South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I think i speak for the majority when i say...
upyours Briggs....
,.|..
I think Mr Biggs is full of brown stuff.....
No not brown stuff, its suppose to be orange remember![]()
I agree with most comments to this article.
SEACOM is an open cable system, available to whomever wishes to purchase bandwidth from it. The key here is that its sold AT THE SAME PRICE to everyone - no matter how big or small you are (unlike SAT3/SAFE).
So, if Mr. Briggs wishes to "swallow up" the "savings" from SEACOM and spend it on all those stamps they use, then so be it, but the reality will be that ISP A will be selling a "SEACOM" product at price Rx and IBurst will sell "SEACOM" product B at price Rxx then the consumer will know who is being ripped off. Just because SEACOM landed, doesnt mean you can now all of a sudden increase your marketing and administrative costs to deal with all that bandwidth coming into the country. Your infrastructure has always been there, surely your return on investment has been reached and now its just pure profit as you milk the cable for extra bandwidth? Besides, charge the same amount and give higher caps then you will make a few people happier for a little while. Charge the same amount despite the cable and still enforce the crappy caps (40mb lol) then you will see the Brown hitting the Orange.
Your Orange wont be the sun rising, your orange will be the sunset
Keep up the good work Iburst. It's this exact mentality which causes you to have nil customers.
Sorry Mr Briggs, but that's an absolute heap of steaming shyte right there. The additional input costs listed are common for all businesses, including international service providers who are able to provide cheap, reliable and affordable internet access to their customers. Having spent time overseas in various countries, I never once had the displeasure of hearing any of them state that they couldn't lower prices because they had to market to me. FFS Mr Briggs, use your noggin before trying to fool everyone with BS.
The inhibitive factors in providing cheaper and faster internet access has been the lack of bandwidth and the unnecessary control of the only international bandwidth this country had. Your own company has stated this. Now that the problem is slowly being resolved, you're attempting to bullschit the consumer into believing that it was in fact not the critical factor, and we won't see noticeable price reductions because of your marketing (not our problem and not unique to your business), the cost of modems (sorry but do the economies of scale not apply to your business?), the cost of infrastructure (um, again, not our problem and not unique - you telling me that because there is now additional bandwidth that the cost of additional infrastructure cannibalises any potential cost saving you could pass on to the consumer - try pulling the other one, twit), and let's not forget the pearler - support! WTF!?
Mr Briggs - evidently you need to hone your bullschitting skills a little more before your next foray into public relations. And to be honest, if you're not prepared to provide your clients with price reductions and attempt to use these drivelous excuses as reasoning, then you deserve every little bit of subscriber attrition that it results in.
Now for once in your life, listen to your customers instead of trying to preach to them. FFS...
EDIT: I'm disappointed that the 'staff writer' merely reported on Mr Briggs' comments and chose not to dig holes in the statements made. It would make for harder hitting journalism and be a far more interesting article had this been done. I believe the journalists are in a much better position to do this than many of us are and to take it a step further - I feel they have a responsibility to do so - for the sake of making a difference. Otherwise, what purpose do they serve apart from disseminating information?
While companies/media are talking down the price of bandwidth, this idiot is doing the opposite. It looks like he wants to commit broadband suicide (lol).
I really hope this guy has to eat his words very soon.
Guess everyone's waiting for the next ISP to announce pricing and just make sure they stay 50c below that to share the cake "nicely"...why upset the apple cart with real competition? And so far all that is happening is we get a greater range of brown stuff from all the new providers with a license in hand.