SEACOM price cuts will take time

so if the local infrastructure is also a factor in pricing, then we can expect to pay the same rates that we do for local bandwidth at the moment???
 
so if the local infrastructure is also a factor in pricing, then we can expect to pay the same rates that we do for local bandwidth at the moment???

Yes, and with iBurst/Vodacom/MTN/all-the-wireless-providers you pay exactly the same for local as international, so he's speaking the truth.

I think SEACOM's going to reshake the landscape from this absurd situation unique to South Africa where wireless is an actual viable competitor to an ADSL line.
 
so if the local infrastructure is also a factor in pricing, then we can expect to pay the same rates that we do for local bandwidth at the moment???

Haha!

His Excuses make me sick. can't WAIT to see what's gonna happen to the big internet players in SA the next couple of months.

Those that don't want to play the game, WON'T have to - You don't even have to make excuses iBurst, we'll let you move on all by yourself.

OK, so iBurst has givin up, as they can't handle it.
 
I'm so tired of this country's telecoms crap. Think I should move to a mudhut and live from the sea.
 
I'm so tired of this country's telecoms crap. Think I should move to a mudhut and live from the sea.

sounds like a plan! Hopefully the electro-magnetic radiation from the seacom cable won't scare all the fish away :D
 
Point that needs to be made here is clear.

If any of ISP's has a need to step up and make a public statement like this one of Mr Bull****ter of IBurst, they have to present their entire costing structure to supstantiate this statment.

If you not willing or can't do that.... rather stay quiet!

<Dbld out.. >
 
Point that needs to be made here is clear.

If any of ISP's has a need to step up and make a public statement like this one of Mr Bull****ter of IBurst, they have to present their entire costing structure to supstantiate this statment.

If you not willing or can't do that.... rather stay quiet!

<Dbld out.. >

Nah, who cares if they can't manage their own costs - If other ISPs are willing to pass some savings to us while saving themselves, we will move to them.

We don't give a **** why they can't provide bigger caps/etc, we will find someone else who will.

Like I said, no need to excuse yourselves, you can leave without making excuses.

If seacom provides 90% cheaper bandwidth and you can't bump up the CAPs, then you are CLEARLY trying to fool us. We have had enough of your pathetic excuses. :p
 
Oh this makes me so angry!!! Almosy angry enough to say F this country and pack and go live in a 1st world country somewhere...

I have been closely following the reports and progress on Seacom over the last year or so, and it's quite amusing to watch how the whole story has changed. It has taken a complete 360-degree turnaround in fact. I should have printed each article that has been published over the last couple of years (up to this one) and the put them all into a PowerPoint slideshow, so the world could watch them in "time-laps" mode. It has gone form the introduction of the Seacom cable as the all-time, much needed saviour of the universe for SA DSL consumers to this. It was initially said (and over a fair long period) that we would see MASSIVE reductions in bandwidth costs and greater speeds once Seacom landed. I have watched the articles over the last 6 months or so, gradually and ever so subtly change their tune. Obviously there are some "fat-cats" in the business out there, that have seen that they can bring in this cheap bandwidth, but still continue to sell it to us at ridiculous prices. Our pricing does not drop (or only marginally if it does), but their profits sure increase. I think that there is some collusion between the providers/ISPs out there to keep us in the dark and rip us off for as long as possible. Oh yes, and one last thing - **** you, Mr Briggs.
 
The thing is...

1) Mr Briggs is and idiot. He clearly has no understanding of how a new international cable with 10x the capacity of the current one will impact the South African broadband market. What exactly is his position at iBurst anyway? Head of Commercial? WTF is that?

2) MyBB journalists SHOULD be posing the questions WE'RE raising to these idiots... instead they copy/paste from some generic email. Look at all the valid points we've raised! any tech journalist with half an active braincell would have asked questions like
"What infrastructure costs?"
"How does iBurst plan to stay competitive to other ISPs if they drop prices?"
"Will this cable impact your 40mb cap options?"
"Neotel is laying fiber all over the place and is still pricing their products lower than yours... why is that?"
"So SEACOM will not affect your bulk bandwidth expenditure at all?"
"What exactly do you do at iBurst?"
 
However, consumers will need to wait for more submarine cables like the West Africa Cable System (WACS) and the Eastern Africa Submarine Cable System (EASSy) to go live.
How many times have I told you people that SEACOM will not bring down prices ?
Still, everytime I got flack for saying.
However, consumers should not expect to see the sharp falls in broadband pricing that some of the more optimistic commentators have predicted."
I said that numerous times only to be argued with and called a pesimist.
Briggs said that most Internet service providers will also be reluctant to rely exclusively on the SEACOM cable because it is a standalone system without a redundant back-up.
Yeah whatever - like you had redundancy when using SAT3 only. This is just following Rule #1 of Telcoms and Politics - shift the blame.
 
The thing is...

1) Mr Briggs is and idiot. He clearly has no understanding of how a new international cable with 10x the capacity of the current one will impact the South African broadband market. What exactly is his position at iBurst anyway? Head of Commercial? WTF is that?

2) MyBB journalists SHOULD be posing the questions WE'RE raising to these idiots... instead they copy/paste from some generic email. Look at all the valid points we've raised! any tech journalist with half an active braincell would have asked questions like
"What infrastructure costs?"
"How does iBurst plan to stay competitive to other ISPs if they drop prices?"
"Will this cable impact your 40mb cap options?"
"Neotel is laying fiber all over the place and is still pricing their products lower than yours... why is that?"
"So SEACOM will not affect your bulk bandwidth expenditure at all?"
"What exactly do you do at iBurst?"

whoop whoop. +1
 
Aaaah hahahaaa! Flippen A man! since he will never answer them, I will attempt my best to answer them the iBurst way (On truth serum)

"What infrastructure costs?"
I have no freaken clue man, we're just making it up! have you checked our profits!? we are going down fast in user numbers, but as long as we have a few left, we're raking in the money.

"How does iBurst plan to stay competitive to other ISPs if they drop prices?"
We don't, we'll just make new Adverts, to fool the newer generations. you see, the people that want internet, don't HAVE internet - they don't know about all the bad things people say on forums about iBurst, all they hear are the funny adverts!! :p

"Will this cable impact your 40mb cap options?"
we'll take it down a notch. probably decrease it to 20mb. you see, iBurst is a bubble company, and as we all live in little bubbles, we can't think clearly. we'll be saving an extra 20 rands worth of bandwidth for use when all the 64kbs users bring down our whole network.

Remember, Bubbles go Up, NOT Down.



"Neotel is laying fiber all over the place and is still pricing their products lower than yours... why is that?"
1 word mate, 1 word: Bubble.

"So SEACOM will not affect your bulk bandwidth expenditure at all?"
Nope, the money we'll be saving is the money we will be spending.

"What exactly do you do at iBurst?"
We Blow bubbles.

Seriously, we are a hard working company - do you know how hard it is to think of all these exciting-sounding adverts on the radio!?
 
Its not just Briggs, Alan Knott-Craig (iBurst CEO) said exactly the same thing a few weeks back. Just as when he was at Vodacom, these guys have a vested interest in keeping prices high. They will charge what the CAN, not what is REASONABLE. Their corporate mission statement should be "K@K and Betaal consumers".
 
so if the local infrastructure is also a factor in pricing, then we can expect to pay the same rates that we do for local bandwidth at the moment???
I told you it was not going to happen - well now you have an article that spells it out in so many words.

I don't suppose you are going to ask the dude from iBurst how old he is now are you ? :cool:
 
I told you it was not going to happen - well now you have an article that spells it out in so many words.

I don't suppose you are going to ask the dude from iBurst how old he is now are you ? :cool:

Seacom has not even launched yet... and this is a quote from one more provider... not very well respected in the industry as you can see from the comments here. If you believe this idiot, then that simply confirms my opinion of you.
 
Seacom has not even launched yet... and this is a quote from one more provider... not very well respected in the industry as you can see from the comments here. If you believe this idiot, then that simply confirms my opinion of you.

Keep digging.... :D

If Seacom goes live and prices do not go down significantly, as numerous people have said already (including me), I'll just remind of of this... ;)
 
I'm betting iBurst is gonna face some serious cash issues this time next year, with possible liquidation from all it's customers leaving for MUCH, MUCH better deals.

I can see clearly this company simply just does NOT want to play along anymore.

Who wants to bet against me? anyone?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X