SA Politics Thread Part 11: The GNU Normal

Status
Not open for further replies.

Former Pres. Thabo Mbeki and Pres. Cyril Ramaphosa's national dialogue is stillborn, writes Dawie Boonzaaier.

What was supposed to be an inclusive process to discuss critical challenges for the country and help forge a common vision for the government of national unity (GNU) has lost credibility before a single conversation has taken place.

It can hardly be called a “national” dialogue if the country's second largest party, and the second largest coalition partner in the GNU, is not participating in it.

Nor if major unions label it an “elite-driven damage control move by an ANC that has failed miserably in governing the country and is now trying to regain its legitimacy”.

The Afrikaner Leaders Network (ALN) had already raised the alarm in August last year about the lack of transparency in the planning of the dialogue.

This despite the fact that Mbeki, in his opening speech to the dialogue in April last year, referred precisely to the ALN's Afrikaner Declaration that was to be discussed in the dialogue.

The Afrikaner Declaration, which was launched in April last year, invited the government to conclude a cultural pact with Afrikaners. This invitation was probably lost in the mail, because the attempts earlier this year to repair the relationship between the ALN and the ANC also came to nothing.

One cannot blame John Steenhuisen and the DA for their decision to boycott the dialogue.

Ramaphosa's unilateral dismissal of the DA's Andrew Whitfield may have been for a valid reason, but it was actually just the last straw that broke the camel's back.

Since the formation of the RNE in June last year, the ANC has not seemed to want to share power with its partners for a single day. Partners without whom they would not be able to take the main seats at the dinner tables in Tuynhuys again.

First the DA was brought in with too few cabinet posts, then Ramaphosa unilaterally wanted to promulgate the controversial Basic Education Laws Amendment Act (Bela), the Expropriation Act was quietly signed behind the backs of RNE partners, and there was a decision, without consultation, to increase VAT.

These are just a few examples.

The ANC also refuses to review its one-eyed foreign policy and prefers to continue to quietly collude with despotic leaders while they want to present a semblance of neutrality. A semblance so fragile that it will shatter to pieces at the lightest touch.

Therefore, it is the DA's full right to withdraw from the national dialogue. You can't make a living with someone who walks in on you at every turn.

In response to an open letter from Mbeki on Friday, Steenhuisen hit the nail on the head: The ANC does not really want to have an inclusive dialogue; it wants to win back lost respect among voters by pretending that they care.

Steenhuisen points out that the DA has been asking for insight into the dialogue since July last year, but that the party has been ignored to this day. The FF Plus has also complained about it. Rapport has reported on it many times.

"In short, the idea of the national dialogue has been planned for some time between yourself and the ANC, with no similar courtesy given to any other political party in the RNE. This confirms that the national dialogue is a creature of the ANC that was forced on the public with the dishonest claim that it is an inclusive process," says Steenhuisen's letter to Mbeki.

In his letter, Steenhuisen also takes issue with the estimated R700 million that the dialogue is believed to cost our taxpayers.

“You write that there is an agreement that the Ministry of Finance will provide the necessary funds to hold the national dialogue,” Steenhuisen writes to Mbeki.

“This careless attitude towards public money that assumes that the government will write a blank cheque for another series of talks is precisely why the country finds itself in a difficult financial position.”

The ANC has a tendency to misuse public money. As Steenhuisen reminds Mbeki: The commission against state capture has cost taxpayers more than a billion rand, and those reports are gathering dust in an outer room of the Union Buildings.

But instead of heeding all the criticism and warnings, Ramaphosa and Mbeki will probably try to push through with their exclusive dialogue.

The ANC and its yes-bro partners like the PA, Good and UDM are now firing salvo after salvo at the DA, making hollow accusations of arrogance, racism and that the DA is supposedly opposed to transformation. But it will take more than that to save the credibility of the national dialogue.

In a country where the black unemployment rate has risen from 34% to 44% since 2008, it may be the ANC that is opposed to transformation.
If the DA and even the unions oppose this... How would this work? It'll just be a monologue of ANC, ANC-linked foundations and some useful idiots like UDM and GOOD.
 


If the DA and even the unions oppose this... How would this work? It'll just be a monologue of ANC, ANC-linked foundations and some useful idiots like UDM and GOOD.
South Africans aren't asking much of the ANC. It's actually quite simple: Govern with your partners.

Because heaven knows, they can't go it alone anymore.
Conclusion to the article. Couldn't fit it in.
 

  • The ActionSA leader accuses mayor Dada Morero of failing to treat his party and other coalition partners with respect.
  • Herman Mashaba says the party was never in a coalition with the ANC and only supported it on an issue-by-issue basis.
  • He says the ANC’s governance failures and lack of consultation led to the breakdown and ultimately to the removal of ActionSA’s speaker.
The fallout between ActionSA and the ANC in Johannesburg has reached a point of no return.

ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba said his party had ended its working relationship with the ANC in the metro following the removal of Nobuhle Mthembu as speaker of the council.

Mthembu, an ActionSA councillor, was ousted in a motion supported by the ANC, the EFF and the DA last week – a move Mashaba described as the ANC’s response to ActionSA’s refusal to vote for the ANC’s budget.

In an interview with City Press this week, Mashaba said the relationship between the two parties had been deteriorating for months and was now “completely over”.


“We were never coalition partners,” Mashaba said.

We always made it clear; we were voting with them on an issue-by-issue basis. But now, the only relationship the ANC and ActionSA have in Johannesburg is that we sit in the same council chamber. That’s it.
Herman Mashaba

A slow breakdown over governance and budgets​

Mashaba explained that ActionSA had initially agreed to vote with the ANC on certain matters after the ANC pleaded for the party’s support to cushion their political vulnerability.

“They said they wanted to ‘cushion their vulnerability’ in the event they had issues, especially after their problems with the EFF in Ekurhuleni,” Mashaba said.

He said the relationship began to show cracks when the ANC passed a controversial electricity surcharge of R230 without proper consultation. Though the ANC allegedly promised to reconsider the surcharge in the February adjustment budget, ActionSA was not consulted – and the surcharge remained in place.


“Two days before council, that’s the only time we saw the adjustment budget,” Mashaba said.

My team had been asking to see it for weeks. We were not consulted. Not on the surcharge, not on anything else.
Herman Mashaba
He accused mayor Dada Morero of failing to treat ActionSA and other coalition partners – including the EFF, IFP and Patriotic Alliance – with respect.

“Even the new budget; we were never consulted. Dada Morero just decided to come out and present it,” he said.

“We’ve made it clear to the ANC provincial leadership that we will not vote for a budget we did not see or contribute to.”

Mashaba added that he had personally warned ANC provincial leaders that if the matter was not resolved by May, ActionSA would vote against the budget.

“I gave them until the end of May to fix this, and when they didn’t, we told them: ‘If you remove our speaker, we will live with it. But we’re not going to compromise ourselves or the residents of Joburg.’”

READ: ‘ActionSA betrayed us and overstated its importance,’ says ANC, as Joburg speaker is removed

‘We will not be blackmailed’​

Mashaba said ActionSA’s refusal to vote for the budget and its opposition to the ANC’s governance style was rooted in principle, not politics. He said he was not worried that tension in Joburg would cascade into the City of Tshwane, where ActionSA holds the mayorship.

“We will not be blackmailed,” he said. “If the ANC wants to take what’s happening in Joburg and make it a problem in Tshwane, that’s their decision. I won’t lose sleep over it.”

He confirmed that the party’s working relationship with the ANC in Tshwane was still in place – for now. But he said any attempt by the ANC to replicate Johannesburg tension in Tshwane would be telling.

“In Tshwane, we work together. But if they want to bring the chaos of Joburg to Tshwane, that’s their call. It will just prove our point,” Mashaba said.

He also dismissed the ANC’s claims that ActionSA “overstated its importance” in the Joburg council.


“We told them at the start – you don’t need us. But they came to us because they were vulnerable. We agreed to help, but we were clear: we won’t compromise on governance or corruption.”

On Mthembu’s removal and gender criticism​

Mashaba pushed back strongly against suggestions that ActionSA had failed to protect its former speaker, Nobuhle Mthembu, particularly amid claims that gender may have played a role in her removal.

“Anyone bringing gender into this is being ridiculous,” he said. “Our decision was to protect her from abuse, not abandon her.”

He explained that Mthembu had been deliberately undermined by the ANC executive.

Reports were sent to her late, meetings weren’t being attended, and she was being compromised by the executive.
Herman Mashaba
“We knew the public would start to blame her for failures that weren’t hers.”

Mashaba said the party regularly met with its speakers in Joburg and Tshwane to assess performance and challenges. He said they saw that Mthembu was being isolated and sidelined.

“You can speak to her director – reports would be brought late, meetings wouldn’t be scheduled, section 79 meetings were ignored by ANC members of the mayoral committees,” he said.

“She couldn’t act against them because they were in the executive. This wasn’t governance. It was sabotage.”

Despite the removal, Mthembu remains an ActionSA councillor in the Johannesburg legislature.

“She hasn’t lost her job. She’s still a councillor and remains an important part of our team,” Mashaba said.

READ: Herman Mashaba blasts Joburg's administration: ‘It’s a one-man show and lacks accountability'

Eyes on 2026: ‘We must emerge as the biggest party’​

Mashaba said the experience in Johannesburg had hardened ActionSA’s resolve to pursue outright power in next year’s local government elections.

“We’ve learnt our lesson. We will never again work with any party unless we are the leading party,” he said.

“In 2026, if there are coalitions, there must be a proper binding agreement – not letters of intent. And that agreement must be made public before any voting happens.”


He said voters should trust ActionSA to govern ethically and transparently.

“We want to govern. But we want to govern well. And we want to respect all parties and serve all communities – especially the poor ones who get forgotten.”

What lies ahead​

The removal of Mthembu has opened a new chapter in Johannesburg’s political landscape, and ActionSA is preparing to step into its new role as a vocal opposition party.

“We are ready to hold them accountable,” Mashaba said. “There’s no going back.”
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:

Eish, when DA BAD is all you have going for you
 

Transport Minister Barbara Creecy plans to introduce a Railway Bill to Parliament, which she hopes will open up this crucial sector to private investment.

“To provide certainty about the future of the reform programme, it is very important to enshrine that programme in law,” Creecy said on a webinar by financial services group PSG.

This legislation will allow private third-party train operators to enter the public railway system, while private companies can also play a role in the renovation and modernisation of SA’s railway infrastructure.

“Interestingly, there is currently no bill that covers all aspects of rail transport in our country, so this will be the first framework legislation,” says Creecy.

“Legislation provides more definitive legal certainty than a policy that has simply been passed by cabinet and can be changed by a future cabinet.”

According to Creecy, the private sector has shown great interest following her request for comments on private participation in railway and port infrastructure that she issued in March. The comment period closed at the end of May and her department received 163 submissions.

“The most important thing we wanted to ensure is that the proposals are relevant, because in the past we have seen that proposals issued by state-owned entities have not been attractive or interesting to the market,” says Creecy.

She wants to increase the volume of rail freight transport to 250 million tonnes per year from the current 149 million tonnes per year.

Transnet is on track to deliver 161 million tonnes in its latest financial year and is aiming for 180 million tonnes in the next.

Creecy has also set ambitious targets to restore South Africa’s passenger rail network. She aims to have a total of 600 million passenger journeys per year by 2030. The current rate in South Africa is only 77 million.

Targets have also been set for the Airports Company of South Africa (Acsa) to increase its passenger and air cargo traffic by building a new air cargo terminal at O.R. Tambo Airport in Kempton Park.
At the very least railway reform is still on. It would be cool to be able to go by rail cheaply and effectively to any city in my lifetime.
 
Looks like a declaration of war... But Mchunu could just remove him for no reason except "I can LMAO". Like Rama did to Whitfield?

Or who appoints provincial commissioners?
He is not a politician so he cannot just be fired with no reason.
 
Last edited:
All this happens just after the President has left for Brazil. Whoever is acting President might need to give him a call.
Political interference in the police is an age old tradition in this country. What's new is someone in the police raising it so publicly. Mkhwanazi is not long for this world. I see that retard Malatji is leading the charge in the usual knee jerk reaction of an ANC cadre.
 
My guess? Mkhwanazi got wind of a pending suspension and said “**** it”. Glad he did though - we’re behind him 100%.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X