competitor without explaining how the other bidders failed in this phase.

This cleared the way for it to proceed with negotiating the price of the tender without any competition.

The rental price was fixed at an average of R264.99 per square metre, and Shula was awarded 95 points for this.

By this stage, there was no competition as all the bidders had been disqualified at the stage where they had to produce proof of ownership of the properties, which they did.

GPAA’s chief executive, Kedibone Madiehe, approved the recommendation on 28 August.

“The irregularities in question were brought to the minister’s attention by the chairperson of the audit committee, who also formally requested that an investigation be conducted,” said Godongwana’s spokesperson, Mfuneko Toyana.

“Based on this recommendation, Minister Godongwana has instructed the Specialised Investigation Services, operating under the Office of the Accountant General, to undertake a comprehensive investigation into these matters.”

Toyana added it would be premature for Godongwana to provide detailed comment as the investigation was in progress.
 
Imagine if all the trillions stolen over the years weren't... And they were actually used to uplift communities and build infrastructure.

SA would be way better off than it is atm...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X