LazyLion
King of de Jungle
I can understand a company increasing prices in accordance with inflation in order to continue paying their workers a living wage.
But in this case you have a company that has a VERY HIGH margin of profit raising prices where there is no justification for doing so (in fact 90% of the other companies in the telecommunications sector are fighting a price war and are in fact REDUCING prices)...
and AT THE SAME TIME... TELKOM are facing a strike by their workers because that company IS NOT PAYING THEM A LIVING WAGE!
So Lancelot... Telkom could have paid their workers a fair wage AND absorbed the cost increases WITHOUT taking inflation into account... AND THEY WOULD STILL BE MAKING OBSCENE AMOUNTS OF PROFIT!
So take your "rate of inflation" and fit it in sideways (since you obviously have plenty of room to spare).
But in this case you have a company that has a VERY HIGH margin of profit raising prices where there is no justification for doing so (in fact 90% of the other companies in the telecommunications sector are fighting a price war and are in fact REDUCING prices)...
and AT THE SAME TIME... TELKOM are facing a strike by their workers because that company IS NOT PAYING THEM A LIVING WAGE!
So Lancelot... Telkom could have paid their workers a fair wage AND absorbed the cost increases WITHOUT taking inflation into account... AND THEY WOULD STILL BE MAKING OBSCENE AMOUNTS OF PROFIT!
So take your "rate of inflation" and fit it in sideways (since you obviously have plenty of room to spare).
Last edited: