Showing certain forums to registered members only

Status
Not open for further replies.
Closing "Off Topic" sends a message that forum members cannot be trusted to act courteously towards others. ;)

A cursory reading of “Off Topic” conclusively proves that we cannot be trusted to act courteously towards others.
 
Members who need protection have no business posting on public forums. :(
Protect me from yourself - Affirmative Action - YouTube
 
So you won’t be able to view off-topic posts unless you’re a member?

There are a lot of sub-forums in off-topic that could be helpful for non-members and usually come up first in google searches.

I think that a lot of discussions in off-topic (found through google search) drive new members to join. I could be wrong.
This.
I found myBroadband by being able to view the sub-forums, and answers to my questions coming up in Google search results
 
I am OK with it, provided that MyBB fixes the search function, its pretty dismal, Google does a far better job.
That's going to be a thing of the past so I also hope they improve the search function.
 
I thought only registered members can post. Is then not to see the discussions and the article. In any case anyboday can register or is there different type of registering that i do not know about?
 
I thought only registered members can post. Is then not to see the discussions and the article. In any case anyboday can register or is there different type of registering that i do not know about?
This is about google being able to index forum posts, anybody can view the posts (even if not logged in) currently which includes the google indexing engine, thus unsavoury posts comes up in google searches on certain topics.
 
Honestly in two minds about this...

I think de-indexing the Off-Topic section would be a good start... but hiding it entirely might deter new registrations (and how can we abuse new people if they don't join).

If there are POPIA concerns though, then its an entirely different kettle of fish and maybe hiding Off-Topic would be a good move.
 
I'm gonna guess it's some weak-sauce complaint along the lines of a company not wanting their ad running above a thread bashing religion or something. Which if true, doesn't make much sense - it's not like anyone associates the ad above a page with the content on a page. Dunno - I'd be curious to know what the complaint is too...but I suspect there's a lot of old-school (dstv, ster-kinekor) type companies run by dinosaurs who have no idea how the internet works.

Eh - doesn't really bother me either way. I'm fine with making certain parts for registered members only. Just be careful of giving them too much power to leverage changes in the platform they advertise on.

Just tell the advertisers that we all run Ad Blockers anyway, and that none of us take any notice of online adverts or ever respond to adverts anyway. Our brains have been long trained to subliminally filter out sales messages.
:giggle:
 
@rpm - Yes I agree if I see some of "vermin" posted and all of this open to a Google search.
Please close to members only :thumbsup:
 
If this decision has already been made then why are we being asked for feedback? Shouldn’t we be asked before the decision is made?
 
Blink 3 times ;););) if multichoice has you by the short and curlies.
 
The way it's worded.... this is actually about the backlash because of the "sponsored article" spamming aint it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X